Month: May 2018

The Parkland lawsuit against S&W

I saw Miguel’s post on the lawsuit being brought against American Outdoor Brands and the gun store that sold Cruz his rifle.

New, we know that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act is going to shield AOB from any liability.

That said, I hope to God a liberal judge doesn’t dismiss this before it begins because of the PLCCA.  Why?

One word: Discovery.

The plaintiffs are saying this was foreseeable.

Fred and Jennifer Guttenberg, and Max Schachter “seek to hold defendants legally responsible for their complicity in the entirely foreseeable, deadly use of the assault-style weapons that they place on the market,” according to the lawsuit, filed in Broward Circuit Court.

That is how they are trying to get around the PLCCA.  But Cruz was not a prohibited person and (presumably) passed a Form 4473 NICS check.  So how was the retailer and AOB supposed to foresee this shooting?

Logic dictates that the plaintiffs will present all the evidence of red flags the Cruz sent up.

The defense will show how those red flags were not noticed by the retailer or AOB because Cruz was not a prohibited person and nothing appeared on his background check.

The Broward County School District and Sheriffs Department will be caught in the middle.  All the evidence that the plaintiffs will need to bring to prove their side of the case is incriminatory against Broward County schools and sheriff.

In giving the plaintiffs rope to hang AOB, they will be putting nooses around the necks of school board and Sheriff Israel.

I will be fantastic to watch.  I just hope the plaintiffs’ attorney doesn’t realize what he is doing and shuts this down before all the dirt on Sheriff Israel and the school board comes out in a court of law.

Weird Glock Malfunction.

A West Carrollton police officer’s accidental shooting of himself at a Franklin firing range is being attributed to his gun malfunctioning, authorities said.
The May 4 firing range accident occurred after a safety feature on the officer’s Glock failed, said West Carrollton Deputy Police Chief David Wessling.
“There’s a pin in the triggers of Glocks that keeps the safety in place, and the pin had actually worked itself out to the side of the gun to the point that it was sticking out far enough that when he stuck (the gun) in the holster, the pin caught the edge of the holster and pulled the trigger back,” Wessling said.
“That’s nothing that you would ever expect to happen,” he said.
The officer was wounded in the calf area and in the foot on his right side, Wessling said

Glock glitch: Local police officer’s accidental shooting blamed on gun

First time I heard of something like this. Not being a Glock Fanboi, I should probably be nodding at the possibility, but I know there is the distinct possibility of somebody screwing around with the trigger group because they read something in the internet.

If anybody has heard about a similar experience, let us know in the comments.

Hat Tip @greenmeanie01

Outlook for the 2018 Hurricane Season (A.K.A. we are guessing)

10 to 16 Named Storms: That is over a plus/minus 50 % margin of error.

5 to 9 hurricanes, over 90% margin of error.

1 to 4 major hurricanes comes to 300% margin of error.

It is just a guessing game. The only thing for sure is that one storm will happen.

What we know is that chances for hurricanes become more prominent staring in June and die come November. How many is a guess and you only need to be prepared for the one that hits land. Praying that does not happen cost you nothing.

Parkland Victims’ parents to sue Gun Maker and Gun Store.

The families of two high school students who died in the tragic Parkland shooting earlier this year are pushing to sue the maker of the gun used in the massacre, accusing manufacturers of being in a “protected class.”

Florida school shooting victims’ parents move to sue gun maker, seller of firearm used in Parkland massacre.

I was going to rant once again on the stupidity that lawyers seem to keep repeating by convincing parents that they will go far with these lawsuits only to leave the hanging with the bills when they lose.

But I caught the name if the lawyer representing the parents: Julie Braman Kane. A quick check in the internet reveals she is a Personal Injury Lawyer located in Coral Gables (where all the Law Firms seem to congregate in Miami.  No Mos Eisley jokes, please) and working with a very successful firm, but also she was till last year the president of the American Association of Justice, formerly the Association of Trial Lawyers of America or in plain English the lawyers that unkind people would refer to as “ambulance chasers.” They are a lobby group opposed to tort reform and according to the WaPo a trial lawyers group that serves as one of the Democratic Party’s most influential political allies

Having a penthouse in Alhambra Circle in Coral Gables is not a small monetary feat, having the name of the firm displayed in the building does not come cheap. These are heavy political and financial hitters that will not charge cheap and they are not going after McDonalds of Big Tobacco and they know it so…

Who is paying the bill?

 

My take on the Esquire idea of compromise

I saw Miguel’s post Another Annoying Gun Control Compromise Piece and read the article, and thought I’d take a whack at it’s idiocy.

It turns out that the article Miguel was criticizing was a followup to a first piece.  I figure that the best way to do this justice is to start from the beginning of the first article.  Usually when I do a takedown like this I will go through a whole article.  Since I’m trying to kill two birds with one post, I will truncate to the critical point.

So, from the beginning.

Okay, Now I Actually Do Want To Take Your Guns

Hey there, NRA:

Listen, I know the moments after a gunman opens fire in a school are hectic for you. You have to get your talking points together, you have to mentally prepare to debate a traumatized yet sensible child, you have to look at yourself in the mirror and practice saying that more guns would have made the situation less deadly. It’s a busy time! And since we are always either in the moments after or the moments before a mass shooting, you’re pretty much always busy, I have noticed!

No asshole.  It’s because we get attacked and blamed by you fuckers before the bodies are even cold.  CNN didn’t have one fact about the Parkland shooting right but organized a two hour anti-NRA hate fest live on TV before all the dead were in the ground.

Anyway, I just wanted to drop you a line and let you know that I now actually do want to take your guns.

All of your guns.

Right now.

At least you admit you want the impossible.  Now kindly fuck off.

It wasn’t always this way. I have responsible gun owners in my family. I’ve never been a fan of shooting at things myself, but guns sure do seem to have brought joy into the lives of some people I love, and as long as they were stored properly, I never had a problem with them being around. I believed that we should place a hurdle or two between a psychopath and an AR-15, but that’s about as ardent as I got. Live and let live, that was my policy. Even with death machines.

That has all changed. And you changed it.

So now you hate and distrust your own family members?  All the red flags are missed by Broward County and the FBI and Nikolas Cruz kills 17 kids and you are going to take out your anger on a brother, or parent, or cousin you have known all your life?  Jesus, you are unhinged.

All along, as American life has gotten deadlier, as our kids have gotten less safe in their schools, you have had the opportunity to work with the vast majority of Americans who support the sensible reform of our gun laws. You have had the chance to preserve your own rights as we work together to keep our gun regulations in step with gun technology. You haven’t. 

Actually violent crime is down.  Since I know you Lefties only listen to your side, here’s an article from Vox explaining how murders are at a 33 year low.  What is at an all time high is self-righteous pricks on CNN doing 24/7 coverage of every shooting until you are saturated with it.

All along, there have been opportunities for sensible, incremental changes. This year alone, we could have banned the manufacture of bump stocks, which turn semi-automatic weapons into automatic ones. We could have raised the minimum age for gun ownership from 18 to 21, or instate a national minimum age for long-gun ownership. We haven’t, largely because you have bought our government. 

That pesky Constitution, always getting in the way of Progressives just trying to protect people by curtailing every single right.  How dare law abiding citizens get in the way of these people.

What you have done is double down. What you’ve done is convince your members that the occasional school shooting, the odd literal slaughter of innocents, is an unfortunate but inevitable quirk of American life, a thing that is necessary to preserve freedom. You have taken to our television screens to tell us that the world is an apocalyptic hellscape, and that the only way to be safe from gun violence is to stock our homes with guns.

No.  What we’ve said is that there are ways to stop this shit from happening that doesn’t involve turning good people into criminals over arbitrary regulations that would be ineffective at preventing crime.

Also, it is CNN that is screeching about America being an “apocalyptic hellscape” because of law abiding gun owners.

You pushed legislation that cut funding from the Centers for Disease Control for research on gun safety in America. Research that might conclude that fewer guns would mean fewer gun deaths, which leaves us with…no meaningful research on gun violence in America. Our ongoing studies on car safety have made cars, roads and highways safer—not without risk, but safer—yet no comparable studies can be done on guns.

We pushed legislation that prevented the CDC from being used as an anti gun propaganda generator.  When the CDC did study the issue and found that guns were more often than not used to deter crime, Obama buried that shit.

The young people of America are now expecting to witness gun violence in their schools. They are sitting in trigonometry waiting for the other shoe to drop, except the shoe can shoot 400 rounds a minute. That’s the result of all your hard work. There’s your prize. Stand up and take it!

The kids are expecting to witness problems because of 24/7 CNN coverage has warped their perception with bullshit.  Maybe if Liberals actually were interested in security measures instead of gun bans the Santa Fe school would have been better secured.  But since Marco Rubio doesn’t want to confiscate guns, you don’t want to support his school security initiative.

I was stunned and sad after Parkland. I was heartened by the efforts of the young people who watch their friends get murdered in front of them. I watched you make nice with them on CNN and then, behind their backs, call them terrorists.

The fuck world are you living in?  Not the one where David Hogg and the Parkland kids were calling us terrorists and saying we had blood on our hands and faces.

And then this morning I watched the same goddamn thing happen again, only this time at a high school in Santa Fe, Texas, where at least ten people are dead. As though all of the marching and organizing and common-sense talking had never happened. As though this ever growing pile of young bodies is worth nothing.

As long as what you are marching for is “lets curtail the rights of 150 million Americans who did nothing wrong” than your march is worth nothing.

So now I’m angry. Now I’m finished trying to reason with you. So now I, a guy who was ambivalent about guns just a few years ago, want to take your guns away. All of them. I want to take them all and melt them down and shape them into a giant sphere and then push it at you so you have to run away from it like Indiana Jones for the rest of your lives. I want Ted Nugent to roam the halls of his gunless house, sighing wearily until he dies. I want to end this thing once and for all, so that all of you who have prioritized the sale of guns over the lives of children have to sit quietly and think about what you’ve done. God help me, I want to take all of your guns out of your hands, by myself, right now.

So your message is “you broke no laws but you own guns so I hate you and want to take your property from you, then I want to hurt you and kill you.”  And you wonder why we double down on gun ownership?  This is why.  “Give up your guns so I can make you suffer” is a really convincing message.

It won’t happen, of course. So let’s meet in the middle. Let’s meet at…literally anything.

What is the middle?  You only want to kill half of us?  Maybe some light torture?

It’s happening. We tried it your way, and it really did not work. The ground is shifting. Get ready.

We are ready.  Fuck you.

So this douche at Esquire got angry and took to his computer to be an internet tough guy.  Every fuck thing he said was bereft of facts and was as accurate as CNN’s town hall on guns.  There was push-back.  So he responded in the only way he knew how.  He had to be the victim.

What Happens When You Write About Gun Control in America
Gun-rights activists threaten to shoot you (among other reactions).

I’m sorry fucker, but you did threaten to kill us first.  Or did you forget that Mr. Keyboard Bravado.

When you write a piece about America’s unique and uniquely deadly gun problem, as I have done many times for Esquire, you expect a few things to happen: gun-control people will applaud, gun-rights advocates will get upset, and your Twitter mentions will be a mess for a few days.

But when, in the face of another school shooting, you write an angry one about how you’ve finally had it and now you want to take all the guns away—even if that piece ends up being pretty moderate when you actually look at it—a whole new series of events will happen. In case you’re thinking about taking on such an endeavor, here are a few things to expect.

That pile of shit was moderate?  “I want to take the private property away from 150 Million people who did nothing wrong, then I want to make them suffer.”  By what standard is that moderate?

Gun people will skip the “reading” part and go directly to the “reacting.”

We read it.  We didn’t like it.  Don’t imply that we’re stupid because we disagree.

You cannot trust everyone to read past a punchy headline. That’s why plenty of people—plenty—ran right to their keyboards to say: “You’re taking my guns? You’ll get them bullets first.” I would also accept—and did, oh my God, so many times:

  • “Go ahead and try, the streets will be awash in blood.”
  • “Good luck confiscating all those guns yourself, really hope you don’t get murdered by law abiding citizens lol.”
  • “Molon Labe.” (I’d never heard this one before, and it appears to be the gun lobby’s version of “Bazinga.”)
  • Lots of memed-up screenshots from Tombstone and Deadwood, which, if you’re trying to convince me that 2018 America is not the Wild West, are less than encouraging.

Again, your argument was “I want to personally take away your guns and kill you, but that’s impossible, so I’m just going to fantasize about it on paper.”  Now you’re upset that we said “dare you, fucker.”

Also, how do you not know what Molon Labe means?  You really got the best use out of your liberal arts degree, didn’t you?  A real student of history and the classics.

This is not a problem that’s endemic to one side of one issue, by the way. Plenty of people of all political persuasions will get worked up over a headline and develop an opinion instead of reading the piece. But in my experience, only gun-rights activists will do this and then add that they’re going to shoot you.

YOU THREATENED TO KILL US FIRST!  Jesus!  “There was another school shooting now I have to murder NRA members” is something we see all the fucking time.

Had any of these folks bothered to read the piece, which was only 800 words and I am not James Joyce

You got that right.  Nobody will remember you in 80 years.

[T]hey would have seen the part where I said: “It won’t happen, of course. So let’s meet in the middle.”

“I only want to kill half of you and lightly torture the rest.”  Fuck you.

I am coming from a place of passion, but I am willing to compromise. Yes of course, in the churn of yet another school shooting, in the only country where this happens anywhere near as often as it does, I want to make the problem go away. In these all-too-common moments, my most special wish is to make all the guns disappear.

How magnanimous of you?  Just how many people are you going to disappear too?

There are a lot of impractical things I want and cannot have, so I must compromise. But compromise is not acquiescence. The other side has to give up something, too. I want a world without guns, but I will settle for a handgun being harder to purchase than a second box of Aleve Cold & Sinus. You may want unfettered access to the death machine of your choice, but you must admit it’s making America a dangerous place to live, and scarring an entire generation.

Not one word in that was factually accurate.  How can we compromise when everything you say is wrong?

Your hobby has a death toll, and you must work with us to bring it down. You’ll lose something you want. So will I. That’s life. And then when we’ve done that and I can devote my energy to the Pointer Sisters thing, trust me—the choreography will be simple and accessible to even the beginning performer.

My hobby killed no one.  Criminals killed people.  Don’t confuse the two.

Literally everything but guns will be blamed.

What the fuck?  The gun is a tool.  A sicko has evil in his soul.  The people tasked with protecting students fucked up.  You still blame the tool and the people who made it and the law abiding people who like them.

You are the one blaming everything and everybody but the people responsible.

Violent video games and movies are the real culprit, even though the rest of the world plays and watches them. Moral decay is at fault, even though that’s subjective and not unique to America. It’s the shooter who killed people, not the gun, as though he would have racked up the same body count with a sack of oranges.

The video game argument died fast because it’s bullshit.  Tipper Gore lost that shit back in the 90’s.

You want to talk about moral decay.  We can talk about a lot.  It seems to me like there is a correlation between the uptick in school shootings and kids being raised by single moms, a lack of attendance of church the destruction of the Boy Scouts or other institutions based on instructing young people in morality, and an attack on traditional male values such as character and responsibility as toxic.  Then there is the media sensationalism of shooters and the culture of celebrity at any cost.

You fuckers did that.

So to that end: let me point out that one hundred percent of mass shootings involve guns. Literally all of them. None of them don’t.

But not 100% of killings.  You just don’t care about those.

The one argument along these lines that I find halfway compelling is this one: mass shootings are a mental health issue. That’s not wrong, and the kernel of truth within it lies in the way it was expressed to me more times than I care to count: “It’s a mental health issue, faggot!”

We do expect our boys to keep their emotions close to the vest. We do teach our boys to be aggressive. We do tell them that vulnerability or sadness or loneliness or longing are things that must be hidden from view, otherwise they are women or homosexuals. We do say “Man up,” which has forever meant “don’t feel anything in public.”

Maybe if we eased up on that a little bit, maybe if these young men could express their emotions in healthy ways in safe environments, these stories might not end so tragically. Maybe if asking for help didn’t get boys mocked and diminished, they might do it more and reach for the all-too-available guns less. (Also, while we’re on the subject, if you think you’re insulting a gay man by calling him a gay man, you are a) not, and b) revealing so much about yourself you really would not believe it.)

Mostly though, I will concede that there is a mental health element to this problem for one simple reason: If you think the status quo is in any way defensible, you are out of your fucking mind.

Oh great, another person who confuses manliness with shitty pop culture.  It’s not “don’t express your emotions” it’s “do the responsible thing first.”  I’ve written about this before.  Read that.

The simple desire to make your country safer will be seen as a far-left viewpoint.

Fixed it for you: “The simple desire to make your country safer by collectively punishing the innocent is a far-left viewpoint.”

I wrote my piece to illustrate how a true moderate—in the face of a terrible and worsening problem—begins to think like an extremist. I have no desire to be an extremist. I think it’s a childish way to move through the world. 

No you admit you weren’t a moderate.  Good introspection.

I would love to meet in the middle. I would love for law-abiding gun owners to have access to the thing that brings them joy and gives them a sense of safety. I would also love for fewer children to get their heads shot off. So it really falls to the vast majority of gun owners who don’t belong to the NRA or support their agenda. To them I say: Where you at? We need you to get out here and start pushing. Otherwise it’ll just be the NRA on one side, and on the other, regular folks like me who actually do, with each new near-daily atrocity, become extremists and gun-grabbers.

You are a lying sack of shit.  You were honest when you said you wanted to take our guns and kill us.  Now you are all butthurt and back peddling because we stood up to you.

You want to protect kids.  Great.  Taking my guns won’t do fuck all to stop that.

The kids who are growing up under this dark cloud will be voting soon, and they are already actively not having it. So join us. I think the Pointer Sisters said it best: “Come on. Jump on in.”

And we’ll have to fight those tinpot dictators too.

You are not the victim here fucker.  You were an internet tough guy writing in an echo chamber that you didn’t expect us to read and challenge you on.

You hate guns, you hate gun owners, and you hate everyone who disagrees with you.

As soon as we told you just how deep and how rough you can shove your opinion up your ass (hint, very deep and very rough), you had to play the victim.

You are a typical Left Wing Progressive.

I didn’t kill anybody at Parkland, or anywhere else for that matter.  But because I own an AR you want to murder me and leave my children without a father.

My response to you is: fuck you, I dare you, come to my house and try it.

Why?  Because you want to  leave my children without a father because I have a different political opinion than you do.

There is no compromise on that position.  It is not moderate.

I want to be left alone.  I want to protect schools.  Those are not incompatible.

How about when a kid tosses out red flag we do something other than reward his bad behavior.  How about we put in place anti-bully measures that are effective.  How about we employ meaningful security procedures in schools.

Anything but “take the guns from the NRA’s cold dead hands.”

But you can’t do that.  It’s never the fault of your blessed government bureaucracy.  It has to be our fault as law abiding gun owners.

No it’s not.  You can take that attitude and fuck off with it.

And if you really do try and take my guns, you’ll get them bullets first you keyboard commando cocksucker.

 

NoRA targets BlackRock

Alyssa Milano and the celebrities of NoRA are now targeting the investment firm BlackRock for owning 17% of Ruger.

Previously I covered American Outdoor Brands’ kick-ass statement to BlackRock, when BlackRock got bit by the anti-gun bug.

Ruger also sent out a corporate statement to its shareholders explaining how BlackRock can go eat a dick.

The Company does not condone violence involving the criminal misuse of firearms. However, the intentional criminal misuse of lawfully manufactured, distributed and sold firearms is solely the responsibility of those who misuse them.  We do not support, and cannot support, stripping millions of law-abiding citizens of their Second Amendment right to own a firearm due to the evil actions of a small number of criminals.

This is how NoRA chose to spread their message to BlackRock.

Here is the text of that letter.

Today, BlackRock, a global funds management firm, holds its shareholder meeting in New York. BlackRock holds a 17% stake in Sturm, Ruger, the nation’s largest gun manufacturer.

Sturm, Ruger made the AR-556 assault weapon which killed 26 people in the Sutherland Springs church massacre and has among the most aggressive stances against gun violence prevention of any weapons company. It was recently bound by shareholder action to report on the violence committed with the guns it makes, to which Sturm, Ruger President and Board Member Chris Killoy replied “what the proposal does not and cannot do is to force us to change our business.”

Sturm, Ruger’s board includes Sandra Froman, a past president of the NRA and current NRA Board Member. Froman formerly worked to promote the views of William Shockley, a physicist who perpetuated theories that whites are genetically superior to other races.

BlackRock voted to confirm the entire board, made up of Froman, Killoy and seven other exclusively white men.

This blatant disregard for shareholder will and basic humanity is emblematic of the gun and financial industries’ combined efforts to value profit over lives.

Communities of color, especially women of color, suffer disproportionately from gun violence. The “leadership” of Sturm, Ruger and the NRA shows not only a disregard for this racist outcome, but in fact has actively promoted theories which perpetuate it.

Since 2015, Sturm, Ruger has paid the NRA at least $11 Million.

BlackRock and other financial institutions which own Sturm, Ruger are guilty of allowing this deadly racism and gross neglect to continue. If BlackRock wanted to show it valued lives over money – especially the lives of people of color – it would have done so last week and voted to replace the Sturm, Ruger board. It did not.

The American financial industry is killing Americans. We demand better.

The NoRA Coalition

This is a cluster-fuck of identity politics.

Of course the problem with BlackRock is that the board has too many white men on it, and having too many white men makes anything a Klan rally, regardless of what it is.

Of course their accusations of bigotry against Ms. Froman come from an article in Mother Jones, and are 47 years old when she was a secretary in Shockley’s office as an undergraduate at Stanford.

Of course to the human shit stains of NoRA, that black gang members killing each other is Ruger’s fault and not any other possible sociological or economic issues.

I could go on like this for a while, but I lived in Chicagoland when the news broke about Ruger guns and gang violence, and that Ruger was the most popular gun maker for Chicago’s criminals.

It turned out that gang members had figured out which rail cars were transporting firearms from Ruger’s New Hampshire factory cross country to distributors.  Then the gang would break into the railcar and steal the guns.  One night netted more than 104 guns.

Maybe NoRA should target BlackRock for its shares of Norfolk Southern and its racist practice of black Gangster Disciples breaking into its trains to steal guns.