J. Kb

Classic signs of abuse

https://twitter.com/ArchdukeSippy/status/1546533440714985472?t=k2gcREiRKAiRglkR9veecQ&s=19

 

I’m calling it.

Joe fucked Hunter as a little kid.

Everything about Hunter’s behavior, the drug abuse, prostitution, banging his brother’s widow, this shit with his niece, it is all the classic symptoms of a child who was sexually abused by an elderly family member.

He is incapable of having a normal sexual relationship.  He is incapable of separting sex from platonic familial love.  And he is self medicating his trauma with the hardest narcotics he can find.

I guarantee you that Hunter has said as much and maybe even has proof of it in his files somewhere.

The conclusion is inescapable.

Michael Moore reinvented the 18th Amendment with the 28th

Michael Moore, who everyday looks more and more like an old lesbian cat lady, decided to draft his perfect Constitutional Amendment to eliminate our right to keep and bare arms.

XXVIII AMENDMENT

SECTION 1.
The inalienable right of a free people to be kept safe from gun violence and the fear thereof must not be infringed and shall be protected by the Congress and the States. This Amendment thus repeals and replaces the Second Amendment.

SECTION 2.
Congress shall create a mandatory system of firearm registration and licensing for the following limited purposes: (a) licensed hunters of game; (b) licensed ranges for the sport of target shooting; and (c) for the few who can demonstrate a special need for personal protection.

All who seek a firearm will undergo a strict vetting process with a thorough background check, including the written and confidential approval of family members, spouses and ex-spouses and/or partners and ex-partners, co-workers and neighbors. A mental health check will also be required. There will be a waiting period of one month to complete the full background check.

SECTION 3.
Those who meet all the requirements for the restricted gun owners groups and successfully pass the background check must take a firearms safety class and pass a written test on an annual basis.

SECTION 4.
The minimum age for the restricted groups who can own a firearm is 25 years old. Renewal and review of the firearms license will occur on an annual basis.
Share

SECTION 5.
Congress will stipulate and continually update the limited list of approved firearms for civilian use, including weapons in the future that are not yet invented. The following firearms are heretofore banned:

• All automatic and semi-automatic weapons and all devices which can enable a single-shot gun to fire automatically or semi-automatically;

• Any weapon that can hold more than six bullets or rounds at a time or any magazine that holds more than six bullets;

• All guns made of plastic or any homemade equipment and machinery or a 3D printer that can make a gun or weapon that can take a human life.

SECTION 6.
Congress shall regulate all ammunition, capacity of ammunition, the storage of guns, gun locks, gun sights, body armor and the sale and distribution of such items. No weapons of any kind whose sole intention is the premeditated elimination of human life are considered legal. Congress may create future restrictions as this amendment specifically does not grant any American the “right” to own any weapon.

SECTION 7.
Police who are trained and vetted to use firearms shall be subject to comprehensive and continuous monitoring and shall be dismissed if found to exhibit any racist or violent behavior.

SECTION 8.
Persons already owning any of the above banned firearms, and who do not fall into the legal groups of restricted firearms owners, will have one month from the ratification of this Amendment to turn in their firearms for destruction by local law enforcement. These local authorities may organize a gun buy-back program to assist in this effort.

First and foremost, it is an grotesque affront to our Constitution that any Amendment exist to curtail the freedoms of Americans.

Our Constitution exists to limit the powers of Government, not the people.

Only one previous Amendment has ever done that and it was the 18th Amendment instituting prohibition.  It was repealed by the 21st Amendment 14 years later.

Any true American who understands the point of our Constitution would be offended by the idea of another Amendment restricting the rights of the people.  But Moore is a Progressive, like the Progressives of the temperance movement, and he believes he can make the world better by restricting rights.

A more specific reading of his Amendment shows that it is impossible.

The inalienable right of a free people to be kept safe from gun violence and the fear thereof must not be infringed and shall be protected by the Congress and the States.

Exactly how is this enforced?  How does the government keep you safe from gun violence and fear?  Does law enforcement not try to do that now?  Will making it a Constitutional Amendment make government more effective at doing what they are ineffective at doing?

But the biggest takeaway is that just like the 18th Amendment, this version of prohibition will also plunge the nation into a crime wave.

Will criminals who have guns give them up?  Doubtful, because currently they don’t despite state laws.

Law abiding citizens will be disarmed and preyed upon.

The demand for guns by criminals and the previously law abiding who want to own them will create a massive black market.  Crime empires will rise on the trade if illegal guns.  It will be war in the streets.

The federal government will create new federal law enforcement bureaucracies and freedom restricting laws to try and stop the problem they created.

It will be the Roaring 20s all over again, but worse.

But at least Moore can feel like his did something.

I almost feel bad for Hunter Biden

 

Why would a guy film this and upload it?

Clearly he has something very wrong with him.

The drug abuse and sexual proclivities, I suspect that he was severely abused as a child.

This is a grown man with severe daddy issues.

If he wasn’t such a corrupt piece of shit that has aided the corruption of the presidency, I’d feel bad for him.

And it’s obvious that Joe did horrible things to Hunter to turn him into that.

Astronauts for dinner

Five hundred thousand calories.

I need five hundred thousand calories or I am going to die.

Maybe less, I’m doing back-of-the-envelope, easy numbers head math, but that’s a good estimate.

Scientists like precise numbers, NASA is full of scientists who love really precise numbers.  I’m an engineer.  I like easy numbers that I can crunch quickly in my head and if they are accurate enough to be within the tolerance that I need, good enough.

I’m sure at least one scientist back home has calculated down to the third fucking decimal point exactly how many calories I need but I don’t have a spare fuck to give for that level of precision at the moment.

Alright, let’s go over the situation.

I’m an astronaut aboard the Iris.  We were on the final leg of our mission to Mars.  Actually, we had been to Mars and were returning home when docking with the shuttle went badly.

Badly is a bit of an understatement.  We fucking collided.

The Iris is in constant transit between Earth and Mars.  It never stops, it doesn’t enter orbit around either body.  It just goes back and forth between the two planets.

This is the most energy-efficient way to conduct multiple Mars missions.  A shuttle takes a crew from Earth and docks with the Iris as the Iris approaches Earth.  The new crew boards the Iris and transfers all the supplies they need with them.  The old crew enters the shuttle with the samples they collected from Mars, undocks, and returns to Earth.  Once the Iris reaches Mars, the process repeats.  The crew that was just on Mars takes a shuttle up to Iris with their samples, and the crew that boarded from Earth nine months before takes the shuttle down to Mars with the rest of their supplies.

This whole process is about conserving energy in order to conserve fuel.  Because Iris never enters orbit, it is on a pseudo-free return trajectory from Earth to Mars and back again.

All rocket engines work the same way, all based on Newton’s third law of motion.  A rocket pushes something out the back in one direction.  That pushes the body of the rocket in the other direction.  The force the rocket engine pushes the body of the rocket with, we call thrust.  Most people are familiar with chemical rocket engines.  Fuel and oxygen are mixed in a chamber and ignited.  Hot gas shoots out the back of the rocket engine pushing the rocket.

That works very well for short durations.  Lots of fuel is consumed to generate lots of thrust very quickly.  That’s not so good for long-duration space travel.

For that, a ship like the Iris is powered by ion engines.  Ion engines use electricity to propel ionized gas at extremely high velocity.  Remember that force is mass times acceleration.  Chemical rockets use huge amounts of mass and accelerate it to supersonic speed.  The Saturn V main engines had an exhaust gas velocity of approximately 2,400 meters per second or Mach 7.

Ion engines use very little exhaust mass but propel it at 50 kilometers per second, or more than 20 times the exhaust velocity of a chemical rocket.

This allows a spaceship to generate thrust with very little fuel consumption.  We don’t count electricity because the Iris is powered by a nuclear reactor like a submarine.  We only concern ourselves with the amount of xenon gas we have to have.

The downside to ion engines is that the way they produce thrust means that they produce low amounts of thrust for long periods of time.  Chemical engines, conversely, produce high amounts of thrust for short periods of time.  It’s the difference between total impulse and specific impulse and gets into all sorts of rocket efficiency technical bullshit that gives aerospace and propulsion engineering a hard-on that really doesn’t matter right now.

Suffice it to say, when the Iris has a problem, we can’t just flip the ship around and fire up the engines and go home.

I am along for the ride.  At best, I can fire up the engines and accelerate towards Mars, slingshot around it as fast as possible without launching myself out toward Jupiter, then decelerate hard as I approach Earth and cut some of my travel time, but there is no way of making a U-turn and going straight home.

So…

The shuttle collided with us as we approached Earth.

Our replacement crew was killed.

The entire docking assembly was ripped open and the rest of my crew was killed.

I was busy in the engine compartment preparing to transfer ship’s maintenance to the next engineer, which is why I survived when the forward compartment decompressed.

The automated ship systems did what they were designed to do and put us back on course.

That was the problem.  trans

During the collision, our communication system was damaged.  NASA sent a signal to Iris to go into emergency park mode and enter orbit around Earth.  Iris never read the signal and so continued on her merry way back to Mars.

Why didn’t I do anything to try and fly the ship?

One, I’m not a pilot.

Two, we don’t actually fly the fucking ship from up here.

Remember everything I said about how ion engines work?  It’s not like we have a joystick and can pilot the ship like a jet.  Some big supercomputer back on Earth calucaltes the most fuel-efficient trajectory it can and transmits that to Iris so it can adjust its trajectory over days and weeks of trust at a Newton at a time.

That’s why the ship’s internal computer is programmed with “in case of emergency, resume pre-planned trajectory.”

So now I’m headed back to Mars.

Seven months out, Seven months back.  Give or take a little bit.

Hence my need for five hundred and forty thousand calories or I am going to die.

It should be a lot more than that.  NASA plans on us having between 2,100 and 2,800 calories per day, but I don’t have that.

As an adult human male, I can survive at about 1,200 calories per day.  It will suck.  It will suck a lot, but it’s doable.  Below 1,000 calories per day, I’ll die.

Fourteen months at 1,200 calories per day, that’s five hundred and four thousand calories.  Call it five hundred thousand because I don’t have any spare fucks for that last four thousand to carry over in my math.

NASA sends us up with prepared meals, each one containing 1,250 calories.  We were a crew of six.  One day’s worth of meals for the entire crew is 22,500 calories.

I’m set right?

Wrong.

The number one concern of any and every space flight is weight.  We’re always worried about weight.

Force is mass times acceleration.  Thrust is force.  Trust comes from fuel.  The more mass you have to accelerate to launch velocity the more fuel it takes.

Weight, weight, weight, weight, fucking weight.

These missions are highly planned.  Everyone has their food rationed out over the course of the mission.  Ideally, we don’t want to have any more weight than we need so we don’t carry more food than we need for the mission.  We have a little bit of wiggle room so in stores we have one week of extra rations.  There were two days left in the mission for our transfer window.  So I have nine days worth of food for a crew of six.

That is a total of 162 food packs or 202,500 calories.  God dammit, I’m going to have to get precise with my math.  Fuck!

Stretch that out on 1,200 calories per day, or just under one food pack per day, and let’s say that’s 170 days’ worth of food.

Great.

That brings me most of the way to Mars.

Why am I focused on food?  Why not air or water?  That’s the first thing you learn in survival training.  Three minutes without air, three days without water, or three weeks without food is what it takes to kill you.

I have air and water.  I have it in abundance.  I have enough air for a crew of six and it is on a closed-loop replenishment system.  Even after the forward compartment decompressed, refilling it with air from the reserves, I have plenty.  Water is also a closed-loop, and I have enough for a crew of six.

Food is the one resource that isn’t on a closed-loop.

I’m not even going to entertain the idea of trying to make it one.

I have under half as much food as I need.

What about the crew currently on Mars?

Fuck ’em.  I know that sounds mean but without the resupply, I don’t have food for their return trip either.  They aren’t bringing any food up from Mars with them.  And with the docking assembly gone, they can’t get aboard anyway.  NASA is going to have to figure out how to help them without the Iris.

I need to focus on myself.  What are my options?

Die. I can always die.  But I don’t really want to do that.

I need to make up a difference of 300,000 calories and I’m not growing fucking potatoes on a spaceship.

What do I have?

I have 162 prepared meal packets, a bunch of rocks and shit from Mars, a mostly intact spaceship, and… fuck…

Decompression in a spaceship is not like what you see in the movies.  The ship doesn’t explode and blow everything out into space.  The air vents but most of what is in the ship stays in the ship.

Lean pork is roughly 1,100 calories per pound.  Give or take, roughly 60% of a live harvested animal becomes food.

A 180 lbs pig is roughly 120,000 calories after processing.

Long pig is what some tribes in the Pacific Islands called it.

I have five crew members.

No, I have five long pig vacuum frozen in the forward compartment.

At 120 to 180 lbs each, I have almost half a million calories of unprocessed lean long pork aboard.

It wouldn’t be difficult to recover with an EVA one at a time as needed.  Out the EVA airlock, around to the docking assembly, manually open the docking door, …, and return.

I have a microwave oven.  I have tools.

I have fourteen months to fix the communications system and work out a plan with NASA on how to get me off this interplanetary meat locker.

I have enough calories.

I will survive.

 

Sergent O’Sullivan swore her oath to Roe

 

She is an E5, a sergeant and the lowest rank of NCO.

NCOs are the backbone of the military.

Apparently when she swore her oath as an NCO she swore it to Roe v Wade and not the United States Constitution.

That states now have the ability to regulate abortion based on the will of the citizens of that state means that she can no longer be a loyal soldier of this nation’s military.

I’ve been saying this for some time, our military is being turned into an institution that doesn’t swear allegiance to the Constitution and defends this nation and her citizens, but an institution that swears allegiance to the Woke bureaucracy and defends the Democrat party.

Bruren broke Maryland’s email system

 

Maryland is dealing with an “exponential increase” in applications for wear and carry gun permits, according to State Police.

In fact, there’s been such a surge, Maryland’s online licensing portal is having trouble keeping up.

A spokesperson said Friday that the MSP online licensing system is restricted to 10,000 outgoing emails per rolling 24-hour period. As a result of the massive increase in applications, they’ve gone over the limit for two straight days, preventing automated email communication with applicants.

The demand is high.

The permitting process is as strict as Illinois’ with 16 hours of training required.

But it seems that at least 20,000 Marylanders are willing to go through it to get permits.

It’s going to be amazing how Bruen will affect states.

Currently there are over 21 million issued carry permit in the US.

We might see easily a 20% to 30% increase in that number as may issue states go shall issue.

I’ll laugh if California beats Florida for total number of permits issued.

 

The Inquirer publishes an incredible OpEd

If you legally qualify for a gun permit, you should get one

The Supreme Court was right — New York’s decision to place an additional restriction on concealed carry permits was ripe for abuse.

[O]n June 23, the court held that New York’s restrictive law violated the Second and 14th Amendments to the Constitution.

What does that mean to those of us in Pennsylvania? Absolutely nothing. The law in this commonwealth, as in more than 40 other states, was already in line with what the court said the Constitution requires. That’s because Pennsylvania is what’s known as a “shall issue” state; New Jersey and Delaware, however, are “may issue” states.

A shall-issue state like Pennsylvania will issue a concealed carry permit to anyone who meets the legal requirements. That doesn’t mean just anyone can get a permit — the law carves out several groups including convicted felons, people “not of sound mind,” and “habitual drunkards.” But if you are legally qualified, you get the permit.

New York’s law — like New Jersey’s — was more subjective. In New York, as a “may issue” state, the government may issue you a license if you meet the criteria, but they can also choose not to if the state believes applicants haven’t demonstrated a “proper cause” for having a license and proven it to the satisfaction of a “licensing officer” — a judge in most counties, but the local police or county sheriff in others.

In no other circumstances do we require people to apply to the subjective judgment of a cop or judge before they can exercise a right. If this were any other civil right, New York’s law would have long ago set off alarm bells in the minds of liberals.

Between 1998 and 2020, the percentage of people with concealed carry permits nationwide has grown by more than sixfold, yet for most of those years (until 2020) the murder rate declined. The rate of violent crime overall declined even more sharply.

Our state does not break down crime data into permit holders vs. non-permit holders, but one state that does, Michigan, found that out of more than 750,000 permit holders in 2021, only four were convicted of homicide. That’s a rate of 0.53 per 100,000 — compared with 7.4 per 100,000 in the state as a whole. The rate for all crimes was 1,856 per 100,000; for permit holders, it was 177 per 100,000.

The changes that will follow in New York and New Jersey after Bruen will not make people there more safe or less safe. What they will do is bring order and equality to the administration of a constitutional right, guaranteeing that all applicants for permits will be treated equally under the law. Equal justice under the law should be uncontroversial in a democratic republic.

Everything said is both factually correct and reasonable.

Every time concealed carry rights are expanded the Left clutches its pearls and cries that every uncouth social interaction will become a shootout.

It never happens.

In a city like New York, the number of carry permits will not move the needle substantially on the crime rate.  But the argument for concealed carry isn’t a collective one (it will change the crime rate), it’s an individual one (it will protect the permitted person from being a victim).

And once again, we see how the Left treats guns separate from every other right.

Perhaps a man should have to obtain a permit that shows “just cause” to dress as a woman and dance outside of his home.  See how long it takes for the Left to drag that one to court.

I’m amazed to see this OpEd printed in a newspaper in a Blue city.