Take these words and brand them into your mind.
Actually, if you read this blog you know them already. They need to branded into the minds of normies.
Whatever the Left attacks the right for is an admission of guilt about what the Left is actually doing.
You can take that to the bank and cash it.
From The Daily Mail:
A pair of emails from business associates of Hunter Biden reveal he offered to help them unfreeze Libyan assets for a $2million retainer plus ‘success fees’, while they also discussed their misgivings over his drug and alcohol use.
The email exchanges were between mid-level Democratic donors Sam Jauhari and Sheikh Mohammed al-Rahbani, who in 2015 were both working on behalf of the new Libyan government to free up $30billion in state foreign assets. They had been frozen by the Obama administration under the deposed Muammar Gaddafi regime in 2011.
He outlines the number of connections Hunter has, including his role as chairman of the UN World Food Program, and the relationship he has with then-Secretary of State John Kerry and his then-vice president father, which in turn could provide access to Obama’s file on Libya.
‘Since he travels with dad he is connected everywhere in Europe and Asia where M. Q. [Muammar Qaddafi] and LIA [Libya Investment Authority] had money frozen,’ Jauhari writes, adding that Hunter has also said he has high level access in China, and that, ‘he can help there.’
So Hunter Biden was trying to get money to convince his VP dad to release funds from a terrorist state that his dad’s boss, President Obama, had frozen.
This feels a lot like treason.
Don’t forget the the big guy always gets his 10%.
Remember when Leftists were jumping up and down screaming Trump and his kids were committing treason?
Yup, Hunter and Joe were attempting to do just that.
The accusations of treason were pure projection.
Just another admission of guilt.
Some day We the People will live our lives in America and dems will sit inthier ivory towers wondering why they are irrelevant…
There are good men, and there are bad men. Good men have a set of morals and live by those morals. What goals a good man has must fit those morals.
A bad man has goals. They live by those goals. When a moral is in the way of achieving a goal, the moral must be made to fit the goal or the moral must be discarded.
This is how you can have a person that belongs to PETA but has no trouble assaulting and attacking humans. The goal is more important than morals.
This is how you can have a person that supports freedom of speech but wants that person removed from twitter because he says bad things.
The goal is always more important than any moral.
And in order for bad people to achieve their goals, morals must be destroyed. People must be taught that morals are relative.
In my life time I’ve met exactly one consciousness objector that really was. He was willing for his wife to be raped, tortured and murdered rather than lift a hand against another. He was willing to die rather than lift a hand to save himself.
He was quite willing to have other men with weapons defend him. He just wasn’t willing to do it himself.
Your last sentence didn’t need “other”, because the “he” that you met wasn’t/isn’t a man.
Sounds like the difference between children and adults.
Spammer alert.
https://youtu.be/duFierM1yDg
Aaand, it’s gone. Quick action, gracias!