Smoke & Thunder Payback: You are doing it wrong.

Posted on by

It is official! I have my own Life size cardboard cutout at Smoke & Blunder courtesy of Smoke & Blunder’s Webmaster/Admin/Petulant Child.

God, it is hilarious. Do S&B actually thinks they are creating a professional image for their “business” that will make them respectable and earn them a billion bucks?

Dear S&B: please keep that profile for as long as you want. It is hurting you, not me.

Other recipients of S&B’s “payback”
Breda:
Barron Barnet:
Say Uncle:
I am sure more are to come. Hell, Linoge must be pissed he does not have his fake profile up yet.


100 thoughts on “Smoke & Thunder Payback: You are doing it wrong.”

  4. Pingback: Sharp as a Marble - When your only tool is

  9. I kind of get the feeling that he’s going for the “Howard Stern” approach. He says the most outrageous/offensive things he can come up with to drive up readership by people who don’t really like or agree with his statements; but are curious to see what he’ll say next. Which could also be a not-so-clever tactic of an anti…

    Reply ↓

  12. Reminds me of the notebook of a jilted teenager talking about all the jerks who are jerky to him, and how much he hates them….and WHY DON’T THEY LIKE ME????

    Let’s hope Mr. Pedo is also a cutter.

    Reply ↓

  13. I think it’s about time to Out this Guy. He obviously doesn’t give a Crap about any else’s Privacy, since he has shown a willingness to steal Profiles w/o Permission for his own Profit. But then He claims “Fair Usage” when he’s called on it.

    Of course I do believe it when he says he’ll never SELL any Personal Info. He’ll just GIVE it to “RipYouOff.com”, which is on the laptop next to him, THEN “RipYouOff.com” will sell it.

    And since he keeps talking about Yelp.com, is he part of that Company, or is he ripping THEM off also?

    Reply ↓

  14. You know, the only time I have heard of this site is because they are being dicks. And having read the replies on other threads, I would have to agree with the gunblogger community.

    I will never load their site in my browser unless it is by accident.

    As far as the “No such thing as bad publicity” argument they tried to make, I think this publicity is closer to “Local child care run by child molester”.

    Reply ↓

  15. “Sucking up to his small following of vampirish female fans”

    Dear Smoke & Thunder Admin, I beg to disagree!

    1) It’s the vampires who do the sucking, not their food fans;

    2) Small? I just got a phone call from Oleg Volk last night! I’m huge, I’m nationwide!

    3) Following? There are other goths who read this blog?

    and finally,

    4) My name is Erin. Say my name, bitch! SAY MY NAME!!

    In conclusion, Smoke & Thunder Admin: Where is my profile? You keep this up and I’ll start to think you don’t love me any more. :(

    Reply ↓

    • I spoke with one of NSSF’s VPs and told them about my intent to user repost their image, link, etc. Did you both to read their bios and super strict policies? I also contacted John Lott about the autofriending of every new Smoke & Thunder user He did not object.

      I have not found any intelligent life here and the parody campaign will end soon, so stay tuned to Smoke & Thunder.

      Reply ↓

  17. This has GOT to be an anti doing it. Their home page talks about the hunting and shooting sports. Thats right out of the Anti playbook of *the Second Amendment is about duck hunting and Olympic Target Shooting*.

    Reply ↓

  22. At this point, I think it is pretty much an inescapable conclusion that “Choke and Chunder” is being run as a false-flag exercise by a “gun control” extremist – consider the personal attacks, ad hominem fallacies, the “carries a concealed handgun which provides him comfort and warmth”, the fallacy that we are “driving people away” by our oh-so-scary demeanors when that is obviously not true (i.e. the myth of the declining firearm ownership rate), the repeated reference to “gun fanatics”, and so forth.

    I almost have to wonder if this “Michael Frank” name is nothing more than yet another sock-puppet, especially given the non-stop references to “young people” in light of a certain Michael Frank’s past child pornography charges. This is all starting to seem too much like an orgy of evidence, and I have to wonder if his name, like ours, is being used as a stooge by someone else.

    Or he is that stupid / sick.

    The only significant flaw in this hypothesis is that none of the “gun control” extremists who have gone to fisticuffs with us before has demonstrated sufficient coding knowledge to assemble a site even as pathetic and dysfunctional as “Smoke and Thunder”. This is not to say they could not learn it, or recruit someone who does know how to make a craptacular site, but it is worth noting.

    And, yeah, this is me being a little sad that despite winning the Say Uncle 2012 Gun Blog of the Year award, I do not get a cardboard cut-out of my very own :( .

    Reply ↓

  24. The bitch slapping is still going on over on the Starbucks FB wall as well. One of them made a snide comment along the lines of ‘I suppose Ladd should just off himself with a pence, screwdriver or a glass vase since according to you those are lethal weapons. Idiots’
    What I said next probably would have caused an actual room to go ballistic.
    “NGZ-yes as a matter of fact a pencil, screw driver, or vase CAN BE lethal weapons.You want me to explain them to you toddler? I can think of several ways to do it off the top of my head. Given a little more time I can think of more. The Human Mind is the most lethally efficient weapon on the planet. And HERE endeth the lesson, toddler. *sniff, sniff* Ewww… you crapped yourself. Now go run along and tell your mother that the bad man scared you, you stink.”
    That was actually a rewrite from what I’d originally started to write which was a point by point enumeration of the 7 ways I could think of off the top of my head to kill with those objects. If I’d written the enumeration and printed it, it probably would have caused the room to go dead silent.

    Reply ↓

  26. Pingback: Smoke and Thunder Runs Asunder | The Minuteman

  29. Pingback: "smoke & thunder" fails at life | walls of the city

  30. Personally, I’m not legally old enough to own a weapon, but you gun bloggers in general have done nothing but encourage me that keeping one around for self defense is a good idea. Whoever it is trying to convince anyone otherwise is a total idiot and shouldn’t be allowed access to the internet, much less a computer.

    Reply ↓

    • Young man, generally speaking, there is no minimum age for “owning” a firearm, only a minimum age for purchasing a firearm yourself. In my home state, a father can buy a firearm for his son’s 1st birthday or 13th birthday and say “Here son, this is yours now”, and the firearm will for all intents and purposes belong to the 1 year old or 13 year old. So please, educate yourself before you start spreading your false impression to others. I’m not trying to convince you that shit & piss gun blogs are bad for the image of firearms ownership. In the end, that is up to you to decide. I am only presenting an alternative point of view, and if you cannot see the truths illustrated in my latest post, “What would I call 10,000 gun blogs at the bottom of the ocean?” then I feel you are just in denial and looking to latch on to something, like the freaks that populate this blog. I would highly encourage read up on guns from reputable sources and more qualified people who might actually educate you on the subject. You could start by picking up a copy of “More Guns, Less Crime” by John Lott. He is a nationally known and highly respected gun writer who can convey the real facts to you. There is just too much bad info and hot air on 4th-tier gun blogs like this one. My point is that 4th-tier gun blogs mostly serve to divert people’s attention away from more qualified, more educational sources of information.

      Reply ↓

      • And here we are, with another shining example of your all-consuming FAIL.

        JustAnotherGhost is apparently under the ripe old age of 18, and thus would qualify as a “young person” in most people’s books (I cannot speak to how child pornographers would view him, but that is another matter for another time). Furthermore, he is apparently new to firearms, and is trying to learn things from around the ‘tubes.

        In other words, he is exactly the demographic you keep claiming you want to reach – young, under/mis-informed, and questing for knowledge.

        And then you go and attack him. Instead of simply correcting him with a helpful, “Actually, you know what…?” you go and personally attack him for daring to spread mistaken information.

        I literally could not care less about some two-bit, anonymous, misogynistic asshole insulting weblogs he does not like from no position of authority or knowledge to speak of, but I do believe strongly in pointing out hypocrisy and logical inconsistencies when I see them, and both of those phrases more than adequately encompass your behavior thus far.

        So, really, what are you doing here?

      • He’s here to help us reach our true potential? Naw.. that’s not it.

        He’s here so that the anti’s have a blog they can point at and say “See, this is why we need to take guns away, look at this asshole!”

        Yeah, that’s probably it.

        And don’t you know that the way to build a billion dollar social networking site is to shit all over everyone no matter who they are or their experience level.

  31. Pingback: False Flag | Weer'd World

  32. Pingback: Smoking Blunder Out Does Smoke and Thunder | The Minuteman

  34. Pingback: SayUncle » I have to admit that my fake profile pic is funny

  35. Pingback: the implied threats of "smoke and thunder" | walls of the city

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>