You know and I know that eventually a parent is going to lose it and kill one of these sick bastards. A big show will be made of prosecuting the parent and the only chance we have to reverse this sick trend will be for the jury to render a verdict of Not Guilty.
That should serve to scare the rest of the Child Molesters into keeping their shit to a minimum, especially if it becomes a trend.
And now that has brought a though: The Emmett Till Antilynching Act. Was that created for what reason? There has not been an uptick of lynchings of Blacks or any other races anywhere for several decades. And I believe that all states have some sort of provisions against lynching plus murder is murder and still against the law in the 50 states. Maybe Congress is afraid people will lose its shit and start using fellow groomers as telephone pole decorations, so they inject the fear of the power of the Federal government to defend them?
We know the gubmint protects the sickest of humans and prosecute the lawful citizens. We have a prosecutor here who dismisses cases of violence where women are the defendants and throws the book at men… a city in Pennsylvania comes to mind of what must be done…
Unfortunately, you are correct. The first time one of these groomers gets it, the parent(s) will end up in jail for it. Whether you have a good reason or not, murder is still murder. Defending your five year old against “words” is not justification, sadly.
.
I think a few disappearances might start getting these groomers to wonder. If that does not work, a few hanging from branches, disfigured appropriately might send the message. Final step. Start hiring on the MS-13 gangbangers flooding across the border to hunt down and “help” these people see the error of their ways. We can call the program Aliens versus Predators.