One of the things they demand is Zero Emissions of Greenhouse gases by 2025 which would include zero emissions of carbon dioxide.
That means every living aerobic creature on earth has to be eliminated by 2025, including lovely penguins and the cute birds in the rainforest and also the rain forest and every vegetation in the planet.
The idiots are demanding total immolation. Once again, they are effing clowns sporting the latest political fashion.
Now if they really want to cut down in Human-produced greenhouse gasses, they can always go the Jim Jones Kool-Aid therapy.
5 thoughts on “Thinking about the idiots of Extinction Rebellion.”
From the pix, it appears that their banner is made from (gasp) vinyl plastic made from petroleum.
There’s a lot of new looking name brand clothing in that picture. I wonder how many non-renewable resources were used to make it all.
Let’s put the hypocrisy aside for a second and realize one important factor with idiots like this.
They honestly do not believe that they will be adversely effected by their proposals.
Sure, they realize that electricity will get a bit pricier if we go all wind and solar, but the thought that rolling black and brown outs might happen will never cross their mind. (See CA) And, to compound the situation, a number of them will actually welcome them. (Virtue signaling at its best.)
For whatever reason, they actually believe that organic farming will produce as much, if not more, food than conventional farming techniques. (Despite numerous examples of the opposite happening.) For whatever reason, they will continue to get their organic fair trade whatever without any interruption in service.
The term I am looking for is magical thinking. It is the belief, beyond all evidence to the opposite, that it will work out perfectly this time. “It was not real socialism” is the phrase heard most often. And, that same magical thinking applies to eco-warriors, feminists, etc… etc.. etc… Any …ist or …ism that is being pushed by the left is base on magical thinking.
“A woman can be just as good of a CEO as a man” is probably not an incorrect statement, but just because she is a woman does not mean she is qualified. There are dozens of examples where a woman was made CEO because of her plumbing, not because of her skills. And, the companies suffered because of it.
But… it will work out right this time.
And let me be clear here, I am not picking on women here. Substitute any other “protected” group for women in my example above, and the statement remains the same.
It is EXACTLY the same type if intellectual blindness that made the leftist think 16 year olds should be allowed to vote because of the camera Hogg and some mentally ill Swedish girl whose (apparently) only contribution to society is scowling.
Yep – the ‘it won’t happen to me’ syndrome is alive and well (not) with this crowd. Much like the latest batch of commies always think that this time they will get it correct………….
Login or register to comment.