Brady Campaign is smarting the NJ Attorney General decision on Smart Guns. Apparently not Judge Dredd Enough.
The Fight against Bloomberg’s Nevada UBC Initiative has begun. Already finding problems with the signatures collected in one county alone.
Texas bill seek Federal Gun Control Nullification in the State. And apparently they have great support.
Canadian Gun Control Activists recycle the old Bloody Shirt and want more gun control. Not happy about Canadians actually having the tools to defend themselves against people who may kill them.
Stand Your Ground Case reaches Florida Supreme Court. Where the heck is Andrew Branca when we need an explanation? It looks as a good case to win for our side…
And in the meantime in Detroit:
Andrew Branca now has a post at Legal Insurrection about the Bretherick case, which is about self-defense immunity rather than “stand-your-ground”.
As LoFan John points out, Andrew Branca posted on it here.
To whit, it’s not a “Stand Your Ground” case, but a general self-defense immunity case. The question is: who bears the burden of proof in a self-defense immunity hearing, the defendant or the State? Does the defendant have to prove (by a preponderance of evidence) that they qualify for immunity, or does the prosecutor have to prove that they don’t?