I caught a documentary on HBO this morning called San Francisco 2.0.

It is from 2015 but I’ve never seen (or heard of) it before.  This is the trailer:

The synopsis from HBO doesn’t do it justice.

San Francisco has long enjoyed a reputation as the counterculture capital of America, attracting bohemians, mavericks, progressives and activists. With the onset of the digital gold rush, young members of the tech elite are flocking to the West Coast to make their fortunes, and this new wealth is forcing San Francisco to reinvent itself. But as tech innovations lead America into the golden age of digital supremacy, is it changing the heart and soul of their adopted city?

It is directed by Alexandria Pelosi, who is Nancy Pelosi’s daughter.

So why do I think it is so amazing.  It is 100% pure communist propaganda.

She interviews working class people who do nothing but complain how the “greedy landlords just want more money” and so are using the Ellis Act to evict tenants and sell their properties at market rate for millions of dollars.

Every long time San Francisco resident she interviews complains about the tech people and the coffee shops that are displacing the “heart and soul” of the city.  Forgetting that the heart and soul of the city is synonymous with open air drug use, highly fetishized gay sex, and vandalism.  I don’t care if you have a Caesar Chavez, MLK, and Malcom X standing under a rainbow, when it’s painted on a wall without consent of the owner, it’s vandalism.

Every person interviewed, including the former mayor of the city and the Lt. Governor, Gavin Newsom openly complain about capitalism ruining the city.

The popular sentiment by elected officials was that the tech companies and techies “are not giving enough back to the city.”

One former mayor actually said “it’s not enough to create jobs and pay taxes” the have to take “social responsibility” too.

The idea that is reinforced by every interview is that San Francisco is some sort of special place where money doesn’t matter as much as “culture” and it should somehow be exempted from the regular laws of economics.  Landlords and property owners should rent to people at orders of magnitude below market rate, because…. they should.

Some old guy was interviewed and he’s mad that he has 30 years experience and two degrees but can’t get work with a tech company and has to live in a shitty apartment.  He said “the American dream is dead and it’s now a nightmare.”  But everything he knows is obsolete.  He failed to stay relevant.  That’s his fault.

Of course, there was a racial aspect to it where most of the long term residents complain about the influx of “young white men” and how that is killing the city.

One person complained that the city was turning into Venezuela, with a small population of rich and a large base that can barely afford to live there.

Yes it is and it is because the people of San Francisco have gone down the same path that led the people of Venezuela to elect Chavez the first time around.  They though the laws of economics didn’t apply to them.

No one talked about how hard it is to build new homes in San Francisco and how all the rules and regulations designed to maintain the “heart and soul” constrain the market.  No one made the argument that rent control means that landlords lose money on homes and it is in their best interests to sell the building if they can’t charge rent that allows them to cover expenses.

San Francisco is falling apart because the people there are socialists to the core.

I hope the tech industry buys every square foot of livable space and these people end up homeless.

Why?  Because I’m a mean bastard who believes that if you don’t understand the laws of economics, I want reality to run over you like a damn freight train.




Spread the love

By J. Kb

4 thoughts on “An amazing insight into San Fransico”
  1. One of the industry conferences I rotate through is in San Francisco next year. I openly laughed in my sales reps face when he asked me if I was going. “Does it include new shoes so I don’t bring Hepatitis with me on the plane ride back?”

  2. “But everything he knows is obsolete. He failed to stay relevant.”
    Not necessarily. (I haven’t seen the film, so maybe he, specifically, hasn’t kept current.)
    Age discrimination is very much a thing in Silicon Valley, and has been for at least 20 years. The young whippersnappers who are in charge nowadays assume that (1) they know everything, and (2) nobody over 35 has any relevant knowledge.
    Which means the graybeards, who’ve seen all the mistakes already and know how not to repeat them, are sidelined, unless they get into some branch of the tech business with deeper roots and older managers (military, avionics, industrial automation, that sort of thing).

    1. This guy was obsolete.

      I know that age discrimination exist in the tech industry, but if this guy was smart he’d know to stay away from the startups because of that. If he was still relevant he’d look to Cisco, IBM, HP, etc, an established firm that would value experience and has a CEO over 35.

  3. No real surprise here, HBO is filled with mostly far-left programming anyway. The only good show they have is Game of Thrones, and that only has one season left. After that there will be no reason at all to subscribe to HBO.

Login or register to comment.