Again I will post this quote:
Crime will expand according to our willing to put up with it.
California has put up with looting and it has expanded into lethal violence.
I can almost guarantee that no first time looters shoots a security guard. This is the work of a seasoned and emboldened looter.
Had California not allowed the situation to get this bad, this would not have happened.
Now here is the question I have. The demographic of the looters is well known. So much so that we’ve been told not to use the term “looting” to describe this mass theft because of its racist implications.
Given the identity of the victim and the probable identity of the looter shooter, how much traction do you think this story will get in changing California’s response to the looting.