Bring out the crazy pills.
The U.S. government is bracing for a potential surge in political violence once the Supreme Court hands down the ruling that’s expected to overturn Roe v. Wade, according to a Department of Homeland Security memo obtained by Axios.
The big picture: Law enforcement agencies are investigating social-media threats to burn down or storm the Supreme Court building and murder justices and their clerks, as well as attacks targeting places of worship and abortion clinics.
Details: The unclassified May 13 memo by DHS’ intelligence arm says threats that followed the leak of a draft opinion — targeting Supreme Court Justices, lawmakers and other public officials, as well as clergy and health care providers — “are likely to persist and may increase leading up to and following the issuing of the Court’s official ruling.”
“Some racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists’ embrace of pro-life narratives may be linked to the perception of wanting to ‘save white children’ and ‘fight white genocide,'” the memo also says.
But the memo warns that this time, extremist acts could come from abortion-rights proponents as well.
Leaked memo shows DHS preparing for violence after abortion ruling (axios.com)
The official position of the administration is that White Supremacy is the biggest threat for the country. Therefore they need to attach it to everything they can no matter how absurd it may seem.
The mass shooting in Buffalo, N.Y., over the weekend has “complicated everything even more,” said Jonathan Wackrow, a risk management consultant and a former special agent with the U.S. Secret Service.
“The attack in Buffalo actually has a measured impact on this Roe decision and how people will will react to it,” he told Axios. “You see that people are willing to engage in the most violent acts in furtherance of that ideology.
Is it required to have the IQ of a slug to work for DHS now? Or simply being a dishonorable asshole willing to become a goon for a paycheck and a pension? Both?
So the court rules in favor of stopping abortion and the ones in FAVOR of this are going to attack the court???? Typical gubmint response..
I had thought that any false flag had to be credible. Perhaps not, in opposite world.
This is complete and utter lunacy.
Re “IQ of a slug” — I suppose so. Remember that you violate the Constitution simply by walking through the door of the DHS office, so a lack of brains certainly seems like a prerequisite.
They cancelled/paused the disinformation control board right before this gets leaked.
.
Coincidence? I think not.
The leadership of this administration is simply applying their antiwhite racism to the political reality that Blacks make up a third of the base democrat vote. If they don’t turn out the left loses. If they start voting Republican the left loses.
Mildly surprised they used the term “pro-life”, I’ve heard the word salad “anti-abortion rights activists” used repeatedly in other contexts.
We’ve gone Orwell. Of course they’ll create an Emmanuel Goldstein for the Two Minutes’ Hate. Though I have to tell you, Xou Bai-Din makes a pisspoor substitute Big Brother.
Obviously, the Deportment of Hopeless Stupidity has the Right mixed up with the Piranha Brothers.
“… they began to operate what they called ‘The Operation’. They would select a victim and then threaten to beat him up if he paid the so-called protection money. Four months later they started another operation which the called ‘The Other Operation’. In this racket they selected another victim and threatened not to beat him up if he didn’t pay them.”
By this logic, if the Court rules the way we want, we should burn it down.
Or… wait. Wasn’t there some legendary tyrant (the basis for at least one in the Discworld stories) who operated on this principle, having a great artist blinded or something to keep him from creating, in the future, some work of art greater than what he’d made for the tyrant? This leads to Progressive logic: once the Court had ruled the way they wanted, they should have burned it down to prevent future decisions that might be unfavorable.