Proving once more that if you are a journalist, you don’t know squat about guns even if your target audience is heavily involved with guns, artillery, explosives, etc.
OK, I am not a Glock Fanboi, but I even know that it does not take the physique of Andre The Giant to conceal a G19 or for that matter a G26.
100% Agree Sir. It is good to know that Glock has entered the .380 Auto market. Now I can offer my CCW students another option in .380.
Agreed. It’s not exactly a pocket pistol but the G19 isn’t impossible to conceal either, I use an IWB holster and let my shirt hang over it.
I’m fluffy enough to conceal a full size 1911. A Glock 17 or 19 should be easy.
To me “truly concealable” applies to where concealed carry is legal, but where careers and relationships are absolutely dependent on concealment being 100% and 99% just doesn’t cut it.
Yep, I carry a 1911 commander damn near every day without issue.
One wonders why anybody thought this gun was a good idea. I mean is the Walther Pk38 and the Ruger LC380 selling that well?
Meanwhile Kahr has been selling 9×19 guns smaller and lighter with more capacity for over a decade now….
Weerd — THAT’S the part I don’t understand. I do not believe the recoil impulse is really that much different between a 9x19mm and .380ACP with a reasonably ergonomic grip. . . so why not go 9mm _first_?
[…] came across an interesting post this week, citing where the Marine Corps Times had said that the Glock 42 was “…the […]