The Left has already began to form a defensive narrative to explain why alleged mass killed Darrell Brooks did what he did.

And again, there is a problem: There is video of the burgundy SUV going through the parade and there is something missing in all of the takes.

Not once can you see if he is being chased by anybody.

Not once you can hear him blowing the horn to get people out of the way. And why would you augment a simple stabbing by running over a crowd of grandmothers and teen girls?

Not once he is seen slowing down.

So, he was fleeing what exactly? I am guessing he was not fleeing squat, but a narrative must be formed ASAP as not to lose the faux indignation momentum of the Rittenhouse verdict.


PS: And if it seems that is actions are indefensible, bury the story.  Maybe nobody will notice. Ostrich journalism.

Hat Tips to Sean Sorrentino and KevinB


UPDATE: He was not being pursued.

Spread the love

By Miguel.GFZ

Semi-retired like Vito Corleone before the heart attack. Consiglieri to J.Kb and AWA. I lived in a Gun Control Paradise: It sucked and got people killed. I do believe that Freedom scares the political elites.

16 thoughts on “Waukesha Vehicular Mass Killing: The defensive narrative of Darrell Brooks is forming. UPDATE: First Narrative dies.”
  1. You’re spot on. I’d be willing to bet this was a revenge murder spree for the Rittenhouse verdict, and the abject vermin in the MSM are spinning the yarn about him fleeing another crime as the absolute last resort defense.

  2. Such bullshit from the main medias as usual: they call Darrell Brooks the alleged suspect in the accident in Waukesha. It’s not an accident, he is not an alleged suspect, we all know he did the crime! So depressing to start the week with “news” like this!

    1. Putting on my devil’s advocate cap here: he has not been convicted in a court of law. It would be as inappropriate as referring to Rosenbaum, Huber, and Grosskreutz as ‘victims’.

  3. The NY Times has the story on the front page, but no name or photo of the alleged perpetrator. So they haven’t buried it yet but are trying very hard to hide the race of the perpetrator. Also the article ends with a capsule blurb about Waukesha citing how Republican it is, perhaps hinting they had it coming?

      1. The worst takes have been those talking about how ‘it was clearly self defense’.

        Because the lefties have been salty for a while about law changes which make it much more dangerous to play chicken with moving vehicles when you’re rioting, er, protesting.

  4. This story will be buried by Wednesday at the latest. While the media is all for and fully supports the murder of white people for being white and really want nothing less than the complete and total literal extermination of every single white person in the country not themselves and far leftist whites still it does not fit the narrative.

  5. I can imagine the first few minutes of the interview with Darrell Brooks.

    “Now shut up and listen asshole! Wisconsin does not have a death penalty. The Feds have a Death Penalty. If you say you ran down them crackers on purpose, that is Domestic Terrorism, and the Feds will execute your stupid ass. I repeat. Execute your stupid hateful ass.”

    “Now, If you were just fleeing a crime and accidentally ran over those people, then it is a state crime, and the worst you get is life in prison. Who knows, maybe a dumb ass governor will pardon you in 20 or 30 years? Think carefully before you say anything. So why were you fleeing a crime when you ran into all those people?”

    1. You’re not as cynical as me. He could admit the aforementioned and there’s no way the current administration’s DOJ would propose the death penalty. They might not even try very hard to prosecute him.

  6. What? There was no pursuit? Say it ain’t so! I’m glad I’m sitting down; you could knock me over with a feather!
    As a general rule, when the police chase someone in a car, they turn on their sirens. There were no references to sirens being heard on any of the videos, or in any of the news reports. In the biz, we call that a clue. (Also, there would be dashcam videos of a pursuit, but I don’t know what Wisconsin’s rules are on releasing them so soon after an incident.)

  7. There was a car, or at least an officer posted at the start of the parade route. He called in when the maroon (red) SUV blew though the white barricades in the street.. You can hear him on the scanner traffic. If you saw the video, the SUV broke the baricades into splinters. And to reinforce what Old1811 said, I heard no sirens on that video.

    Although to any normal driver, those barricades are what is called a “CLUE” the road may be blocked ahead, and a different road is a good idea.

    1. As a career criminal, “normal” clearly does not apply. The puzzle in my mind is why the authorities have quickly come to the conclusion that this is not a case of domestic terrorism. How would they know that? Is it a profiling decision that told them so?

  8. I find it noteworthy the the NY Post included a mug shot while the NY Times and AP did not. Apparently they are still bending over backwards to avoid saying the perp is black

Login or register to comment.