This grotesquely obvious Tweet from Bloomberg News:

An income of $300,000 is in the top 98.9%.

So pretty much, everyone who is not in the top 1% is getting fucked.

The political elite in this country, people worth millions of dollars despite years and decades on government salaries, are insulated from the negative effects of their policies by their money while the rest of us suffer.

I keep saying what is being done is not incompetence.

It’s malicious.

It is the elite grinding us into the ground, reminding us of our place under their boot heel.

We were supposed to elect Hillary Clinton.

We were supposed to let them grift their way into more wealth.

But we didn’t elect Hillary.

We elected Trump, and for four years we prospered.

They wrestled back the reins of power under despicable circumstances and now will make us pay for our insolence.

We are entering a world of neo-feudalism.

Either you are a member of the top 1% as a member of the well-connected managerial elite, or you will be ground into economic hardship until you learn to live in a pod, eat bugs, and take public transportation to your soulless job as a drone in a mega-corporation.

As I prepared my last post and read articles on why people are justifying gay romance on kids movies, one theme, and more specifically one word, keeps coming up: representation.

I’ve seen this a lot.  Whenever a movie with an obviously engineered “cast of diverse characters” comes out, or an existing franchise has established characters replaced with diverse characters, you see the word representation used.

I’ve read countless OpEds why it’s so important that the next James Bond, Superman, The Doctor, or whomever is a black transgender non-binary disabled lesbian, just so the writer can feel representation in the movies.

I have to say, I have only once, sort of, seen myself represented in a movie or on TV.

But J.Kb, how can you say that?  There are lots of white and Jewish male characters on TV.

Easy, none of them represented me, except make one.  And he wasn’t played by a Jewish actor.

I hate just about every Jewish character I’ve ever seen.

To the man they are weak, sickly, nerdy, awkward, Jewey characters.

They are every stereotype of the pushover Jewish guy who lives with his mom, or surrogate mom wife, is a boneless as a gifilte fish, and is so sickly he’s taken out by a glass of milk.

If you watch movies, every Jewish man is a five-foot five-inch, hen-picked accountant from NYC with an inhaler.

That’s not me not do I want it to be.

There are many Jewish actors in Hollywood who don’t fit this stereotype.

James Caan

Harvey Kitel

Oded Fehr

Mandy Patinkin

Ron Perlman

But they never play Jewish characters.

(Singlular exception being Kitel very recently playing Meyer Lansky.)

The only Jewish character I ever identified with was Walter Sobchak.

A fat, bearded Jewish guy with anger issues, a penchant for carry vest and cargo shorts, who drives a full size van, and packs a 1911.

That’s pretty much me.

And he was played by the not Jewish John Goodman.

So maybe I’ll start to care more about representation when ever representation of what is supposed to be me isn’t a grotesque and offensive caricature.

I’m getting pretty sure that QAnon will turn out to be the most factually accurate reporting on the planet.

It is shocking, absolutely shocking, how a small minority of people managed to get themselves into positions where they then force grooming and sexual degeneracy into children, despite the overwhelming will of parents.

Workers at animation studio Pixar claim that Disney execs have demanded they cut ‘nearly every moment of overtly gay affection’: CEO Bob Chapek is under fire for not opposing so-called ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill

Pixar employees have accused their parent company Disney of cutting gay characters from their films, in the latest salvo fired by staff amid a row about the entertainment giant’s stance on gay rights.

Disney CEO Bob Chapek, who only took over in January, has been criticized for not condemning a Florida bill passed on Tuesday limiting LGBTQ discussion in schools.

In a memo to staff on Monday, Chapek tried to quell the anger, writing: ‘I want to be crystal clear: I and the entire leadership team unequivocally stand in support of our LGBTQ+ employees, their families, and their communities. And, we are committed to creating a more inclusive company – and world.’

Yet on Thursday, Pixar staff questioned the company’s claims in a letter obtained by Variety.

‘We at Pixar have personally witnessed beautiful stories, full of diverse characters, come back from Disney corporate reviews shaved down to crumbs of what they once were,’ the letter states.

‘Even if creating LGBTQIA+ content was the answer to fixing the discriminatory legislation in the world, we are being barred from creating it.’

The letter claims that ‘nearly every moment of overtly gay affection’ had been cut, despite ‘protest from both the creative teams and executive leadership.’

Why are Pixar employees trying to force gay relationships into kids’ movies?

Are they planning a another Cars movie full of Jettas, Miatas, and Subarus?

Good for Disney for remembering that they are a family movie company and stopping that…

Oh never mind.

Same-Sex Kiss Restored in Pixar’s ‘Lightyear’ Following Staff Uproar Over ‘Don’t Say Gay’ Bill (EXCLUSIVE)

On March 9, LGBTQ employees and allies at Pixar Animation Studios sent a joint statement to Walt Disney Company leadership claiming that Disney executives had actively censored “overtly gay affection” in its feature films. The stunning allegation — made as part of a larger protest over the company’s lack of public response to Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill — did not include which Pixar films had weathered the censorship, nor which specific creative decisions were cut or altered.

But in at least one case, the statement appears to have made a significant difference.

According to a source close to the production, Pixar’s next feature film, “Lightyear” — starring Chris Evans as the putative real-life inspiration for the “Toy Story” character Buzz Lightyear — does feature a significant female character, Hawthorne (voiced by Uzo Aduba), who is in a meaningful relationship with another woman. While the fact of that relationship was never in question at the studio, a kiss between the characters had been cut from the film. Following the uproar surrounding the Pixar employees’ statement and Disney CEO Bob Chapek’s handling of the “Don’t Say Gay” bill, however, the kiss was reinstated into the movie last week.

The LGBT groomer demographic at Disney go butthurt (metaphorically) and Disney folded rather than have the internet hate mob go after them.

You know, absolutely know for an absolute fact, that the lesbian kiss WILL NOT be left in the Chinese cut of that movie.

So we have a company that was built on family friendly children’s entertainment and now it contains a contingent of activist employees who have the goal of injecting their groomer sexual proclivities into that entertainment, and a multi billion dollar corporation bows to them.

And parents, by and large, don’t want this.

So tell me again how the idea that major sectors of government and business are not run by a small pedophile oligarchy that exists to groom children.

I can’t wait to hear it.

Wide margin of voters support key element of Florida sex education bill, poll finds

A wide margin of American voters support banning the teaching of sexual orientation and gender identity to students from kindergarten to third grade, a key element of Florida’s controversial sexual education bill, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll.

Fifty-one percent of Americans who responded to the poll say they support “banning the teaching of sexual orientation and gender identity from kindergarten through third grade” while 35% are opposed, representing a 16-point margin. Also, 52% of respondents say they supported limiting the same type of discussion in other grades based on how “age-appropriate” they are.

So despite a massive and unified media campaign against the bill, and the POLITICO poll calling the bill by it’s inaccurate media appellation, it still got majority support.

Americans don’t like grooming children but the radical Left is intent on doing it anyway.

I’m glad polling like this is comming out and the tide is starting to turn.

Child groomers need to understand,we are not locked in here with them, they are locked in here with us.

And if they want to die on the hill of being allowed to groom children, I am happy to oblige them with woodchippers.

“It means the world to be here.”

Lia Thomas spoke about swimming in the NCAA women’s championships. pic.twitter.com/aP0afVA0KE

— SportsCenter (@SportsCenter) March 18, 2022

I absolutely will not submit to this.

This is a dude.  He does not belong on a women’s swim team.

I will not accept saying things I know are factually wrong because some fraction of influential society wants me to.

2 + 2 = 4

There are four lights.

And that dude brought a dick and balls into a women’s sport.

We need to push back.

We must push back.

Every G-d damn day feels like an episode of The Twilight Zone.

I saw this Tweet:

One was designed to be practical for average suburban folks to carry stuff on a regular basis. The other was designed to make guys feel like they are tough and rule the road. pic.twitter.com/qGSDA0BvbK

— Peter Flax (@Pflax1) March 12, 2022

If you go into the threat it is full of like-minded twats who feel a deep compulsion to tell you what you should want and what you should be allowed to have, and do so entirely from ignorance.

There were several who insisted that if you really needed a pickup, one of those Japanese mini-trucks (the kind that are not street legal in the US) is just as good as an F-150 because thr bed lengths are nearly the same.

Yup. And the thing is, the smaller truck has 90% of bed length (the useful part) as the bigger truck pic.twitter.com/SNvxufs2GJ

— ben doherty (@bendoherty161) March 13, 2022

I’m not going to tell you what sort of truck you should have.

I have two, a big 2500 and a smaller Toyota.

I love them both for different reasons.

And as an American, it’s my prerogative to spend my money how I want.

(I agree with the great Iowahawk that there should be a 2A for cars and personal transportation.)

But as a friend reminded me, the great Robert A. Heinlein wrote in The Moon is a Harsh Mistress:

“Thing that got me was not her list of things she hated, since she was obviously crazy as a Cyborg, but fact that always somebody agreed with her prohibitions. Must be a yearning deep in human heart to stop other people from doing as they please. Rules, laws — always for other fellow. A murky part of us, something we had before we came down out of trees, and failed to shuck when we stood up. Because not one of those people said: “Please pass this so that I won’t be able to do something I know I should stop.” Nyet, tovarishchee, was always something they hated to see neighbors doing. Stop them “for their own good” — not because speaker claimed to be harmed by it.”

Fine, I want to fight fire with fire.  And one fire of the Left is to impose taxes as a punitive measure against things they don’t like.

I don’t like busy body twats who want to tell you how to live.

So I will impose a tax.  Every time a busy body twat does something like this they get taxed and that money subsidizes the purchase of an assault rifle, high capacity magazine, big block V8 pickup, or whatever else the busy body wants to eliminate because they are a miserable twat.

Update:

This proves my point.

https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1503785848411770883

Yglesias is a Harvard educated writer for Vox.

His goal at family gatherings is to get his hard working, salt of the earth, rather father in law to shit on guys who drive pick-ups in the suburbs.

The idea being the typical Leftist appeal to authority fallacy.

I.e.: This man is a farmer. I, the Leftist writer, have decided that he qualifies to own a big truck for work.  I will use him as an authority to declare that suburbanites so not need the same kind of truck he does.  If the farmer days you don’t need a truck, you don’t need a truck. 

Fundamentally I ask, why the fuck is it Matt Yglesias’ business what you or I choose to drive if we can afford it?

It’s not.

But Yglesias cannot help himself.  He must be a busy body that that must be the arbiter of who does and who does not need a truck of a certain kind.

My tax will bankrupt Yglesias and I might even possibly annull his marriage for being a that of a son in law.

I guess we know why this Administration selected her.

This massive thread from Senator Josh Hawley:

I’ve been researching the record of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, reading her opinions, articles, interviews & speeches. I’ve noticed an alarming pattern when it comes to Judge Jackson’s treatment of sex offenders, especially those preying on children

— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) March 16, 2022

Here is it unrolled for easy reading:

I’ve been researching the record of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, reading her opinions, articles, interviews & speeches. I’ve noticed an alarming pattern when it comes to Judge Jackson’s treatment of sex offenders, especially those preying on children

Judge Jackson has a pattern of letting child porn offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes, both as a judge and as a policymaker. She’s been advocating for it since law school. This goes beyond “soft on crime.” I’m concerned that this a record that endangers our children

As far back as her time in law school, Judge Jackson has questioned making convicts register as sex offenders – saying it leads to “stigmatization and ostracism.” She’s suggested public policy is driven by a “climate of fear, hatred & revenge” against sex offenders

Judge Jackson has also questioned sending dangerous sex offenders to civil commitment. We have a civil commitment law in Missouri, and it protects children

It gets worse. As a member of the U.S. Sentencing Commission, Judge Jackson advocated for drastic change in how the law treats sex offenders by eliminating the existing mandatory minimum sentences for child porn

Judge Jackson has said that some people who possess child porn “are in this for either the collection, or the people who are loners and find status in their participation in the community.” What community would that be? The community of child exploiters?

Judge Jackson has opined there may be a type of “less-serious child pornography offender” whose motivation is not sexual but “is the challenge, or to use the technology.” A “less-serious” child porn offender?

In her time on the U.S. Sentencing Commission, Judge Jackson said she “mistakingly assumed that child pornography offenders are pedophiles” and she wanted “to understand this category of nonpedophiles who obtain child pornography.”

On the federal bench, Judge Jackson put her troubling views into action. In every single child porn case for which we can find records, Judge Jackson deviated from the federal sentencing guidelines in favor of child porn offenders

In the case of United States v. Hawkins, the sex offender had multiple images of child porn. He was over 18. The Sentencing Guidelines called for a sentence of up to 10 years. Judge Jackson sentenced the perpetrator to only 3 months in prison. Three months.

In United States v. Stewart, the criminal possessed thousands of images of child porn and also hoped to travel across state lines to abuse a 9-year-old girl. The Guidelines called for a sentence of 97-121 months. Judge Jackson sentenced the criminal to just 57 months.

In United States v. Cooper, in which the criminal had more than 600 images and videos and posted many on a public blog, the Guidelines called for a sentence of 151-188 months.

Judge Jackson settled on 60 months, the lowest possible sentence allowed by law.
In United States v. Chazin, the offender had 48 files of child porn, which he had accessed over a period of years. The Guidelines recommended 78-97 months. Judge Jackson gave him 28.

In United States v. Downs, the perp posted multiple images to an anonymous instant messaging app, including an image of a child under the age of 5. The Guidelines recommended 70-87 months. Judge Jackson gave him the lowest sentence allowed by law, 60 months

In United States v. Sears, the sex offender distributed more than 102 child porn videos. He also sent lewd pictures of his own 10-year-old daughter. The Guidelines recommended 97-121 months in prison. Judge Jackson gave him 71 months.

In United States v. Savage, the sex offender was convicted of travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, and also admitted to transporting child porn. The Guidelines recommended 46-57 months. Judge Jackson gave him 37.

This is a disturbing record for any judge, but especially one nominated to the highest court in the land. Protecting the most vulnerable shouldn’t be up for debate. Sending child predators to jail shouldn’t be controversial.

So far, the Sentencing Commission has refused to turn over all Judge Jackson’s records from her time there. In light of what we have learned, this stonewalling must end. We must get access to all relevant records.

So Biden’s SCOTUS nominee is a Jew hating, pedophile lover who goes easy on child sex criminals and traffics in Black Hebrew Israelite conspiracy theories.

By the standards of the new Progressive Democrat party, she’s a keeper.

A perfect representation of what they stand for now.