J. Kb

Why they have to beatify every criminal

 

No concealed carry permit holder that I’m aware of has ever shot a minority citizen for demanding equality or equal status.

This is why they have to push the narrative that “[criminal] was shot for walking while black,” or some other similar type statement.

They cannot acknowledge that most of these shoots are good shoots because these people do not want to live in a polite society.

They want to live in a society of anarcho-tryanny where thugs and criminals can commit crimes unmolested and law abiding citizen cower in fear, defenseless.

So they beatify every criminal so that the narrative turns into a poor minority killed for wanted to be an equal person instead of a criminal choosing the wrong target.

The homeless vagrant on the subway isn’t demanding equality.  He’s robbing you with the threat of violence.

 

The fuck is going on in Texas

On Saturday, a mass shooter killed nine people at an outlet mall in Allen, Texas.

Here is video of the shooter after being killed by law enforcement. (Graphic)

https://twitter.com/IsaakRuizBeast/status/1655314293468852231?s=19

Note the tattoo on his hand.

He’s fairly well kitted out.

The shooter has been identified as Mauricio Garcia.  He lived at home with his parents, who don’t speak English.

This was from today:

https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1655369672768856065?s=19

 

You can see from the arrest video that it’s the sane guy.

How does a shirtless, tatted up guy like that get behind the wheel of a $100,000 Range Rover?

Keep in mind, Title 42 is about to end.

Do we have a cartel turf war brewing in theUSS over human trafficking?

Maybe these events have nothing to do with one another, but this is a lot of casualties for a weekend in Texas.

This just seem like too much of a coincidence to me.

I support violent overreaction

I saw this Tweet and it made an good point:

 

It links to this YouTube video, which is excellent:

 

I will go further.

Mid-level violence is worse than conventional violence because it intends to strip you of your dignity.

You may fight back and lose to conventional violence, but you can fight back.

Mid-level violence requires that you sit there and take it.  You humiliate yourself and surrender your dignity as you do nothing, impotently, as you are tormented.

I believe the moral thing, and should be the legal thing, is to respond to mid-level violence with overwhelming violence.

When someone dumps glitter on you, punch them in the face, and when they hit the ground, kick them in the face until they spit out all of their teeth.

When some upper middle-class white college student has to look in the mirror and put in her dentures every morning, she will have learned her lesson.

When the protesters block the highway, use a diesel F-350 with a snow plow to clear them at 70 mph.

When Antifa forms a wall of plywood or trashcan lid shields, open up on them with M249s and green tip.

It isn’t just the inconvenience, it is the assault on your dignity that must be responded to.

Is it, and I’m not walking this back, second only to rape as an attack on your soul.

It demands that you allow yourself to be violated.

It is that evil.

Which is why I believe mid-level violence demands overwhelming violence.

When they demand your humiliation, they deserve to lose their lives.

Battered New Yorker Syndrome

This Tweet:

 

What the actual fuck?

If you live in New York, you just understand that insane, violent, dangerous vagrants are a fact of life.

They patrol the city streets and public transportation.

The city does not keep them in check.

Just don’t make eye contact with them or draw attention to yourself, and hope they pass you hy without assaulting you.

I’ll tell you what comes to mind: battered wife syndrome.

This has to be some sort of emotional damage that people think it’s normal to pay huge sums in taxes to a municipality that does not to deal with dangerous vagrants, and then not to defend themselves and instead hope to be unmolested by trying to be inconspicuous.

This is battered New Yorker syndrome.

And if that’s not enough, there is the New York version of Stockholm syndrome.

 

When a dangerous vagrant assaults you, it’s your job to assess your own privilege and empathize with and understand the dangerous vagrant because he’s in pain.  More pain than the pain he’s causing you by shoving you head first onto the subway tracks.

If you’re trying to rationalize why you can’t defend yourself and should be submissive to an insane person attacking you, you are emotionally damaged.

The only conclusion I can draw is that living in NYC breaks people down and leaves then all with mental illness.

Gaslighting the danger

On Monday, a black man named Jordan Neely died as the result of a choke hold applied to him by a white passenger aboard an NYC subway.

America instantly split into two camps:

Neely was lynched because America is evil and racist.

The passenger who choked Neely was a hero for defending people from a violent crazy person.

One of the stranger arguments made by the former camp is that crazy people on the subway are normal.  Just one of those quirky, local favor things about living in NYC.

 

This is the video going around of Neely.  This is what they want you to believe crazy homeless people on the subway are like.

 

They are harmless entertainment.

Other videos show what crazy homeless on the subway are really like.

https://twitter.com/RickTheTank/status/1109197447006486528?s=19

https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1654495264122478595?s=20

 

Neely has 42 prior arrests for various violent crimes.

It’s not quirky local flavor to be tormented and assaulted on public transportation.

That’s not how life should be in a functional civil society.

The people who are trying to convince you that it is are pushing anarchotyranny.  They are trying to convince you that you have no right to expect a quality of life despite all you pay in taxes and fees.