AOC wants her lies on the record

This is important, it puts her lies on record.

Here is why this is critical.

The speech and debate clause of the Constitution protects Members of Congress from libel and slander for things they say on the Floor.

This is how Harry Reid could say Mitt Romney never paid taxes and not get in trouble. He said it from the Floor.

If this is an official House activity, AOC can accused Republicans of anything and she’s protected by the speech and debate clause.

If there is a place for her to say “Rep/Senator [Republican] coordinated with people in the crowd to find and murder me,” she is not liable for slander.

IANAL, and I very well could be wrong, but I suspect that she’s been caught in a lie that is getting dangerously close to getting her into real legal trouble, and by making this airing of grievances a House function she’s invoking Constitution protection unique to Congress to continue to lie.

Spread the love

Gentlemen, call your divorce attorneys

A Leftist calling for ethnic (demographic) cleansing, how original.

It’s the responses by these women that I find shocking.

 

I hope their husbands see this.  You marry a woman, take care of her, build a life with her, and she agrees to have you sent away on a prison ship in order to virtue signal to a racist blue check mark 9n Twitter.

There was one Tweet I saw that was the absolute truth:

 

Amen.

“Mommy loves you, but mommy is willing to have you exiled so she can likes on Twitter.”

To the husbands of these women, take your children and go. Clearly your wives have had their brains rotted with Leftism.  Your wives love their Twitter likes from fellow travelers more than they love you.

Spread the love

I wish I knew how to fail upwards this hard

Be the corrupt, philandering, drug addict, embarrassing son of a politician capitalizing on daddy’s name, and get fat cash to write a book about how sympathetic you are.

Some people just have it made.

Spread the love

Whose side do you think the Reality Czar will come down on?

The New York Times recommended that Biden’s create a “Reality Czar” to counter “disinformation.”

How the Biden Administration Can Help Solve Our Reality Crisis
These steps, experts say, could prod more people to abandon the scourge of hoaxes and lies.

Several experts I spoke with recommended that the Biden administration put together a cross-agency task force to tackle disinformation and domestic extremism, which would be led by something like a “reality czar.”

I think “Minister of Truth” sounds better.  I never liked the idea of any appointed bureaucrat being called “Czar.”

But that point bring me to this?

From the ACLU:

Compare that to this:

So which reality is Czar approved?

The reality of three medical doctors publishing in a sports medicine journal or some lawyers with a Leftists lawfare group?

You know the answer, there are five lights and Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia

A Reality Czar won’t parse the truth, a Reality Czar will only make the Committee for State Reality force you to say 2+2=5.

Spread the love

I have a counter proposal – Update

From the Baltimore Sun:

 

As a former resident of Western South Dakota I can tell you that South Dakota and Wyoming are very different states, with different economies and different cultures.  Even the geography of the states are very different.

Hell, South Dakota itself is really two states joined together.  Western South Dakota is mining and ranching, Eastern South Dakota is farming.  Very differ cultures and that causes problems.

But this is how these assholes from the coasts think of “those big rectangular states.” As interchangeable.

They say this because they want power.  To remove our Senators and increase the number of their Senators.

So here is my proposal.

Create a minimum and maximum size requirement for a state based on area.  Coense Maryland, New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania into one state, then have everyone there go fuck themselves.

Connecticut, Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts can go next.

Sound fair, fuckers?

Update, sorry I included New Hampshire with those Massholes.  Sig Arms should not be put in with them.

I forgot about Rhode Island, but that can be forgiven, since even the Senator from Rhode Island doesn’t like his job since he spoke put against each state having two Senators.

Spread the love

100 yard revolver shot

Standing up, one handed, unsupported with a .357 Magnum.

and…

 

When I hear legislators complaining that civilians should not have guns because they then don’t have the same training as police of the military, I laugh and usually respond along the lines of: “Thank God we don’t. Our standards are much higher.”

Spread the love

Only one appropriate response

One of my favorite Twitter users asked this question:

The answer was “yes.”  This is what CNN did.

What fucking hack bullshit.

So lo and behold what else another media goon was doing on Twitter:

You know what they are going to do to any poor but well-intentioned soul who tries to explain all the very rational reasons why they thought they needed a gun after the events of 2020.

When a reporter askes you to give an interview on a topic you know they are against, there is only one appropriate response:

 

Spread the love