Month: May 2018

Democrats are why I won guns

Democrats love Frankin Delano Roosevelt.  Liberals rank him the No. President after Abraham Lincoln, the Washington Post puts him at No. 4.  Obama was praised as being the next FDR or the most successful president since FDR.  He is a benchmark for Democrats.

I have talked about the MS St. Louis before.  It was a ship full of Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany that tired to dock in the US.  The administration of FDR denied them refugee status, using the excuse that there may be German spies on the boat.   The St. Louis was sent back to Germany and the people on it were killed in the Holocaust.

That turned out to be the tip of the iceberg of FDR’s Jew hatred.

Last night I read something about FDR that I had never heard before.  A story absolutely buried by the American media.

Allow me to introduce you to M Project.

FDR WANTED JEWS ‘SPREAD THIN’ AND KEPT OUT OF U.S., DOCUMENTS REVEAL.

New evidence suggests that as the Jews of Europe were being slaughtered across continent during the Holocaust, President Franklin D. Roosevelt did not want them seeking refuge on American shores.

Tucked away in a secret vault inside the White House during his 12 year tenure as commander-in-chief, the newly revealed documents recently made public via the FDR Library paint a portrait of the President’s plan to ‘spread thin all over the world’ the remains of European Jewry.

Among the files in Roosevelt’s safe was evidence of a secret initiative dubbed the “M Project,” a study he commissioned that outlined options for post-war migration of the millions of Europeans, especially Jews, expected to be displaced by the war, according to Tablet Magazine.

The project was first proposed in the summer of 1942, with Roosevelt enlisting the assistance of former diplomat and writer John Franklin Carter, who ran an informal secret intelligence service for the President, along with Carter’s colleague Henry Field.

“I know that you and Henry Field can carry out this project unofficially, exploratorially, ethnologically, racially, admixturally, miscegenationally, confidentially and, above all, budgetarily,” FDR wrote to Carter in a secret memo authorizing the plan in July 1942.

FDR knew about the Holocaust and knew that the displaced Jews of Europe would want refuge and decided to create a secret project that would prevent them from resetting to America.  To this end, he hired vicious Antisemites to help realize his goal of banishing the world’s Jews to the far, uninhabited corners of the Earth.

Roosevelt “also pointed out… that while most South American countries would be glad to admit Jewish immigration, it was on the condition that the Jewish group were not localized in the cities, they want no ‘Jewish colonies,’ ‘Italian colonies,’ etc.”

Keeping with this theme, the president also tasked the committee with determining how to “resettle the Jews on the land and keep them there.”

Hrdlička ultimately refused to participate in the President’s plan after the White House made clear he would not have absolute control of the project.

The next choice was Isaiah Bowman, president of Johns Hopkins University, geographer and outspoken anti-semite. Upon becoming head of the university during the second World War, Bowman fired a number of prominent professors, believing that“There are already too many Jews at Hopkins.”

He was also quoted as saying “Jews don’t come to Hopkins to make the world better or anything like that. They came for two things: to make money and to marry non-Jewish women.”

He later instituted a quota limiting the number of Jewish students allowed into the school and restricted the number of Jewish students allowed to pursue degrees in the fields of science and math

Experts say Roosevelt was well-aware of Bowman’s prejudices, having started a correspondence with him years earlier. In 1938, Roosevelt asked Bowman undertake a study examining how Jewish Europeans resettling in South America would acclimate to the environment.

“Frankly, what I am rather looking for is the possibility of uninhabited or sparsely inhabited good agricultural lands to which Jewish colonies might be sent,” the President wrote to Bowman. He added that “such colonies need not be large but, in all probability, should be large enough for mutual cooperation and assistance—say fifty to one hundred thousand people in a given area.”

As it turns out, it wasn’t just Hitler that wanted a solution to the Jewish question.  FDR wanted one too.  Literally.

Describing the M Project to UK Prime Minister Winston Churchill in 1943, Roosevelt said the study is focused on “the problem of working out the best way to settle the Jewish question,” adding that the solution “essentially is to spread the Jews thin all over the world,” rather than allow them amass in large numbers in one specific place. The conversation was recorded in the diary of Vice President Henry Wallace, who was present at the meeting.

One more time, from the mouth of US President Franklin Delano Roosevelt:

“the problem of working out the best way to settle the Jewish question

What stopped this from going forward?  Was it that FDR came down with a sudden case of decency?  Nope, he went to hell.

The M Project would finally be scrapped by President Harry Truman, who took over as commander-in-chief after Roosevelt died on April 12, 1945. Truman saw the study as a colossal waste of money, which was granted $10,000 a month, and ordered the State Department to pull the funding soon after becoming President. 

The documents released from The FDR library really make we wonder how much of FDR’s reluctance to fight in the European theater early on it the war was due to admiration of Hitler.  Turns out FDR was also a Jew hating eugenicist interested in blood purity.

Roosevelt didn’t address these issues publicly, but confidential files kept in his personal safe in the White House and released to the public decades after his death, as well as correspondence in his personal files, provide valuable clues. They make it clear that the question of where to settle the Jews had been on FDR’s mind for years. While he was uncertain about whether they would be better off on the slopes of the Andes or the savannahs of central Africa, there was one place he knew he didn’t want them: the United States of America…

The future president remarked that “no sensible American wants this country to be made a dumping ground for foreigners of any nation, but it is equally true that there are a great many foreigners who, if they came here, would make exceedingly desirable citizens. It becomes, therefore, in the first place, a question of selection.” Roosevelt informed his readers that “a little new European blood of the right sort does a lot of good in every community.”

While the column doesn’t define “the right sort,” it provides two examples of good emigrants, those from Southern Germany and Northern Italy. Roosevelt also expressed the opinion that “for a good many years to come European immigration should remain greatly restricted,” and that “foreigners” who had congregated in large American cities should be encouraged to disperse into the heartland. Roosevelt apparently held onto these opinions when he moved into the White House.

Apparently one of the beliefs he felt was that the Japanese could be dealt with via “interbreeding.”

A prominent public intellectual who had dominated American physical anthropology for decades, Hrdlička was convinced of the superiority of the white race and obsessed with racial identity. Shortly after the Pearl Harbor attack he’d written to Roosevelt expressing the view that the “less developed skulls” of Japanese were proof that they were innately warlike and had a lower level of evolutionary development than other races. The president wrote back asking whether the “Japanese problem” could be solved through mass interbreeding.

This really makes you wonder what the ultimate goal of Japanese interment was in the United States.  First round up all the Japanese Americans, then…?

I guess the Japanese Americans should start celebrating the death of FDR.

Remember that early on, Hitler wanted to relocate the Jews of Germany to Madagascar.

“The approaching victory gives Germany the possibility, and in my view also the duty, of solving the Jewish question in Europe. The desirable solution is: all Jews out of Europe.” That was how Franz Rademacher, head of the German Foreign Office’s “Jewish desk,” began a memo to the Nazi high command in the summer of 1940. In the document that followed, he spelled out an audacious plan to banish millions of European Jews to the African island of Madagascar. The scheme called for the Jews to have their European citizenship revoked and their property and personal fortunes seized to help fund a new “super-ghetto” in the Indian Ocean. Once resettled, they would languish under the rule of a Nazi SS police force. Rademacher argued that the island reservation could be spun as propaganda to show the world the “generosity” of the German people.

The plan was abandoned because of WWII it it being just to difficult and costly to relocate the Jews.  Extermination was quicker, cheaper, and easier.

As these documents from the FDR Library show, FDR pretty much had the same idea as early Hitler.  Just round up all the Jews and stick them somewhere in Africa, far away from the the people with “the right blood.”

Between Japanese interment and the M Project, the difference between 1942 FDR and 1938 Hitler was the width of a mustache.

If it were not for a well timed blood clot and the moral character of Harry Truman god knows what would have happened to the Jews and Japanese of America.

For all the Democrats who say that the US elected a Hitler like tyrant as President, they are right.  We did it in 1932, 1936, 1940, and 1944; and the Democrats loved him for it.

THIS IS WHY I OWN GUNS.

A little consideration counts.

If you are going to start tossing construction debris in the back of your pick up truck at Oh-Way-Way-Past midnight in a quiet neighborhood, do not bitch when you are suddenly lit with several hundred lumens of light by yours truly who is trying to figure out WTF is that noise so close to my house.

 

Police Body Cams: The worst thing it could happen to the Politics of Entitlement.

I want to double down on what Miguel wrote.

I saw this yesterday.  The son of the Mayor of Denver cursing out a City of Aurora police officer during a traffic stop.

The entitlement in that adult child is off the charts.  The two questions are how much other criminality did Junior get away with because “do you know who my dad is” in Denver.  How will this affect Dad’s political career?

Some pigs are more equal than others until the news gets hold of the body cam footage.

 

Police Body Cams: The worst thing it could happen to the Politics of Racism.

When they police departments across the nation went t equip their officers with body cameras, I felt it was going to be a savior for many cops and a stake in the heart to the Black Lives Matter movement. And it has.

One Dawn Hilton-Williams went on Facebook Live to rant on how she had been abused by a racist white cop during a traffic stop. She went so thick with her comments that she ran an overdraft of her Race Card.

Here is her video.

 

And then we have what happened, courtesy of the deputy’s body camera:

We now have a group of people who will have no shame in creating false racial narratives to make themselves famous. They do so with total disregard of what can happen down the road and sometimes hoping that something will happen.  I don’t know why. Maybe they want their share of the celebrity status pie and hopefully some cash along with it, I don’t know. But I do know their antics are going to get somebody killed and they are going to claim innocence a bit too late.

The Left destroys both good neighbors and home security

This Tweet is from The Washington Post.

The article:

A woman called 911 about burglars at her neighbor’s house. They were black Airbnb guests.

They checked out of their Airbnb rental. They loaded their suitcases into the car. Then they found themselves surrounded by police.

Oh no!  Quick, let’s blow this molehill into a mountain of oppression.

Moments before, a neighbor had watched the three black women carry their luggage out of the Rialto, Calif., house. She didn’t recognize the guests as homeowners, so she called the police about a possible residential burglary in progress, police said. Police responded as they typically would to a report of an in-progress burglary, sending six police officers and a helicopter to the scene with the goal of surrounding the house’s perimeter, making it difficult for the criminals to escape, Rialto Police Lt. Dean Hardin told The Washington Post.

A person sees people she didn’t recognize carrying bags of stuff out of a neighbor’s home, gets suspicions, and calls the police.

Sounds like a good neighbor to me.  Wait, it is 2018.  We can’t good neighbors that watch our for each other anymore.  That is what good communities do.  Progressives have to destroy that Leave it to Beaver shit.

The April 30 incident is the latest example of law enforcement summoned by a business or individual to deal with minorities who had simply been going about their day.

RACISM!!!  It has to be racism.  Now we have to hear “Airbnbing while black.”  Will Airbnb have to have people go to bias training?  What are we going to do.

OR…

A woman sees people she didn’t recognize carrying bags of stuff out of a neighbor’s home, gets suspicions, and calls the police is being a good neighbor watching out for the safety of other people in her neighborhood.

Last month, two black men were arrested for trespassing in Philadelphia after a Starbucks employee called police because they hadn’t purchased anything. 

WaPo is going to bring that shit up?  I guess loitering in a private business is perfectly acceptable for black people to do in the name of social justice.

A video of the Rialto incident went viral this week. On Monday, police said in a news release that they were served with notice of a lawsuit on behalf of the guests: Donisha Prendergast, a filmmaker and a granddaughter of Bob Marley; Kelly Fyffe-Marshall, also a filmmaker; and Komi-Oluwa Olafimihan, an artist. The group was visiting Rialto for an event.

Bring on the lawsuits.  I can’t see how this isn’t a waste of money all around.

The Airbnb guests and police tell different stories of what occurred after police arrived at the house on West Loma Vista Drive around 12:36 a.m. But both recorded the encounter. The guests captured it on their phones and subsequently posted the videos to social media. Police say officers wore body cameras, which provided footage that was “accurate and unedited,” and say the department is confident that the officers involved treated the guests with “dignity, respect and professionalism,” according to the news release.

I want to see the video.  I have heard nothing indicating that the women were physically abused.

But Prendergast wrote on Instagram that she and the guests “got surrounded by the police for being black in a white neighborhood.”

Or maybe it was not being recognized by the neighbor while carrying bags out of a house.  That detail isn’t important.  Only race is important.

“I’m sad and irritated to see that fear is still the first place police officers go in their pursuit to serve and protect, to the point that protocol supersedes their ability to have discernment,” she wrote.

It’s called controlling the situation.  It can be abusive sometimes.  Sometimes suspects give a lot of lip.  That’s why I want to see the tape.

Olafimihan wrote on Instagram that “over 700 people that look just like me did not walk away alive from a situation like this last year.”

That isn’t a relevant point, she walked away alive.

Fyffe-Marshall wrote on Instagram that when police arrived, they demanded the guests put their hands in the air and informed them that a helicopter was tracking them.

Sounds like standard police procedure.

“They locked down the neighborhood and had us standing in the street. Why? A neighbour across the street saw 3 black people packing luggage into their car and assumed we were stealing from the house,” she wrote.

Three strangers packing luggage into their car.  People the neighbor did not recognize.  That is the operative part of all of this.  Or are we going to assume that if the neighbor saw three white guys she didn’t recognize carrying stuff out of the house she’d offer to help them?

Fyffe-Marshall wrote that about 20 minutes into the encounter, the misunderstanding escalated “almost instantly.”

“Their Sergeant arrived,” she wrote. “He explained they didn’t know what Airbnb was. He insisted that we were lying about it and said we had to prove it. We showed them the booking confirmations and phoned the landlord.”

  Evidence.  The police wanted evidence.  How terrible that they didn’t take robbery suspects at their word.

“Because they didn’t know what she looked like on the other end to confirm it was her… they detained us,” Fyffe-Marshall wrote, adding that officers investigated the incident as a possible felony for 45 minutes. She added that the neighbor had called the police because the guests had failed to wave at her while loading their luggage into the car.

And they proved they were who they said they were and that they had the right to be there and they were let go.  I can see 45 minutes being a long time but when was the last time you got pulled over.  A speeding ticket takes 30 minutes now days to run a person’s drivers license.

Hardin, the police lieutenant, said that once officers arrived to the house, they “recognized quickly” that there was no burglary in progress. He said officers canceled their request for a helicopter, and spent a total of 22 minutes verifying that the guests were staying at the rental lawfully. 

What did I just say?  The police verified the women’s story and let them go.

“After that, we sent them on their way,” he said. “We felt our officers acted professionally. We thought it was a good outcome for everyone involved. We didn’t detain anyone in handcuffs… we didn’t restrict their movement, they were allowed to walk around. We detained them just enough to figure out if they were lawfully in that house. No force was used.”

Good job.  Sounds like that was handled about as well as those kinds of things can be handled.

Hardin confirmed that the guests were asked to show officers their hands in case they were carrying weapons, and confirmed that one of the officers didn’t know what Airbnb was but was “quickly educated by the officers.” He added that officers learned the residence was an unlicensed Airbnb rental.

Standard police procedure.  Also the “unlicensed Airbnb” part makes me hate Airbnb more than I already do.  

But Rialto police don’t believe the April 30 encounter had anything to do with race.

Sounds like it.

“Unfortunately, when we receive a phone call for something of this type of significance — a burglary in progress — we have to respond,” Hardin said. “As far as the racial aspect, I don’t believe that’s even a factor in this call. We’re responding to what we’re being told. And we will be neglect if we didn’t respond.”

Holy shit!  Cops taking their job to stop a crime in progress seriously.  Broward County take note.

The owner of the Rialto home where the guests stayed, Marie Rodriguez, told the Mercury News she was shocked at how the encounter has been portrayed online.

“They’re making it sound like it’s racially motivated, and it has nothing to do with that,” she said. “It’s all over social media.”

Social justice progressives take a perfectly reasonable, if not slightly unfortunate, story and have to season it to death with racism, identity politics, and oppression.

Had the homeowner simply said to her neighbor “I put my place up on Airbnb, some guests will be staying at my house for a few days.”  The whole thing would have never happened.  A tiny bit of common sense and courtesy and this shit could have been avoided.

Once again the lesson is: Just buy the fucking cup of coffee before asking to take a piss.

Airbnb in the past has faced problems with discrimination, but those concerns typically involved the people renting out their properties. The company in 2016 released a 32-page report on its plans to crack down on discrimination and has worked to service more minority communities.

Airbnb is a San Francisco based tech company.  Leftists for some reason have decided to sink their own companies with social justice.  If Airbnb wants to offend its users and send its revenue down the toilet next to Starbucks, I’m glad I’m not an investor.

“The fact that this neighbor was not a member of the Airbnb community doesn’t change the fact that what happened to our Guests is unconscionable and a reminder of how far we still have to go as a society,” Airbnb spokesman Nick Papas said in a statement to The Post Monday.

“Yeah, fuck that woman just looking our for her neighbor not knowing it was an Airbnb rental.  She’s a racist and this is just another example that America is racist as a whole.”

He said the company has reached out to the guests to express its sympathy and support.

“While we do fundamentally believe in the power of travel to break down historic barriers and have faith in our fellow humans, we will continue to do all we can to make sure our Guests feel like they belong when they travel to different communities around the world,” Papas wrote.

Just fucking tell your neighbor that you put your place up on Airbnb.

Fyffe-Marshall in her post about the incident called it traumatic.

Now she has PTSD along with her Post Traumatic Slave Syndrome.  Having the cops called on her and hold her for 22 minutes is like having your arms blown off in Iraq.  I bet she is going to have to go on disability now.  Somebody better set up a GoFundMe so she’ll be able to continue to afford her luxury lifestyle.

“We have been dealing with different emotions and you want to laugh about this but it’s not funny,” she wrote. “I’ve been angry, frustrated and sad. I was later detained at the airport. This is insanity.”

The TSA is in on this god damned conspiracy to oppress these poor women.  This is systematic racism of the highest order.  Never mind that EVERYONE hates the TSA and airport security.  A black woman was detained so the world has to stop rotating on its axis until we get to the bottom of this.

If you think I’m being hyperbolic, I’m not.

https://twitter.com/Marina_Sirtis/status/994201411238817793

See, if Hillary was POTUS, that would would have seen three strange women coming out of her neighbor’s house carrying bags and not called the police because…?

Yeah… it makes no sense to me either.  Then again I’m not a social justice warrior who believes in a Grand Unification Theory of Bigotry where everything in the world is connected trough racism.

If a butterfly flaps its wings in China a cop shoots a black man.

Personally, I hate Airbnb.  I’ve never used it, I won’t use it, I most certainly won’t put my home on it.  Same with Uber and Lyft.  Sorry, but I don’t trust other people.  “Oooo, a stranger downloaded an app and now I’m going to let them into my home or car, I see absolutely no liability in that whatsoever.”  Nope, I value my privacy and security and the want no part of the “sharing economy.”  This case only drives that point home with me.

Ultimately, the danger here is that when stories like this grow legs and travel around the internet destroying reputations it puts a chilling effect on people.

Communities are safe when people in that community work to keep it safe.  When neighbors look out for neighbors that is a sign that a neighborhood is going to be safe, people will want to live there, and the homes will keep their property values.

Put the chill on that and the community will suffer.

“Should I call the police because I see two men carrying a TV out of my neighbor’s house?  I don’t want to get a million death threats on Facebook because of it.  I’ll just keep quiet and hope my neighbor has insurance.”

That is the future.

Kitty Genovese Syndrome is also known as the bystander effect.  When a bunch of people witness a crime but don’t help because each one is sure somebody else will help.

This will blow Kitty Genovese Syndrome out of the water.  A bunch of people will witness a crime but no one will help because they are all afraid of being called “racist” for it.

There is not one good and positive thing in society that these activists will not try and destroy.

You can’t be a good neighbor anymore.  That is racist.

The Dems just love criminals

Philippe Reines was an advisory to Hillary Clinton when she was Secretary of State.  He sent out a vile Tweet in regards to a Page Six story about Donald Trump Jr.’s wife.

This shows more about Reines and the Democrats than anything else.

The Latin Kings are a notoriously violent street gang that has made its mark by selling drugs and murdering people.

Reines fetishizies them.  Fetishizing criminals is a longstanding tradition in among the Left.  Che was a racist, violent, murder; but one picture and he became a cultural icon.

This is why the Dems have become anti-cop.  They love criminals more than decent, law abiding people.

Forget decency, if you want the Dems to love you, go out and break the law.  It worked for Clinton, Menendez, and about half the Illinois’ and New York’s state goverment.

If have one bit of advice for Don Jr.  Take Reines up on his belief.  If Reines loves the machismo of a violent criminal, break every bone in his body with a crowbar.  I’m sure when you are done making him eat is words along with his teeth and maybe his balls too (I’m not kidding, MS-13 does that and you see how much the Dems bend over backwards not to condemn them) your dad will pardon you.  I know I would.

Tell me again how law abiding gun owners are at fault

A friend of mine showed me something interesting.  A commemorative coffee cup from DPMS.

The text on it says “May 2012 Record Amount Shipped in 30 Days 13,794 Units.”

Think about that.  In May of 2012, DMPS made and sold 13,794 AR-15 pattern rifles.

That was this month, six years ago.  That was a record month, so how many were made in the months before and after?  How many have been made since then?

If you assume a mass shooting is four or more people, than just those numbers alone would be 55,176 victims.  That’s 20,000 more people than all the firearms related deaths in 2016, including suicides.  For one month of sales.  For one manufacturer (and not even the largest).

If the problem were really law abiding gun owners with their legally purchased AR-15’s, there would be nobody left alive.

Also, for the gun grabbers, how do you expect to confiscate ARs from 13,794 people.  Keep in mind that is just one month of sales for one manufacturer.  Just imagine what the total number is.