If nothing, the fellows at the Cult Coalition to Stop Gun Rights Violence are predictable:
And… comments!
Ceti Alpah 5 called, go home.
You don’t check your mirror often, do you?
Good TV show!
Melodramatic much?
Well how cute! Wishing on a kid’s death! Humanitarian award coming up.
Confirmation that she (and probably none of them) did not even bother to read the article.
Why are Gun Control activists so violent?
Looking good there Clarence!
Re-reading The Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honour?
I am pretty sure she carries at the 3-4 O’Clock position.
Bob, you really don’t wanna go there with this particular Mom. And how is NOT having a gun help avoiding a rape or robbery?
Voice of reason? BAN HER!
And the obligatory redneck joke makes its appearance.
Not all women are stupid mental weaklings like you.
I am still trying to figure out WTF that means.
So basically, if you have a gun, train or teach, you are crazy, unfit to be a mother, you are a sub-human and you should be either dead or at least sterilized. If anything, these people are one of the reasons why we own and carry, why we fight for the Second Amendment.
“Humanitarian award coming up.”
Given she was wishing for the death of a young child, I wouldn’t put it past her to be hoping to see the baby again in the form of lunch.
The Laddites are good for keeping us amused. The comment by Nancy Peluso was well worth the price of admission.
Makes you wonder about that whole “War on Women” thing doesn’t it?
My commentary at Backwoods Engineer has been updated to link to this magnificent gallery of stupidity (theirs, not yours, clever friend Miguel; you are doing yeoman service to the cause). These hoplophobes really should see a psychiatrist or counselor.
Bravo well done
So much fear, hatred, and ignorance on the subject displayed by their comments.
One reality check though…don’t they want to at least entertain the notion that this depicted mother is a decent person who wants to protect herself and her child and is responsible? Their comments all presuppose that she has none of those attributes because…well…GUN!
No, they won’t entertain it. In their minds, in any situation, the GUN is the unsafe part.
Not the criminal. Not the rapist. Not the murderer. The GUN.
In their minds, if she were a decent person, she wouldn’t own guns. If she wants to protect herself and her child, she won’t own or touch, let alone carry, a gun. If she were responsible, she’d get rid of all her guns.
Remember, these are the same people who think that a gun in a home with kids is an accident waiting to happen, and that educating the kids on gun safety is both abhorrent and unnecessary, or that if there MUST be a gun in the home, that it be rendered inoperable while there are kids around (i.e. all the time). IOW, that “kid-safe guns” are a better solution than “gun-safe kids”. (Replace “gun” with “pool” and see how easy that is.)
Also remember that these are the same people who believe — really and truly believe — that a woman who is raped and murdered and her child kidnapped and sold into lifelong sexual slavery (probably a short life, that) is morally superior to the same woman defending herself and her child with a gun.
[…] Remember, gun control people tell us that it’s very important for gun owners to be well-traine…. […]
Hell, I could have used that class when I was a new dad. I wore my kid a lot, and had to figure out where roscoe went all by myself. (Fanny packs draw zero attention when you’re wearing a kid, btw, and don’t interfere with the Baby Bjorn straps.)