Don’t breach your perimeter, the police might murder you
This case is fucking horrific.
New Mexico police fatally shoot man during investigation at wrong home: reports
A New Mexico man was shot and killed by police who mistakenly knocked on his door to investigate a domestic violence incident, according to reports.
Three officers from the Farmington Police Department in northern New Mexico knocked at Robert Dotson’s door at 5305 Valley View Ave earlier this month, even though they questioned dispatchers as to whether they were at the correct address, news outlets and body-camera footage released by the department shows.
Dotson answered the door with a gun in hand, pointing it at the cops — who immediately opened fire, killing him.
Here is the body cam footage.
https://twitter.com/patrickbasedmn/status/1647407373680783366?s=19
It’s dark o’clock.
They know but their announcement “Farmington Police” wasn’t all that loud. I doubt loud enough to be heard from a back bedroom.
They instantly open fire on the man who opened the door.
Now from the perspective of the homeowner, he just got woken up at dark o’clock. From the video, it didn’t look like there were any flashing lights of police cars.
Someone is at his door at an ungodly hour.
He’s gonna take his pistol and see what’s going on.
Completely understandable, until the cops murder him.
As Miguel routinely posts about, the real problem came about when he broke his perimeter.
Don’t open the door.
Yell through the door or use a smart doorbell or anything else that keeps the solid object of the door between yourself and the possible threat on the other side.
Normally when Miguel covers this topic, it’s on regards to criminals.
Here it’s equally good in relation to stupid and negligent police, who are too fucking dumb to respond to the right house.
Stay behind your perimeter where it’s safer.
It will increase your chances of survival.
Example Lawfare
B.L.U.F. When a family is hurting, they want somebody to pay. It is easier to put that anger against a company than a dead body. Especially when there are blood vultures at work.
History
On April 15, 2021, some asshole entered the FedEx facility in Indianapolis, Indiana, and proceeded to start shooting. Eight people were killed, and more were wounded. The asshole then killed himself.
He had two rifles with him, both AR-15-style semi-automatics.
Shortly after, the blood vultures started to congregate. President Biden had flags flown at half-mast. The usual suspects jumped up and down screaming that guns were the problem.
To this day I’ve never had a single firearm give me a motive for anything it has done. That’s because all of them are inanimate objects. Any evil attributed to a firearm is a figment of a human’s mental derangement.
Bains v. American Tactical, Inc
Brilliant CEO my butthole…
From The Daily Mail:
When the CEO of Anheuser-Busch interviews prospective recruits to the world’s biggest brewing conglomerate, he has a favorite question.
‘Tell me about a time that you didn’t succeed or things didn’t go as planned,’ he likes to ask.
How about that time he put a Harvard educated feminist AWFL (Affluent White Female Liberal) in charge of a blue collar beer, where she obviously hated their primary customer base, and she destroyed the legacy of three decades of great marketing campaigns with one TikTok from an obnoxious tranny and cost the company $6B and counting?
How’s that for a fuck-up?
He doesn’t deserve a golden parachute, he needs to be given a sword to fall on.
Also, CIA and Harvard Business School to become CEO at 46? Excuse me while I don my tinfoil hat because a resume like seems like the kind of one perfectly crafted for some elite level political fuckery.
I’d be the one doing jail time
I would have gone through that glass and put that nurse face first into the floor so hard they wouldn’t be able to use dental records to identify her body.
Just What Do All These Legal Cases Mean?
B.L.U.F. — What’s with all these court cases and what does it all mean in the grand scheme of things?
How Come We Have To Work So Hard At This?
If everything was as it should be, when the Bruen Court issued their opinion all of the states would have looked at the laws they currently had in place, looked at what would not pass muster, and then would have created new legislation to bring the state into line with the Bruen decision. The infringing states could not bring themselves to do the right thing.
In fact some (all?) of the infringing states jumped on the “Bruen Response” bandwagon to see who could do the most harm to gun owners the fastest.
This starts the long, slow march back to the Supreme Court to get more of these infringements knocked down.
There is a game that is played to accomplish this because the infringing states want to continue to infringe.
In the best of their imaginary worlds only the people they control who are loyal to them would have guns. And those firearms would not be allowed out of the control of dear leader. In their warped world view a cop would travel to work on public transport, they would be issued their duty weapon(s) and would then do a tour. At the end, they would turn in all their duty weapons and ride public transport home.
There would be nobody to stand up to their will.
To get this they need to disarm The People. This means passing regulations that disarm the people.