awa

Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland

When we discuss the horrors of Nazi Germany, many people claim that they would not have turned a blind eye to the atrocities that were taking place. They are full of it. They are mistaken in every way.

There is the Stanford Prison Experiment, where they took volunteers and broke them into two groups, guards and prisoners. Within days, the guards were acting in some of the most atrocious ways possible. Every time the experiment has been repeated, the same results occur.

At Yale, Stanley Milgram conducted an experiment where he had two volunteers come up. They drew for who would play the interrogator and who would be interrogated. The draw was fixed, and the shill was always picked to be interrogated.

The interrogator would then ask questions of the “victim.” If the victim answered incorrectly, the interrogator would move a dial to increase the voltage being applied to the victim.

The entire thing was rigged. There was only one shock given, that was the first, which was given to the actual volunteer, so they would know what was happening to the victim.

Nearly every person who participated in the experiment went all the way to 300 volts. 65% went to the maximum of 450 volts.

The Milgram experiment has been repeated, and the results are consistent.

This is not to excuse the atrocities of the Germans, it is to strongly suggest that it wasn’t the German culture that allowed them to do this to their fellow humans, it was human nature.

In some ways, we can see the same things happening in our country. People that say, “You owning a gun makes me feel unsafe. Since I feel that you will use that gun to kill me or somebody else, you should not have guns. If you don’t give up your gun, I will send the police to take it from you by force, potentially ending up with your death.”

We see it in the othering that happens consistently. How many times have you heard somebody refer to “Maggots” or similar?

Unfortunately, the book is a little dry. It is a difficult read because it was written as a scholarly paper that was turned into a book. The hardbound copy is expensive. The book is filled with numbers, place names and unit names and numbers. Which makes it difficult for many people.

Netflix has turned the book in to an hour-long short. If you have not read the book, take the time to watch it. There are still many numbers, but it is easier to handle. They use a mix of historical images and film mixed with modern re-enactors to create a sense of history that is strong.

If you have read the book, the video is worth watching just for the historical footage and to get a better feel of the men.
Christopher R. Browning, Ordinary men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the final solution in Poland (HarperCollins 1st ed ed. 1992)

Costs of Litigation

In Fraser v. BATFaE the plaintiffs (good guys) said that 18, 19, and 20 year-olds are part of The People and that the government was infringing.

On May 10, 2023, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. The court then ordered the winning party, the good guys, to submit their costs for payment by the losing side, the government.

This case as only made it to the district court level. The lawyers involved are at the good but not great level.

The lawyers are reporting: $900+ in expenses, 230+ hours of billable time at $495/hour for a total billable of $107,368.50

The final order in the case was entered on Aug. 24, 2023. In general, the losing side has 30 days to appeal. The state has requested a stay pending appeal, which has been granted. It does not look like the state has appealed this case.

It would be good for us if they did appeal. While it would hurt 18, 19, and 20 year-olds, having a Circuit Court find in our favor has more impact than just a district court.

Hunter Biden Charges

We should all be aware of 18 U.S.C. 922(g). This is the definition of prohibited person.

(g) It shall be unlawful for any person
(1) who has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
(2) who is a fugitive from justice;
(3) who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802));
(4) who has been adjudicated as a mental defective or who has been committed to a mental institution;
(5) who, being an alien
(A) is illegally or unlawfully in the United States; or
(B) except as provided in subsection (y)(2), has been admitted to the United States under a nonimmigrant visa (as that term is defined in section 101(a)(26) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(26)));
(6) who has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions;
(7) who, having been a citizen of the United States, has renounced his citizenship;
(8) who is subject to a court order that
(A) was issued after a hearing of which such person received actual notice, and at which such person had an opportunity to participate;
(B) restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner of such person or child of such intimate partner or person, or engaging in other conduct that would place an intimate partner in reasonable fear of bodily injury to the partner or child; and
(C)(i) includes a finding that such person represents a credible threat to the physical safety of such intimate partner or child; or
(ii) by its terms explicitly prohibits the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against such intimate partner or child that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury; or
(9) who has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence,
Christopher R. Browning, Ordinary men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the final solution in Poland (HarperCollins 1st ed ed. 1992)

Hunter is charged under §922(g)(3) which is unlawful user of any controlled substance. This is being challenged at the district and circuit levels and is likely to end up at the Supreme Court. This is a Second Amendment challenge. If this challenge is made, I hope that Hunter wins.

There are two other charges, §922(a)(6) and §924(a)(2), lying on a form 4473, and §924(a)(1)(A), lying to an FFL about information placed on a 4473.

General Flynn was charged with making false statements to the FBI. That is what got him in so much hot water. It wasn’t what he was accused of doing, but instead of lying to the FBI.

At this point, the Hunter case is under extreme scrutiny. The Judge in the case is already upset about the games played to give Hunter a “get out of jail free” card.

Even if Hunter wins against the §922(g)(3), there is every reason to believe that he will be found guilty on the other two counts.

Clearly, this will not be a fair trial. It isn’t like Hunter is going to get 22 years for three counts of felonious conduct. It isn’t like he was in a different city while the mob walked through the capitol. That was worth 22 years of a man’s life.

The case is United States v. Biden, 1:23-cr-00061, (D. Del.)

Bibliography

Christopher R. Browning, Ordinary men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the final solution in Poland (HarperCollins 1st ed ed. 1992)

Shopping! Update.

I have heard from J.Kb. that the patches are not yet in his hands. It will be a couple of days still. I’ve marked the product as being on backorder.

I’ve reached out to a supplier for shirts, hats and such. It is possible, but the cost might be higher than we want to pay.

So far, we have “Don’t Break The Perimeter” and “The Second Amendment Applies to Everyone”.

For something larger:

Hosea 8:7
For they have sown the wind,
and they shall reap the whirlwind:
it hath no stalk;
the bud shall yield no meal:
if so be it yield,
the strangers shall swallow it up

Hagar has a couple of shirt designs in the works. We just need to be able to source them at reasonable cost.

Friday Feedback

We opened up the shop to the world, and this might actually work.

J.Kb. has some items to ship, and I have one to ship. We’ll get them out shortly.

The patches are estimated to be delivered from the embroiderer September 29.  Shipping will begin the first week of October.

We had a request for PayPal. I got rid of my PayPal account years ago when they became extremely anti-gun. For you, I’ll look into it.

The New Mexico Governor’s “I get to say when the Constitution applies” Emergency order with attending Public Health Order was stopped in its tracks.

It is so bad over there that the New Mexico Attorney General refused to provide a lawyer for the case. In all the cases I’ve been following, this is the first one where the state had filed no paperwork before the first hearing.

Instead, the Governor sent his office’s lawyer.

The governor named Holly Agajanian, an attorney most recently with the firm Hinkle Shanor LLP, as general counsel of her office. Agajanian has extensive trial and courtroom experience representing public entities, corporations and individuals in a wide range of matters. Having earned an undergraduate degree from the University of California at Los Angeles and her law degree from American University, Agajanian holds an AV Preeminent Rating from Martindale Hubbell, the highest peer rating for professional excellence in attorneys.

I have not seen a transcript nor an audio recording of the hearing. I do not know what was said. I did read the clerk’s notes on the hearing. It doesn’t sound like the state put up much of a fight.

On the fun side of things, I got to actually help on the case. The NAGR v. Grisham case had a new filing today by the plaintiffs (good guys). The lawyer who filed it had a finger slip. He was asking for a preliminary injunction and accidentally wrote a Temporary Restraining Order.

I noticed and fired off a short email to him asking if he had made a mistake. He replied almost instantly with a “Thank You”. I expect a new corrected filing tomorrow.

Yes, my arm hurts from patting myself on the back.

Miguel suggests “Don’t Break The Perimeter” for swag.

Hagar is putting together some images for the different donation products.

Any suggestions you might have, please let us know.

If you are interested in shirts, what size? Polo or T-shirt? Polo with or without pockets?

Shop Status Update – UPDATED

How to access the shop

On a large screen, the “shop” button is located in the header next to the “about” button on the lower left of the header banner. You have direct access to the cart, checkout, and your account from a dropdown on the right.

If you are on a mobile device, there is a “hamburger” button in the center between the home and search buttons. Press that and a menu will open.

The “shop” button can then be pressed to take you directly to the shop. This is a change from this morning.

Further down is the “cart” button with a plus sign. If you press that, it will show you a submenu. Press any of the options to go to that page, including the “cart” button. Yes, it looks like a title, it is a live button.


Thanks to David, I was informed that the shop wasn’t allowing checkouts. It does now. I had put the wrong credentials into the system.

There are both physical and virtual products available in the shop. There is a “Cup of Coffee”, “1 Month Server Hosting”, and “1 Month Web Services”. These are donations. In the near future, I hope to put a block under the banner saying something like “This month’s hosting by NAME, this month’s services by NAME”

The patches and Velcro are real. That will take us a little time to get all worked out. We have two “warehouses” so we have to coordinate shipping, so you get what you ordered.

Thank you for your support, it means a great deal to us.
-AWA

National Association for Gun Rights v. Grisham

B.L.U.F.
Judge David H. Urias has granted a TRO staying the power grab in New Mexico by their governor.

(700 words)


Steps in a suit:

  1. File the Complaint requesting an injunction: Sep 9, 2023
  2. Request A Temporary Injunction while paper work is filed: Sep 9, 2023
  3. Briefings filed: Not done
  4. Hearing on the motion for TRO: Sep 13, 2023
  5. Briefings, Motions, and cross motions for a preliminary injunction
  6. Hearing on the preliminary injunction
  7. Briefings, Motions, and cross motions for Summary Judgement
  8. Hearing on the motions for Summary Judgement
  9. Briefings, Motions, and cross motions for injunctive relief
  10. Hearing on the merits for injunctive relief
  11. Court issues opinion
I can see no indication that the state even showed up for this hearing. I don’t see any indication that a subpoena was issued, that there was proof of service, nor do I see any indication of an attorney of record supporting the state in this case.

At any point where the judge issues or denies a TRO, Preliminary Injunction, a Summary Judgement, or a finding, the losing party can appeal. Once the appeal is made, the case is on hold until the Circuit court issues their opinion. Once the Circuit court issues their opinion, the case will go back to the district court OR the losing party will appeal to the Supreme Court.

The Judge issued the TRO today, the Sep 13, 2023.
Read More