Could A Small Nuclear War Reverse Global Warming? | HuffPost Impact
My generation remembers well the concept of Nuclear Winter. But it takes a special kind of disconnected imbecile to even insinuate that a nuclear war is a good thing for the planet. I guess the fucking radiation is not going to affect living creatures.
3 thoughts on “And the stupidest thing you will read today.”
They are already setting the narrative for when Biden kicks off WWIII with the Russians over Ukraine how that’s actually good for us.
Only way a “small nuclear war” could cure “global warming” is if it targeted a gathering of ALL the “believers” when they were gathered in one place…. Heh heh heh…. I thought it was “climate change”….. 37 degrees here this am.. global warming goes to Florida every winter..
Since the end of WWII, the policy of the major players in the nuclear weapons arena (US, UK, USSR/Russia, France, and China) is that there is no such thing as a “small” nuclear war. Use of tactical nukes will automatically lead to a global nuclear war. Also how do you limit the use to only 100 Hiroshima sized bombs? If the looser (and there will be one) decides that they need to send just one more bomb or a bigger bomb to get an advantage over their enemies, the dominoes start falling.
Login or register to comment.