The next time you are in a grocery or convenience store, check out the magazine aisle. As CBS46 investigative reporter Karyn Greer found out, gun porn appears to be more popular than travel and cooking magazines and in plain sight of impressionable children.Sexually explicit and tabloid magazines are kept on the top shelves of stores to keep them out of sight of precious young children, but gun magazines are in plain sight and easy reach for anyone to grab and take a peek.”It just proliferates the spread of guns and glamourizes guns and everything that goes along with it,” said Glenn Sutton.
Source: Gun porn: Magazines found in easy access to kids – CBS46 News
So Social Justice Warrior sees that Gun Magazines are there for people to grab, including the wee ones and momentarily loses control of the sphincter breaking the promise to his mom to wear clean underwear.
Gun porn is described as photos of guns that display them in the same carefully posed and lighted manner as the models in traditional pornography. The magazines include glossy covers with sexy young women armed and ready to shoot.
Huh? Commercial photography is now porn? Carefully posed like a model in Playboy? I can suddenly imagine Oleg Volk dressed in a loud 70s polyester jumpsuit, camera in hand talking seductively to a Glock:
“Yes baby, show me some polymer…yeah like that <click> Now rub your mag release…slowly…<click> that is so hot! Now rack your slide and open wide…<click> put your finger in the chamber to make sure there is nothing there…oh yes, I am sweating here …<click>”
The magazines include glossy covers with sexy young women armed and ready to shoot.
Which magazine? At least none that I have seen in any display. In fact, the “investigative reporter” showed magazines with women dressed normally but they happened to be with a gun.
And somehow I don’t think that the guys from the Duck Commanders dressed in cammo qualify as porn, even in Japan.
CBS46 went undercover to Publix, Kroger and Walmart to find the magazines. In one Publix, we found 15 gun magazines, more than travel, cooking and beauty magazines.
Them store people sure are stoopid. Why would any corporation place 15 gun magazines and only a couple of the others? Maybe because they are mainstream and sell?
at eye level, easily accessible to young children. A Dr. Seuss display was directly in front of rifle and gun magazines.
OK, that is just mean and prejudiced. You don’t care about the Little People? People in wheelchairs or with disabilities that cannot reach the third floor level you want to put the magazines on because a picture of the scares you into spotting yellow in your undies? You are a frigging Social Justice Warrior for hell’s sake, you MUST care for other less fortunate than you! Check Your Health Privilege!
We contacted the stores to get the policy on gun magazines with no response.
It is the South. They are too polite to tell you to go flock yourself.
OK, now explanation for the non-Gunnies: yes, you have seen us use the term “gun porn” before and it is about pictures of guns, but not just any guns, no siree, they must have some special significance of beauty in craftsmanship that sets them apart. For me would be a pre-WWW II Thompson Machine gun in perfect condition and never fired, a gun that I would love to own. That is different from a picture of fully naked Victoria Secret model….OK, she is also finely crafted (although she probably has had several rounds put through) but the real difference is that if I can lay my hands on a Thompson, I can examine her and check her parts and if I go crazy, it will mean that the mortgage payments would take a hit and the wife would send me to the couch to sleep for the next two years. Laying my hands n a naked Victoria Secret model would earn me a charge for sexual attack plus the wife would either divorce me or kill me instantly being that last option the easiest one to endure.
I believe that the term GunPorn comes from the blocks companies put in their computers so workers don’t go wasting time when they are supposed to be doing something productive. The two top terms blocked were porn and guns and only because some idiot in HR probably thought looking at firearms in the Interwebs would suddenly make some office drone snap and take out middle management. I am guessing that Ms. Investigative Reporter did not investigate very deeply and had to come up with that line of unmitigated bullcrap to justify her 3 minutes on camera.
Hat Tip to Jeff A. via Twitter
Welcome to America lady, go hide in your “safe space” and suck your thumb.
Not just do they hate the 2A, they hate when the 1A is used to promote the 2A. Your freedoms offend their delicate sensibilities.
I have an overdue post about something like that
Whence reading her parts of the article, I kept hearing the voice of Charlie Brown’s teacher.
And FWIW, my definition of gun porn covers the gamut, from the aforementioned virgin Thompson, down to a good Kentucky Rifle, all the way up to a solid M270 MLRS. What can I say? If it go boom, me likey. I’m not discriminatory at all 🙂
PolyGunAmory?
ArmoryAmory?
So if I go to the range and blast away dual wieling with a gun in each hand John Woo style, does that count as a three way?
Only if all parties are consenting 🙂
This is a clear case of the SJW-standard tactic of hot-shaming. Telling men and women who put in the effort to look presentable that they’re too hot and they need to grunge up if they want to be taken seriously.
(No really, this is actually a thing. Feminist gamer Liana Kerzner has been told that her entirely natural breasts are too big and she should have them reduced if she wants people to listen to her. This in the same breath that they’ll tell you morbidly-obese land whales are healthy at any weight and you’re an awful person for telling them they’re going to die.)
These people are the perpetually offended. The will take anything and turn it into an offense or a privilege to beat you over the head with.
It is the heart of “critical theory.” They don’t have solutions to any problems, just complaints how everything is problematic all the time.
So THAT’S why Bernie Sanders is so popular among them.
They had to go “undercover” to locate gun magazines?!? Someone takes theyselves ENTIRELY too seriously……
And I bet she was humming the theme from Mission Impossible the whole time.
Their definition of “Pornography” is “professional photographs”.
That technically makes every cover of O magazine “Oprah Porn”….gross.
Could someone help me out with a term- that dishonest thing where the Anti’s will do like the above and describe the most prurient, horrible thing, and then give a count of things that are only semi-related. In the case above, describing what seems to be more of a tattoo or biker mag, then counting every single gun publication as if it was “Babes and Blasters”.
They love doing that sort of thing- twisting the stats where legit self defense and law enforcement shootings are lumped into the overall “gun death” stats, or where any shooting within a half a mile of an educational establishment is a “school shooting”.
Lying. That’s the word you’re looking for. See also Falsehoods, Misdirection, and Mendacity. Sometimes called Bull$#!+ , Poppycock, or Hooey. Also called Nonsense, Rubbish, Claptrap, Balderdash, Blather, Horse-hockey or Garbage.
Just as a side note, many if not all of the airport lounges now block access to gun web sites, along with porn websites, but you can still get to the Brady Bunch et al. I think it’s the default setting on Barracuda’s security filters!!!
Wow, 15 magazines and I thought the print industry was dying. Well, there you go, the masses have spoken.
If it offends these SJWs too much, perhaps they should put a copy of “Brady No Gun Times” or the “CSGV magazine” in front of the gun magazines…oh wait, those don’t exist because no one cares.
If you want to protect kids, get rid of Cosmopolitan and a few other vulgar women’s magazines that are so conflicted and confused about how to get the best orgasm and how to tell if your boyfriend is marriage material and how to get your body ready for the beach. Oh my!
Stolen from Bitter(http://www.pagunblog.com/2013/08/08/gun-magazine-sales-up/):
http://www.adweek.com/news/press/gun-publications-are-bright-spot-magazine-circulation-151710
Did she count the number of pages in those gun magazines? To determine if they were “high-capacity”?
One of the big things that made me stop reading The Economist (well, other than their utter incomprehension of how American politics works) was their breathless reporting of some English loser’s ‘scientific study’ claiming that “gun crime” rates can be linked to the presence on firearms-focused magazines. The Economist was calling for a ban on gun mags.
This was back in ’08 (I remember because their ‘American expert’ was saying that if McCain won and died in office, VP Palin should turn the Presidency over to Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid to rule as co-Presidents, while she continued as VP “to gain experience”), so this sort of nonsense has been in circulation at least that long.
And somehow I don’t think that the guys from the Duck Commanders dressed in cammo qualify as porn, even in Japan.
—
-blank stare-
You would be wrong.
-stares into the distance-
I am not googling Duck Commander Porn
One word – Ladybaby.
[…] that is the reason for this little rant. Miguel, my blogfather, had written about an ‘investigative reporter’ who seems to be stirring the fake outrage pot over the prevalence of Firearms magazines in grocery […]
I suppose this is the NRA’s fault too,but why not they get the blame for everything else.I think it is because the anti’s have no real claim,that they get so desperate and petty.Shame,shame on you frauds.