Saw this posted somewhere under the heading “Does HR 38 invalidate magazine limits in handguns?”:
“A person who carries or possesses a concealed handgun in accordance with subsections (a) and (b) may not be arrested or otherwise detained for violation of any law or any rule or regulation of a State or any political subdivision thereof related to the possession, transportation, or carrying of firearms unless there is probable cause to believe that the person is doing so in a manner not provided for by this section.”
I see this shit every time a new bill comes around. Why do people read shit that is not specifically there and immediately go for something they want? And the worst part is that if a legal experts explains why it is not the way they want it to be, they just huff and puff and ignore the advice starting a countdown to the moment he needs to call home and ask for bail money.
Don’t be stupid and get under the Legal Wishful Thinking.