Libs of TikTok has been an invaluable resource for videos and stories of groomer teachers.

The content produced has been noticed and the account boosted by Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson.

This has caused Libs of TikTok to catch the ire of the Left.

The Washington Post, a paper owned by the second wealthiest human on the planet, sent one of its most supine and diabolical shit rakers to destroy the person behind the account.

https://twitter.com/TaylorLorenz/status/1516399663305297920

This is how far they went.

https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1516403898952695813

The Washington Post article published the account holders name and at one point had an embedded hyperlink to her real estate license, her employer, their address, etc.

appears WaPo has since removed the hyperlink to the real estate license (pic one is the cached version; pic 2 is current online version).

but how the link to the license made it into the final draft that published is … curious. pic.twitter.com/ipOefW2pFp

— Becket Adams (@BecketAdams) April 19, 2022

The Washington Post also felt it was in the public interest to point out that the account holder is an Orthodox Jew.

On the one hand, you have a person with an anonymous Twitter account who reposts videos of radical Leftists outing themselves.

On the other, you have a reporter from one of the most influential media outlets in the country naming this person, posting links to her business license and employer, talking to her family members, and telling the Left that she’s a Right Wing Jew.

The same paper that helped bury the Hunter Biden laptop story and attacked the NY Post for publishing it.

Scratch a Leftist and find an antisemite.

This is intended to do more than intimate, this is intended to destroy the personal life of someone who stands against them, and they will pull out every stop, including Jew-hatred, to do that.

The true nature of the Left is being exposed.  It started with at-home schooling from the pandemic.  As more and more moderate normies see what is going on, the Left loses support.

The Left is scrambling to regain the narrative.

That’s why they are attacking Musk for wanting to restore free speech to Twitter.

That’s why they are trying to stop us from calling them “groomers.”

And that is why they are trying to destroy anonymous Right Wing accounts like Libs of TikTok.

It is open war on anyone who exposes the truth behind the narrative.

From Bloomberg News:

Amazon to Undergo Racial Audit, Led by Former AG Loretta Lynch

Amazon.com Inc. said it agreed to undergo an independent racial equity audit, joining companies including Citigroup Inc. and Tyson Foods Inc. in performing such reviews.

The audit — an analysis of companies to see whether their businesses cause and perpetuate discrimination — will be led by former U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, a partner at law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Amazon said in a proxy statement filed Thursday.

The review will measure any disparate racial impacts on Amazon’s U.S. hourly employees resulting from policies, programs and practices, the world’s largest online retailer said. The Seattle-based company said it will publish the audit’s results once completed.

New York State Common Retirement Fund filed a shareholder resolution with Amazon in 2021, asking for a racial audit. The request cited alleged discrimination of the company’s Black and Latinx workers, their low wages and exposure to dangerous working conditions, including Covid-19, as well as air pollution from distribution facilities located in minority neighborhoods.

There could be a myriad reasons that there isn’t perfect racial parity all levels of Amazon or any corporation other than straight racist discrimination.

We know, for instance, that people of different races and cultures select different majors.  White and Asian students make up higher percentages in finance and STEM.  Black l students tend to gravitate towards lower earning majors such as education, social work, and public affairs.

So if you were to audit a tech company or a bank, what do you think the upper ranks would look like given racial representation in college majors and applicant pools?

But the baseline assumption is that any difference is the result of bigotry and nothing else.

The auditors will come up with whatever conclusion they want, because the point here is to shakedown corporations.

Put the people we want in the positions we want or we will declare your company bigoted and destroy your reputation.

It’s the Soviet system using race.

All this will do is deepen racial divisions in society.   But I assume that’s also the point.

The Idiotsphere is having kitties of different shapes and sizes about U.S. District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle kiboshing the plane mask mandate.  Two things struck me as interesting about the reaction: First, they attacked the judge because a group of other lawyers found her not to be qualified for “reasons” (IMHO mostly because she was a Trump appointee), but not a peep has been said about the lack of legality, fault or if her decision was unconstitutional. Zip. Nada. Niente.

And the second thing? This.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki called it a “disappointing” decision and said the CDC was still reviewing the ruling while encouraging Americans to continue wearing masks while traveling. When pressed on whether travelers were currently required to wear masks, Psaki said they were waiting for guidance from the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security.

Federal judge strikes down mask mandate for planes (yahoo.com)

This is not a surprise the befell the administration out of nowhere. This is not a lawsuit that was brought last week, and the judge rushed to decide on it.

The suit was filed last July against President Biden, the CDC and various administration officials by a legal group known as Health Freedom Defense Fund and airline passengers, including Ana Daza, who said she has anxiety aggravated by wearing masks.

So, either the administration’s lawyers were a bunch of morons who did not prepare for an immediate appeal in case the decision went against them, or they clearly knew they did not have a legal stand at the end of the day and was better not to even bother. And when the administration officially says “we are reviewing the ruling” it probably means “we are going to put this crap in the back burner and hope you forget about it. Here, look at the squirrels!”

The people in the administration are probably happy they did not have to take down the ruling themselves. It is bad enough in the polls (and their pride) as it is than adding to admit they made a a huge legal mistake.

After the ruling (U.S. will no longer enforce mask mandate on airplanes, trains after court ruling | Reuters), we get the obligatory has-been celebrity making a stupid comment.

Apparently, it is hard for Rosanna to understand that she still has the personal freedom to fly with the mask is she chooses to do so.  And she is joined in the lamentations by some equally dumb people.

The politically hypochondriac have lost their ever-loving minds. You can always wear masks and saran-warp over your face if you choose so, but nobody is mandating French kissing a blood-splitting stranger in the plane either. This is about the same people who are so worried about their health and everybody’s but somehow have no problem with the government using taxpayer’s monies to provide for needles for the junkies because it will keep them “healthy”. How is that possible when you are contributing to help them shoot poison in their bloodstream is beyond their mental capability.

Oh well, be ready for some interesting viral videos of people freaking out in planes in the near future.

I know you can do that in the pouch, but this?

Sent by angry cybernetic gnomes 

I know you can do that in the pouch, but this?

Sent by angry cybernetic gnomes