I’m pretty sure it does
Of all the statements I’ve every hear made my a jurist, this is perhaps the worst.
“Do not bring the Second Amendment into this courtroom. It doesn’t exist here. So you can’t argue Second Amendment. This is New York.”
I am pretty sure the Second Amendment exists in New York.
There was recently, an entire Supreme Court decision explicitly stating that the Second Amendment applied in New York.
For background:
A Brooklyn man has been convicted of 13 weapons charges after having been arrested and charged in 2022 for building his own firearms.
Taylor, a 52-year-old New York native and a software engineer, discovered the world of gunsmithing years ago. He decided to take it up as a hobby and possibly turn it into a business later. However, when a joint ATF/NYPD task force discovered he was legally buying parts from various companies, they opened up an investigation that led to a SWAT raid and arrest.
During an interview with Vinoo Varghese, Taylor’s defense lawyer, he detailed how Taylor’s trial proceeded and highlighted a distinct bias in favor of the prosecution.
Varghese described how Taylor became fascinated by weapon science during the COVID-19 lockdowns, which inspired him to take up his gunsmithing hobby. “He ended up building, I believe it was eight pistols and five rifles or six rifles, AR-style rifles, and then eight or nine Glock pistols that he built,” Varghese said.
From the beginning of Taylor’s trial, it was evident that the court would be biased against the defendant, according to Varghese, who explained that two judges presided over his case before the current official, Judge Abena Darkeh, took over.
The judge disrupted Varghese’s opening statement multiple times as he tried to set the stage for Taylor’s defense. Even further, she admonished the defense to refrain from mentioning the Second Amendment during the trial. Varghese told RedState:
She told us, ‘Do not bring the Second Amendment into this courtroom. It doesn’t exist here. So you can’t argue Second Amendment. This is New York.’
I would suspect that such a statement would be grounds for appeal.
A judge outright denying a Constitutional right in court as the basis for a defense is not something that should not be allowed to stand.
I’m sure she shouldn’t be allowed to be a judge anymore for saying something so egregious.
This does go to show you that New Yorkers do not think of themselves as Americans, but something superior to the rest of the country.