Big ooopsie.
My guess (and I will let AWA properly analyze it) is that we know have a 9-0 consensus.
PS: He did already Cargill v. Garland, what does it mean? – Gun Free Zone
By Miguel.GFZ
Semi-retired like Vito Corleone before the heart attack. Consiglieri to J.Kb and AWA. I lived in a Gun Control Paradise: It sucked and got people killed. I do believe that Freedom scares the political elites.
not to further muddy the waters, every photo I saw of the “alleged” rifles used in that #1 looked staged and #2 none of the rifles had a bump stock.. none.. oh well, We the People won one..
Unlike majority opinions and similar to concurring opinions, dissenting opinions are not binding law and, therefore, future cases are not obliged to follow them. This does nothing, and Sotomayor is free to ignore her own comments from this dissent in the future.
Trump is not a friend of the Second Amendment no matter what he may say. It’s just that he’s LESS of a threat to it than 99% of the demonrats.