As a former federal agent, I carried a gun and two extra magazines every day — marked “for law enforcement use only.”

My mags held more than 10 rounds — the limit under federal law at the time.

That provision was part of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban, which expired in 2004. 1/

— Rep. Abigail Spanberger (@RepSpanberger) July 7, 2023

Because weapons of war do not belong on our streets.

A restored Assault Weapons Ban is an overdue, commonsense step to save American lives. 3/

— Rep. Abigail Spanberger (@RepSpanberger) July 7, 2023

She was a Postal Inspector who then became a CIA Officer.

Her statement was then backed up by a Marine Officer turned Congressman.

I carried guns in Iraq, and I know how to use them. I’ve also seen what they can do to a person.@RepSpanberger is 100% right — large magazines and assault weapons need to be banned from our streets.@SpeakerMcCarthy should put Democrats’ gun safety legislation up for a vote. https://t.co/c7KnUibfl5

— Rep. Seth Moulton (@RepMoulton) July 8, 2023

These people love the idea of government agents outgunning civilians.

There is no evidence at all that magazine capacity bans have any effect on crime.

Even the idea that: “the bad guy can get bum-rushed when he reloads” us fallacious.

These people simply enjoy having privileges that ordinary citizens don’t have.

It’s no surprise that the people who exempted themselves from insider trading so they can make millions on a government salary like having guns and magazines that you cannot.