by Berman (CO-SPONSORS) Cruz
Redefining the term “petitioner” to include an individual who has a biological or legal parent-child relationship with, who is a legal guardian of, or who is a spouse or sibling of a respondent, etc.
In the Senate’s Infrastructure and Security.
It expands the list of people seeking a Red Flag petition from just LEO to:
” an individual who has a biological or legal parent-child relationship with the respondent, including a stepparent-stepchild relationship and a grandparent-grandchild relationship; an individual who is the legal guardian of a respondent; an individual who is the spouse of a respondent; or a sibling of a respondent”
Why don’t we allow kin who don’t like us, a chance to screw with our lives? If his one passes and next year they will seek to include neighbors, co-workers, people in Facebook and kid who works at the Taco Bell drive-thru.

Risk Protection Orders -Red Flag Expansion – BAD BILL

Spread the love

By Miguel.GFZ

Semi-retired like Vito Corleone before the heart attack. Consiglieri to J.Kb and AWA. I lived in a Gun Control Paradise: It sucked and got people killed. I do believe that Freedom scares the political elites.

One thought on “Florida Gun Rights 2020 – SB 114 – Risk Protection Orders – Red Flag Expansion – BAD BILL”
  1. Surprised that a “participant in an intimate relationship” is not included.

    Give that p-ed off girlfriend a severely damaging tool to use if she catches you eyeballing another woman’s backside.

Login or register to comment.