This is from the Wall Street Journal:

America’s Industrial Base Isn’t Ready for War With China

The war in Ukraine should galvanize Washington policy makers. It has demonstrated that America’s defense-industrial base isn’t up to the job of supplying the U.S. military with weapons for a prolonged conventional conflict with a major power such as China. Production lines for Stinger and Javelin missiles destined for Ukraine are stretched to capacity, with critical components no longer produced in sufficient quantity to meet demand.

The industrial competencies required for sustained conventional warfare have atrophied. In 2018 the Trump administration identified nearly 300 significant gaps across 10 “risk archetypes” in the defense industry, such as reliance on a foreign supplier, that could directly undermine the U.S. military’s ability to fight a major war. The causes of these gaps vary and are subject to debate. They range from the general decline of domestic manufacturing to Congress’s failure to ensure a predictable defense-funding cycle and from the predatory industrial policies of other nations to an assumption that America’s future wars would be quick and decisive. Whatever the causes, the status quo is profoundly dangerous.

During the Cuban Missile Crisis, the U.S. had 28 shipyards capable of building oceangoing naval or merchant-marine vessels. The Navy’s ship-repair facility on Guam was closed in the 1990s, requiring substantial repair work for U.S. submarines to occur on this side of the Pacific. Only two naval shipyards and fewer than 20 dry docks remain in the Pacific Fleet area of operations, well below what the Navy needs. Most harbor cranes—essential for ship repair and construction—are built abroad, and often in China. In the event of a war, the Navy would have a hard time repairing its ships

Without a defense-industrial base that can rapidly produce and repair platforms and munitions, America’s military will be like a great football team that can play only through the first quarter. To address this weakness, the administration and Congress must make immediate, targeted investments. These should be focused on air, naval, space and munitions capabilities, including private and public shipyards, ship-repair facilities and associated infrastructure.

The U.S. may soon need to fight and win a more intense war than it has faced in decades. China won’t be deterred unless it sees that the U.S. is ready, and the industrial base is essential to that. There is no time to waste.

This article was written by Elbridge Colby, who according to his biography is:

Mr. Colby is a principal at the Marathon Initiative. He served as deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development (2017-18). Mr. Gray is a senior adviser at the Marathon Initiative. He served as special assistant to the president for the defense industrial base (2017-18) and chief of staff of the National Security Council (2019-21).

Mr. Colby is right but missed a YUGE part of the problem.

It’s not just our defense manufacturing base, it’s our entire manufacturing base.

Our cranes from from China, but so does much of the steel to make them.

Along with the loss of manufacturing, we’ve lost the people and skills to have WWII level production.  We have atrophied across the board.

We can’t just have defense manufacturing.   We have to have manufacturing in every sector do those skilled people and resources have the ability to move and develop.

We retooled tractor factories to make tanks, and the same people who welded bucket loader bucket and forged caterpillar treads could easily transition to welding armor plate and making tank treads.

Without other manufacturing, defense manufacturing cannot survive on it’s own.

What wasn’t said, probably because this is a Wall Street publication, is that this was done to America by the financial sector.

Every outsourced job, every factory closed down and moved overseas was another Jenga block pulled out of our infrastructure base.

We were told it would make us better and our goods cheaper.

It didn’t.

It just made the financial sector richer, the middle-class poorer, and the country less strategically safe.

I know that I have become an extremist in many ways.

This was done to me.

I used to be the libertarian guy who said “of course Rubbermaid had to shut down production in South Carolina, it’s cheaper to make trash cans in China, the market makes these decisions.”

I was wrong.

We undermined our economy, our workforce, and our self sufficiency as a nation for the profit of holding companies.

So now I want to course correct, and harshly.

If tye government want to give tax incentives to build up domestic manufacturing, fine.

But I also want to take the financial, management, and consultants who did this in the first place and put them to the wall for treason.

Then I want to dump their bodies in board rooms across the country and say “you will figure out how to make America self sufficient on manufacturing again or I will have you shot for treason as well.”


Spread the love

By J. Kb

5 thoughts on “The economic sabotage of America”
  1. Dibs relying on foreign suppliers = raw materials = China.

    Work force issues too. Lots of these mom and pop places have paid like shit for years and haven’t adjusted to the new paradigm yet. Country club mentality lots of people have who work for the big bois isn’t helping either.

    Lots of NIMBY people now too; they want all the nice stuff but not the environmental costs it takes to produce that nice stuff. So they are content to have brown people do it over there instead of seeing (and smelling) an unsightly chemical plant or a mine etc.

  2. Long ago when “nafta” was being bantered about I said who is going to buy these “cheaper” goods?? No one will have a job. Trumpy tried to get us going again and would have had success given more time. Again thanks goes out to democrats the ruiners of everything.

  3. One of the reasons we transitioned from a peace time to a full wartime economy so fast (six to nine months) in WWII was because much of out industrial infrastructure, including trained personnel, was idle or at reduced production due to the great depression. We were slowly ramping up the transition to support Lend Lease. With Pearl Harbor, we went into “warp speed.” The government stepped in, allocated production facilities, established pricing, told the unions, no strikes for the duration or we’ll bring in the military, and of course no EPA, OSHA, or Environmental Impact Statements existed. The only criteria was can you produce the needed materiel in the time allotted. With today’s bureaucracy, and level of out sourcing, The war will be over before the keel is laid on the first new warship.

    1. This. It’s hard to appreciate the sheer magnitude of regulatory and compliance overhead involved with doing, well, anything … building something, buying something, whatever, until you’ve tried to get something done yourself. And if it’s at all outside “normal” parameters, e.g. actually trying to do something new, well… one best have lots of patience.

Only one rule: Don't be a dick.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.