Liberal journalist makes the case for campus carry

It’s been a while since I visited the issue of campus carry.

I’ve covered idiot professors claiming that campus carry infringes on free speech because they are afraid that gun carrying, conservative students would hear that Mao was a good guy and shoot up the place.

Of course, what we’ve actually seen is progressive students and student groups threaten conservative students with violence.

This time it was writer* Jesse Farrar who made a clear and compelling case for campus carry.

*Farrar has written articles for garbage online magazines like Deadspin as The Beer Idiot.  Technically, he gets paid to write, so that makes him a writer, but his work, just like soul, is utter shit.

Grabbed by snipping tool from Charlie Kirk, because the original tweet has been deleted.


Yes, you read all of that right.  This person is actually advocating that professors murder conservative students over ideological differences.

I see now why professors are scared of campus carry.

Prof: “Mao was the good guy.”

Student: “Professor, Mao starved 50 million people to death and murdered millions more in show trials.”

Prof: *Attempts to murder student for challenging Communist ideology.*

Student: *Shoots professor who is trying to strangle him.*


At least Farrar had the balls to admit that he’s for the mass murder of people he disagrees with.  It allows the rest of us to understand exactly what kind of person he is.

Nothing says Progressive like convincing people your ideology is right by filling graves with everybody that disagrees with you.

5 Replies to “Liberal journalist makes the case for campus carry”

  1. And progressives are always quick to tell us how violence never solves anything, yet it solved plenty from their end. 120 million (at a minimum) dead at the hands of the progressives in the last 100 years. They “solved” a lot with their violence. The dead cannot counter their stupidity, argue against them with either passion or logic, or shoot them dead when they come for the next group in the middle of the night.

    1. Liberals/Progressives know that Heinlein was right when he said:

      “Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its worst. Breeds that forget this basic truth have always paid for it with their lives and their freedoms.”

      The truth us, they want you to forget it so they can make you pay with your lives and your freedom.

      They don’t want YOU to be violent. They only want the state forces that you control to be violent. Why do you think the mantra is “only military and police should have guns.” Because the seek to control the military and police, and use violence against you.

    2. I remember an editorial in the local weekly paper years ago, where the editor claimed that “violence never solves anything”. I wrote a sarcastic reply asking if he had heard of WW2, which certainly solved some things. It seemed like a good observation given that the editor supposedly was a WW2 vet, i.e., he should have known better. But his progressivism apparently overrode his experience.

Feel free to express your opinions. Trolling, overly cussing and Internet Commandos will not be tolerated .

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.