It’s been just under two days since the bombing in Manchester, UK.
I’m starting to see the usual “the bomber was not a Muslim” OpEds that follow a radical Islam attack.
I’m getting a little tired of the same people who tell me that all a biological man has to do to become a woman is identify as one; but a man from a religious Muslim family, who regularly attended Mosque, whose brother is a teacher at sn Islamic school, who traveled to the Middle East to train with al Qaeda, isn’t really a Muslim.
“I’m starting to see the usual ‘the bomber was not a Muslim’ OpEds that follow a radical Islam attack.”
Of course. It goes with the progtard narrative.
But the icing on the cake of the latest progtard stupidity has to be this:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05/cosmopolitan-magazine-uses-manchester-tragedy-push-pro-muslum-narrative/
Cosmopolitan magazine, much like the other progtard rags like Rolling Stone and the rest, need be put to pasture already.
It’s to the point they deny Mohammed was a Muslim.
To the Left, “Muslim” is a political construct, not an objective one. If the subject does something that interferes with the Narrative he’s ‘not a muslim’ by default.
Same thing with “black” or “gay”- just ask Tammy Bruce or Clarence Thomas.
“Words mean what I want them to mean, no more and no less”–Lewis Carroll, Alice Through The Looking Glass