Three stories out of California.

Total COVID obedience:

California’s Misbegotten Misinformation Bill

Introduced in February 2022 by California assembly member Evan Low and now awaiting the signature of the governor, Gavin Newsom, the bill designated as AB 2098 would allow state medical boards to punish physicians who spread misinformation or disinformation regarding Covid-19 and its treatment options. The bill defines “misinformation” as “false information that is contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus contrary to the standard of care” and “disinformation” as misinformation provided with “malicious intent or an intent to mislead.” Jokes about a Covid-19 “ministry of truth” aside, the bill represents an alarming push to create scientific consensus through government force rather than open debate and the gradual accumulation of evidence.

What is the “scientific consensus?”

Remember Fauci said don’t wear a mask, then do wear one, then wear two or more, then only N95, then only kids need to wear them, now who the fuck knows anymore?

What about vaccines that were 100% effective at preventing transmission of the virus, only after boosters, every few weeks, that don’t actually stop the transmission of the virus?

“Scientific consensus” appears to be exactly what a government board thinks at a specific instance in time.

Doctors have no choice but to obey or be punished with attacks on their professional licensure.

There is no room for experience or inquiry.  Obey or be destroyed.

Genital mutilation sanctuary state:


Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco)’s legislation to provide refuge for trans kids and their families, Senate Bill 107. It will take effect on January 1, 2023. SB 107 will protect trans kids and their families if they flee to California from Alabama, Texas, Idaho or any other state criminalizing the parents of trans kids for allowing them to receive gender-affirming care. If these parents and their kids come to California, the legislation will help protect them from having their kids taken away from them or from being criminally prosecuted for supporting their trans kids’ access to healthcare.

SB 107 has three main components:

1) It prohibits the enforcement of a law of another state that authorizes a state agency to remove a child from their parent or guardian based on the parent or guardian allowing their child to receive gender-affirming health care. The bill would prevent California’s law enforcement from cooperating with any individual or out-of-state agency regarding the provision of lawful gender-affirming health care performed in this state. As a result, families will be able to come to California to avoid having their trans children taken away from them.

2) It bars compliance in California with any out-of-state subpoena seeking health or other related information about people who come to California to receive gender-affirming care, if the subpoena relates to efforts to criminalize individuals or remove children from their homes for having received gender-affirming care. Some states are considering legislation that would extend their criminal prohibitions even to residents who travel out of state to receive gender-affirming health care.

3) It prohibits law enforcement participation in the arrest or extradition of an individual that criminalizes allowing a person to receive or provide gender-affirming health care where that conduct is lawful in California and to the fullest extent permitted by federal law. It will declare that it is California’s public policy that any out-of-state criminal arrest warrant for someone based on violating another state’s law against receiving gender-affirming care is the lowest priority for law enforcement in California.

So a child who has been convinced they are transgender can run away to or be kidnapped and transported to California and California will allow that child to have gender affirming hormones and surgery (chemical and surgical mutilation) and will block parent from out of state from stopping it.

How long until some groomer teacher or groomer influencer transports a child to California for mutilation against the will of the parents?

Remember that Scott Weiner is the California state senator who wrote the bill that made it no longer a felony to deliberately give someone HIV and to remove gay pedophiles from the sex offender registry.

California has gone all in on child sexual mutilation.

California colleges go Judrnfrei:

Berkeley Develops Jewish-Free Zones

Nine different law student groups at the University of California at Berkeley’s School of Law, my own alma mater, have begun this new academic year by amending bylaws to ensure that they will never invite any speakers that support Israel or Zionism. And these are not groups that represent only a small percentage of the student population. They include Women of Berkeley Law, Asian Pacific American Law Students Association, Middle Eastern and North African Law Students Association, Law Students of African Descent and the Queer Caucus. Berkeley Law’s Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, a progressive Zionist, has observed that he himself would be banned under this standard, as would 90% of his Jewish students.

Putting legal precedents aside, major universities generally require student groups to accept “all comers,” regardless of “status of beliefs.” They also adopt rules, aligned with federal and state law, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of various classifications such as race, ethnicity, heritage or religion. Those who adopt such rules may not exclude Jews from these protections.

The real issue here is discrimination, not speech. By adopting anti-Jewish bylaw provisions, these groups are restricting their successors from cooperating with pro-Israel speakers and groups. In this way, the exclusionary bylaws operate like racially restrictive covenants, precluding minority participation into perpetuity.

So pretty much all Jews who are not Leftist yevsektsiya are not allowed to speak on campus at the behest of all the other Woke identity groups.

So what has California become?

Medical practitioners must obey government boards as to what they must and cannot say about a disease or treatment or they will lose their license.

Children cannot be protected from ideologically motivated doctors mutilating them surgically.

(Note the contradiction here.  Doctors will be punished for questioning the efficacy of a COVID vaccine but not for saying that a boy can become a girl, inverting his penis, sewing it to a length of resected bowel, and calling that a vagina.)

Jews do not have equal rights or are welcomed onto university campuses.

I feel like I’ve seen this in my history books before and it wasn’t good.


Spread the love

By J. Kb

3 thoughts on “Califonia is an evil, Woke, fascist hell-state”
  1. Just like IL and NY, the state is completely lost. The only hope is for people to vote w/ their feet and get out. One can hope that a future federal admin would be willing to file kidnapping/trafficking charges against CA bureaucrats that actively prevent parents from recovering their children.

    1. Seems like the State, and the Governor who signed this and the legislators who voted for it, jointly and severally, would be accessories before the fact to any interstate kidnappings inspired by this, no?
      And… the mere act of passing and signing such a bill would constitute incitement of imminent lawless behavior, wouldn’t it?

  2. If you are a medical professional there is a requirement… maybe too hard of a term, a motivated financial interest in keeping your practice, diagnosis, and treatment within the boundaries of commonly accepted or board certified care.
    Not because they are demanding that you walk in lockstep with the boards recommendations, but because if you choose to do something way outside of the commonly accepted practice, you will lose a malpractice lawsuit.
    This COVID mis/disinformation law is not that. It is nothing more than “do what the government tells you to do.”

Comments are closed.