10 Replies to “No how much you self-censor, some jackass will find something to be offended.”

  1. What the hell, I can’t believe you posted that. It obviously is meant to offend people-of-color-other-than-white. Don’t you care about people-of-color-other-than-white? POCOTW deserve your love too.

    It’s also offensive to people-that-are-easily-offended-about-everything-including-this-acronym (PTAEOAEITA). I realize the irony of offending PTAEOAEITA by merely typing out that acronym, but if I didn’t spread the word about them, it would be hateful. Damned if you do and damned if you don’t I guess.

    Seriously, though WTF is LGBTQIA+. Can we add a few more letters to that acronym? Maybe there’s room for # or ^ or a &.




    0



    0
    1. Via Wikipedia:

      “The initialism LGBTTQQIAAP (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, transsexual, queer, questioning, intersex, asexual, ally, pansexual) has also resulted, although such initialisms are sometimes criticized for being confusing and leaving some people out, as well as issues of placement of the letters within the new title.”

      So, yeah. Now the irony. This SJW got offended at literally nothing, then lumped together and marginalized entire disparate classes of people with a “plus” symbol because she couldn’t be bothered to look up or type out the current approved, inclusive-as-possible acronym. She wrote LGBTQIA+, alienating and explicitly dimishing the humanity of the remaining TQAP-identifying individuals. Lazy, callous, and disrespectful.

      Maybe I’ll find her on Facebook and share my “offense.”

      Self-aware is something these serfs generally aren’t.

      Additionally, it occurs to me that if she was willing to abridge the list with a +, she’s playing favorites over the unincluded by including a FEW of the nonstandard new initials on top of the much-better-known LGBT. “LGBT+” would have been sufficient and, because of mainstream usage, LESS disrespectful to the community this gal thinks is so thin-skinned in the first place.




      0



      0
  2. that’s it. i’m done. from now on they’re called “not straight.” that’s a totally inclusive descriptor of all the alphabet descriptors currently used, and any future ones.




    0



    0

Feel free to express your opinions. Trolling, overly cussing and Internet Commandos will not be tolerated .