Quote of the day—John Hoschen | The View From North Central Idaho

After 20 years of active duty military experience and nearly 30 years involved with professional civilian handgun training I have observed that:
1) Handguns are at best of tertiary interest to the Army.
2) The criteria used to select a handgun for the military includes several factors of very limited value to the civilian self-defense practitioner and fails to address several other factors which are critical to that user.
3) Only a VERY small minority of all military members EVER fire a handgun.
4) The training provided to the majority of military members who do fire a handgun is extremely rudimentary. (InSights General Defensive Handgun course is far more in depth and the material in our Intermediate Defensive Handgun course is not found in the military training system other than a few special operations schools.)
Based on the above observations it is my opinion that:What handgun the Army has chosen for standard issue should have exactly zero impact on what handgun a civilian should consider for self defense use.John HoschenMarch 3, 2017Via the InSights Training Center email list regarding the Sig P320
[I have nothing to add.—Joe]

Source: Quote of the day—John Hoschen | The View From North Central Idaho

Let me go again over #1: Handguns are at best of tertiary interest to the Army.

That means that they are an afterthought and may be carried by personnel because reasons and the learning and training on their use is scarcely sufficient. This is why I do not believe with feverish faith any handgun trainer whose experience is only or mostly military. There are great instructors that were former military, but they became great instructors by NOT following military doctrine but by attending classes in civilian life and adding to their knowledge.

2 Replies to “Quote of the day—John Hoschen | The View From North Central Idaho”

  1. As former USAF aircrew (B-52s), we only received training in handguns, and it was definitely rudimentary. Aircrew sitting nuclear alert were still issued .38 revolvers until standing alert ended in late ’91. It wasn’t until mid-’92 that we started qualifying on the M9.


  2. I am glad that the P320 was selected, but that’s because it’s what I’d picked for my own use after going to training classes, and army adoption means a huge additional amount of aftermarket support for it.



Feel free to express your opinions. Trolling, overly cussing and Internet Commandos will not be tolerated .