Where a Hispanic Catholic, and a Computer Geek write about Gun Rights, Self Defense and whatever else we can think about.
It seems so.
Either that or I guess you need to blur faces so you are not in violation of YT-TOS.
And of course, it will only be applied to the conservative unerwünscht.
PS: AWA set the blog up with a Youtube-like video thing. So i don’t have to depend on the YouItiots
Semi-retired like Vito Corleone before the heart attack. Consiglieri to J.Kb and AWA. I lived in a Gun Control Paradise: It sucked and got people killed. I do believe that Freedom scares the political elites.
Comments are closed.
This is to protect rioters from being identified by virtue of them being in livestreams or other posted videos.
But you’re right, it will only be used for the purposes of deplatforming conservatives.
That was my immediate thought. I guess filming in public is no go for anyone now too and and that will be applied evenly and fairly /sarc
The Andy Ngo and Project Veritas rule.
Yeah, that’s the way I interpreted it. No faces without model release forms, just like publishing film photographs in the old days.
Since what I post tends to be just something around my shop, and not even my face appears on camera, I didn’t pay it any mind but it really seems like what all three prior comments say.
And, the policy will disappear from the TOS the first time a conservative complains about getting doxxed.
I don’t know. The way I read that rule is that you can’t use facial recognition software to identify people on videos. The wording doesn’t suggest to me a prohibition of recognizable faces.