Reid Paris Style Weapons

Paris-Style Assault Rifles? Mikhail Timofeyevich Kalashnikov just bounced hard inside his coffin. Somehow the idea of an AK-47 with a beret and pencil-thin mustache eating some overpriced pastry at an outside cafe pops into mind.

Senator Reid must close the loophole that allows exercise equipment attack people and make them say stupid stuff like that.

reid banged up

Spread the love

By Miguel.GFZ

Semi-retired like Vito Corleone before the heart attack. Consiglieri to J.Kb and AWA. I lived in a Gun Control Paradise: It sucked and got people killed. I do believe that Freedom scares the political elites.

16 thoughts on “Gun Control folly: Re-brand and Retry the Stupid.”
  1. Hey! What is this “NRA loophole”, and why does it allow terror suspects to buy full-auto weapons? Can citizens use the same loophole? If not, this is BLATANTLY unfair.

    1. Unfortunately, the ATF and liberal politicians only sell guns to criminals. Ordinary people like us are forbidden.

      It would be funny to respond to posts like this with information about just how many anti-gun politicians are engaged in gun- and human-trafficking rings. Because as I recall, the number is close to 100%.

  2. Seriously, please write your congress republicans and let them know that no one is buying this horseshit.

  3. Why don’t they want to close the grenade loophole?
    If something is possible, they assume it is because it is legal, and if something is illegal it must be impossible.

  4. Now hold on here, when they say “Paris-style assault rifles,” do they mean “Assault rifles like the ones used in the Paris attacks,” or “Assault rifles like the ones available in Paris?”

    Because one of these is already illegal to buy without a permit and the other doesn’t exist.

  5. Dear Harry Reid:

    Blow me.

    Sincerely,

    The Conservatives of America

    PS – You should seriously consider moving before you wind up in prison for the rest of your sad, misbegotten life.

  6. It’s fairly simple to deduce the answer* to this question, but I still have to put it out there, for the record:

    What parts of “due process of law,” being “informed of the nature and cause of the accusation” and being “confronted with the witnesses against him” do Senator Reid and his fellow travelers not understand? If the criteria for being placed on some “terrorist watch list” satisfy the protections of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, I have yet to hear of it**. Yet they wail that being placed on such a watch list ought to be sufficient to deprive those on such a list of an essential liberty.

    *Based on past performance, the logical answer to my question is, of course, that they fail to understand any limits on government powers that stand in the way of them getting what they want.

    **Nor will I hear of it, as both the criteria and the list itself are withheld from public scrutiny.

  7. Reid is one of, if not THE, most despicable creatures ever to crawl out from that sewer called DC. A cheat, a liar, a coward, a thief and a traitor. That picture of him with a face that looks like he should’ve kept his mouth shut is what I consider a good start.

    He tripped on an exercise machine? Let’s rent him a wood chipper.

    1. Ever see the movie “Casino”? Remember the corrupt state politician willing to take the comped rooms and hookers, but then was all “wait, who?” later?
      Yeah, based on the real life actions of Harry Reid.

  8. This is the Harry Reid that Wayne LaPierre and the NRA wanted to endorse for reelection. After the membership threatened revolt, they stopped the endorsement; they gave him money instead. Hey Wayne, how does that knife feel? Need some help pulling it out of your back? Screw you!

    1. Let’s not create imaginary stories. In the past, Reid either voted or abstained to go against 2A legislation whatever his motives were. The NRA endorses as the politicians vote, not what they say and they only stoppe supporting him once he actually took sides and sgtarted screwing around….although he did tank Feinstein’s AWB II that she introduced after Sandy Hook.

Comments are closed.