Inside a McDonalds one unarmed man accuses another of cutting in front of him and proceeds to threaten him. The accused individual produces a gun and shoots the first guy.  Judge grants Stand Your Ground/Immunity from Prosecution and the shooter goes free.

Hell to be raised by Liberals and Gun Control?

 But the visit to the North Miami-Dade Golden Arches unraveled when another patron accused him of cutting in line to order. That customer, an older white man, suddenly began spouting racial slurs and threats at Gibbs, a young black man. The episode ended with Gibbs in jail — for firing a shot at the irate but unarmed customer, causing panic inside the restaurant.

Nearly three years later, however, Gibbs has been cleared of any crime. He persuaded a Miami judge that he was only acting in self-defense when he fired at Phillip Ledea at the door of the fast food restaurant in December 2015.
A Miami judge this month tossed out felony charges against Gibbs, 25, a part-time dockworker who had gone to McDonald’s to pick up a meal for his son the day after Christmas. He had been charged with aggravated battery with a weapon and carrying a concealed weapon. Ledea was not injured in the shooting.

After racial slurs in Miami McDonald’s line, a shot is fired. Was it self defense?

I barely read the article, so I am not going to make an in-depth analysis of the shooting and the legality. But I wanted to point out how this particular event gets Gun Control and Liberals in a conundrum.:

“Do we condemn the poor Black Guy because he shot an unarmed man? We can’t! That would be racist and he was defending himself from a racist! But if we do not condemn him and agree with the judge decision, the narrative that Stand Your Ground is a tool to oppress African-Americans and other goes down the drain!”

And I love that.