The evidence of Kyle’s innocence is so overwhelming that it brings the biased coverage against him into stark contrast.

I hope a lot more normies see this and realize just how maliciously partisan everything corporate that feeds them information is.

 

Spread the love

By J. Kb

7 thoughts on “Apparently the Rittenhouse trial coverage was doling out some red pills too”
  1. I am noticing a conslicuous lack of coverage about rittenhouse where everyone shot was a white guy and a convicted scumbag and the legal and moral grounds are quite clear and the evidence speaks for itself

    However i am seeing a lot of coverage of the arbuery trial where the white guys kilked a black guy and the legal and moral grounds are not as obvious or clear nor is the evidence.

    Im just paranoid right? /sarc

  2. I have been watching the trial. I didn’t know all the details about the people Mr. Rittenhouse had to shoot. Like all three were convicted felons?

    https://www.snopes.com/news/2020/09/11/rittenhouse-victims-records/

    By the way, the first attacker, the one that attacked Kyle Rittenhouse and set this all in motion? Joseph Rosenbaum was a convicted rapist that served ten years for raping 5 boys aged 5 to 11. Pima County AZ confirmed the sentence and the crimes.

    https://www.quora.com/Was-Joseph-Rosenbaum-who-was-shot-by-Kyle-Rittenhouse-a-convicted-pedophile-2

    Can someone really blow her mind by tweeting back these leftist bubble approved links?

Login or register to comment.