Gun Free Zone

Micheal Bloomberg gave a speech in Aurora, Colorado, in which he explained how he wants to destroy the right to keep and bear arms.

Bloomberg announces he wants a nationwide permit for people to obtain before being able to buy a gun: "I know critics will say that Americans shouldn't need a permit to exercise their constitutional rights, but voting is a constitutional right and we require people to register." pic.twitter.com/NCTpaIeCKb

— Julio Rosas (@Julio_Rosas11) December 5, 2019

He wants to make the US like New York City, where owning a gun is not a right but a privilege.

Right now, the Federal government has to have a reason to deny you a gun.  You have to be a felon, convicted of domestic violence, be adjudicated mentally ill, or meet one of the other prohibited person criteria.  If you are not a prohibited person and are of legal age, the default is your right to own a gun.

In New York City, it is exactly the opposite.  You have to have a permit to purchase a gun and the process is set up to default to deny applicants unless they are well connected or grease the requisite NYPD palms.

For Bloomberg, passing a background check at the time of sale is not enough.  He wants the ability to preemptively deny you the right to buy a gun.

“No matter what the background check says, can you stop them from getting a gun.”

It doesn’t matter if you are not a prohibited person, your right will be infringed upon.  Your rights can be denied even without a conviction in Bloomberg’s America.

He tries to justify this by comparing registering to vote to gun registration.

If he wants to make that comparison, I am all for having a lengthy discussion about restricting the franchise.  Like the great Robert A. Heinlein, I think it should be earned, but not limited to civil service.  Civil service is one way, but being a net positive taxpayer is sufficient.  If you get more money from the governor than you pay into it (exceptions for people on Social Security or Disability) you don’t get to vote.

But I have a feeling he’s not interested in kicking people on welfare off the voter rolls.

The reason voting registration exists and is important is for Congressional representation.  We need to make sure that a person votes only for the Congressional seat that they live in so that everyone gets adequate representation.  Without it, the Democrats in heavy blue districts could send some excess Democrat voters into low population density Republican districts to swing their elections.

There is no equivalent compelling reason to restrict gun rights.  When he invokes the right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” that is a call to restrict the power of government.

It is a complete inversion of our Founding Father’s intent to make the argument:

Big government must restrict the Constitutional rights of citizens so that free citizens do not threaten the liberty of other citizens.

This is an argument for the nanny state, of which Bloomberg is the self-appointed Handicapper General.

Hopefully, Bloomberg’s desire for a presidency based on tyrannical gun control falls as flat and Douche Nuk’em Swalwell’s, and that it takes his entire $54 Billion with him.

What I do know is that trying to impose that on Alabama will make the south rise again.

20 minute video so save it for a good coffee or liquor break.

I learned about and “met” Andrew via Twitter during the Zimmerman trial. He was actually doing an almost bow by blow description of the trial and his post summarizing what happened in court were on the money. Same as those who were following him, I was outraged at the whole sham trial and were happy when Zimmerman was acquitted.

I haven’t plugged his stuff for way to long so go ahead and start with his book and the progress with the rest of his products. It is the cheapest “insurance” in case of trouble you will ever get.

I should say knickers’ twisting, I guess.

She feels properly disturbed by this. What does it take to be improperly disturbed.

Hat Tip Mad Ogre.

Al Green is one of the worst members of Congress.  He is one of the dumbest and most corrupt members of Congress, using taxpayer money to settle sexual harassment claims against himself.

He’s also a one-trick pony, accusing anyone and every one of racism as leverage.

So agreeing with him is something I’d never thought I do, until yesterday.

‘Not one person of color’: Congressman scolds fellow Democrats for choosing only white impeachment witnesses

Here is my problem.

The three professors called by the Democrats, Noah Feldman, Pamela Karlan, and Michael Gerhardt, are all Jewish.  Feldman and Karlan were obnoxiously Jewy.  They were also obnoxiously hyper-partisan schmucks from Harvard and Stanford, respectively, typifying the elitist, Leftist,  Ivy Leave, bubble.

Shiff, who has been leading this impeachment Court of Star Chamber from the Intelligence Committee and Nadler, leading the Judiciary Committee kangaroo court impeachment are also Jewish.

If I didn’t know any better, I could surmise that it is a Jewish conspiracy to take down Donald Trump.

I don’t know if this is deliberate or not, but holy-fucking-shit does it look bad.

This is the kind of thing that pours fuel onto the alt-right fires of anti-Semitism.

Maybe that’s the point.  If the Democrats can tamp down the anti-Semitism on their side, they just fan the flames of it on the other side to scare moderate Jews back to the Left.  Because the impeachment hearing is going nowhere and is turning moderates against the Democrats.

All I know is that I fucking hate it.

Reader Divemedic provided the link to the text of Zimmerman’s Civil Lawsuit. If what is being stated is true, not only $100 million seems little, but some people may need to search for Non-Extradition countries ASAP.

Plaintiff George Zimmerman (“Zimmerman”) brings this action against Sybrina Fulton (“Fulton”), Rachel Jeantel (“Jeantel”), Brittany Diamond Eugene (“Eugene”), Tracy Martin (“Tracy Martin”), Benjamin Crump (“Crump”), Bernie de la Rionda (“de la Rionda”), John Guy (“Guy”), Angela Corey (“Corey”), the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (“FDLE”), and the State of Florida (“Florida”) in their individual and official capacities where applicable for violations of Zimmerman’s constitutional rights under the Florida Constitution, as well as the United States Constitution, as well as the common law, for conspiring to switch and/or cover up the identity of Defendant Eugene who was the real phone witness to the events prior to Trayvon Martin’s (“Trayvon Martin”) death, by substituting an imposter and fake witness, Defendant Jeantel, and to assist Defendant Jeantel in committing perjury in sworn testimony to cause the arrest, prosecution, and sentencing to life in prison of George Zimmerman, as well as causing a federal investigation and prosecution of Zimmerman for civil rights violations.

What Zimmerman and his lawyer are saying is that not only Miss “I Can’t Read Cursive” was lying on the stand, she was not even the real person who was on the phone with Trayvon but an imposter and that everybody in the  prosecution side of the trial knew it and abetted the… I have no idea what to call this other than major legal fraud.  Maybe an almost successful legal lynching.

Again, if they have the evidence supporting this, there is a caca storm coming to Florida’s Justice system and Zimmerman deserves every penny of that lawsuit.

After the latest change in Twitter, you may or may not have noticed that the trend feed is a bit different as in “WTF is this shit even in my results?”

I keep mine in Venezuela as to check the latest down there, but for the last several days although it is still set for it, I am getting results I know do not fit with what usually comes out from down there:

I doubt pretty much anybody down there cares about the shooting at Pearl Harbor,  knows what Fake Outrage is (language and all) and could not give to craps about Pelosi.

I went ahead and checked other countries’ trends and according to Twitter, the whole planet is pretty much talking about the same thing:

According to Twitter:

Trends are determined by an algorithm and, by default, are tailored for you based on who you follow, your interests, and your location. This algorithm identifies topics that are popular now, rather than topics that have been popular for a while or on a daily basis, to help you discover the hottest emerging topics of discussion on Twitter.

Bolds are mine. Help me? I am always suspicious when my information feed is being “helped” by people I do not know and the outcome is the disappearance of such information.

You can choose to see trends that are not tailored for you by selecting a specific trends location on twitter.com, iOS, or Android (instructions below). Location trends identify popular topics among people in a specific geographic location.

Well little one, that ain’t happening, is it? I am sure that the connotation of “ass” in three of the four countries above is not an expression of disbelief but a pack animal and very likely not the top five of their Twitter discussions. Now I cannot even believe what is being shown “trending” in my particular location is truthful because as much as I may like Egypt and its history, I doubt Miami and El Cairo have the same similar concerns this morning.

But no, we are not being informational manipulated for upcoming elections. Trust Without Verify.

UPDATE: I sent a notification to @TwitterHelp and my trends are back to normal. I guess somebody forgot to flip a switch after the last update. I can no keep track of the triumph of Socialism in Venezuela over the evil US Empire…or crap like that.

Dear Lord, George Zimmerman has riled up a lot of media people again.

The Zimmerman case was made up of pure political lust and the ultimate use of the race card. So much so that a new type of white race was created so they could be have a bad guy as mandated by the Race Baiters. It does not matter that the initial investigation supported Zimmerman’s account, it does not matter that the DOJ and the FBI looked into the case and quickly walked away from it for lack of evidence. The only thing that mattered was to have a legal lynching in the era of Obama so a police chief was sacked, Media was caught editing the 911 call to make Zimmerman sound racist and poison the jury pool, a state prosecutor with stars in her eyes ordered an arrest and presented an affidavit to the court that was called shameful by Liberal Legal Eagle Alan Dershowitz and George Zimmerman went to legal hell for political benefit.

But back to the Herald. This caught my immediate attention

A struggle ensued and the teen was fatally wounded by the armed Zimmerman. Zimmerman’s attorney used the Stand Your Ground defense in his 2013 trial.

This is a Florida Liberal mantra. Stand Your Ground is still hated by the Media and the Liberal clique. Every Legal “expert” was brought in front of a camera and they explained to the public that more than likely, Zimmerman’s lawyers would demand to be tried via Stand Your Ground.

They didn’t. They went straight for a case of self defense. The Herald knows this, they covered the trial in depth and they have been corrected over and over every time the repeat the same error/falsehood. It leads you to think that they may be lying on purpose just because they can get away again and again.

And if lying is not enough:

But back to Zimmerman’s lawsuit: Setting aside the arrogance, irony and the merits of the case aside, we have one wish for Zimmerman, who’s turned into a bad penny since this tragedy occurred..

Zimmerman is arrogant because he was railroaded by politicians and Race Biters into a trial that left him with two million dollars of debt. For some reason that escapes me, the Herald Editorial Board finds the lawsuit ironic, maybe because the law protects victims of criminals who used deadly force in self-defense from the family of the feloniously departed to make some dough. But you must ignore the merits of the case, merits that allowed Zimmerman to escape the legal lynching by a jury finding him not guilty: please ignore all that says the Herald because in their opinion Zimmerman is scum.

The Martin’s family attorney, Benjamin Crump, called the suit “unfounded” and “another failed attempt to defend the indefensible and a shameless attempt to profit off the lives and grief of others.” That sounds about right.

Whys shouldn’t he profit? Lord knows his parents have been extracting every penny they can out of Trayvon’s faux story created to sell books, hoodies and pity party donations. Hell, mom is launching a political career riding on the bones of her son.