I Am Not A Lawyer…. I am a computer scientist.
Yeah, an actual scientist. I didn’t study “Information Technology” or “Information Systems”, I studied “Computer Science”.
I’ve written in so many different computer languages that I’ve forgotten the names of some of them. My first language was PolySci basic, followed by Apple Basic. I quickly moved into 6502 machine code on an Apple II and a KIM. I learned 8080 and Z80.
I wrote my first interpreter back around 1978. It was written in 6502 machine code with the built-in assembler on the Apple II. It was designed for a custom op/amp system to control a model solar home heating system. The next major code I wrote was for the QC department at Planters Peanuts. This was at a time when the only computers in the plant were mainframes and the personally owned Apple II, the head of QC brought in.
Somewhere in that time frame, I learned COBOL.
Shortly thereafter, I headed off to University.
At University, I learned Pascal, FORTRAN IV, FORTRAN V, a couple of different assembly languages. I had the pleasure of entering a boot program into the boot panel manually. The CDC 6500, and 750 had a panel of toggle switches, you entered the boot program by toggling each bit on that panel. There was just enough space to cause the system to read a block of data from a mag tape and then execute that block of code.
I loved every minute of my time at University. As a broke collage kid I ate well, had all the stereo toys I wanted, had a new car. I even had a girlfriend from time to time.
I’ve never stopped learning. Likewise, I figure that when I stop learning, it will be three days after my funeral.
Computer stuff is how I make my money, it is how I spend my time. I do other stuff for a break and to have actual physical results.
This blog has become very important to me. I’m sure you all are tired of reading my IANAL breakdowns of different cases. 4000 words in part II last night. It was a hard battle to learn how to find the resources to write about these cases. Along the way, I’ve become obsessed with saving you from having to repeat that battle.
To that end, I had to find the right tools. I’ve paid for some of them. Some of them I’ve paid for by providing coding skills.
Let’s take a look at the current pile of crap I’m working with in an attempt to make my life easier.
First, I purchased “languageTool”. This is an open-source grammar checking tool, it is one of the reasons that my writing seems to have improved. It not only catches spelling errors, it also catches wrong words spelled correctly, as well as making me actually put commas in where they belong. It is a powerful tool.
If you don’t write 2000+ word documents, the free version will work for you, very nicely.
The next tool I started working with was PACER. I don’t use it anymore except as a source for CourtListener.
I’ve started providing code to CourtListener. It is written in Python using the Django framework. This has only required me to get better at Python, and Django. It also required that I go out and really learn BootStrap 3 and CSS.
CSS is a description language. You provide it with a magic selector, and it will apply different attributes to the selected item. I’ve had to become much better at writing good selectors and designing webpages to have the right types of selectors.
This is the start of dropdown menus.
Oh, a variable can also hold a “function” so you can use a variable as if it is a function.
Historically, computer software was written to take input and produce output. If you wrote a program to add two numbers, the program would ask “First Number:”, “Second Number:” and then it would print “The sum is:” with the sum printed.
The software determined what was going to happen next.
This is no longer the case, you control what happens next. You are writing an email, you stop in the middle of a word, click on the insert image button, upload an image into your email, go back to writing, click on a different program, watch the cat video, reply to the video, click back to your email, decide to do some formatting, then go back to writing.
You all suck. If you would just do the things in exactly the right order to make the computer happy, life would be so much easier.
So back to the learning curve.
I wanted to have “good citations” to provide you with good links and the ability to look up other cases and references. CourtListener didn’t provide that. I added it.
But I found out that “they” don’t actually use citations the way I want to use them. KOONS v. PLATKIN, 1:22-cv-07464, (D.N.J.) has some 130 different docket entries. Somewhere between 50% and 75% of them are actual documents.
Consider this docket entry:
That is all there is for this docket entry. Translated, it says: the United States Court of Appeals has assigned case number 23-1900 to docket entry 126, the defendants’ Notice to the District Court that they were appealing. The circuit court considers that to be a restricted document.
At docket entry 124 it says:
This, though, has a document attached to it. A 254-page PDF full of dense legal speak. When I left off last night, there was still another 100 pages of the document to read. I’m not going to.
So, I’m feeling pretty good about adding better citations. Then the subject-matter experts let me have it with all 7 barrels from a mini-gun. It seems that I’m not doing citations correctly. This is absolutely true. Why is it true? Because there isn’t a “right way” to do citations, there are thousands. The tool I started using only has 43. Its parent project has thousands.
This led to another language to learn. “CSL” This is Citation Style Language. This is written in XML. I was keen to learn it because I wanted to have it create citations for me. Above is the citation as pulled from Courtlistener. Here is a citation pulled and formatted with a custom CSL program:
—KOONS v. PLATKIN, No. 1:22-cv-07464, Doc. 124 (D.N.J.),
If I want a different version, I can use the shorter version: —KOONS v. PLATKIN
If I want the shortest version, I do that manually: — Id.
The first one is a simple drag and drop. The second one is a drag and drop else where, then copy and paste. Yuck.
I started looking into how to do “fix” it and found a different thing. Zotero.org has an API that will provide me with a citation when I ask for one.
Except that I don’t use “Zotero”, I use “Juris-M”. The version I use has extensions specifically for legal citations.
They even have a plugin for Firefox and Chrome to allow you to click a button and download the citation and link to the document to Juris-M. Juris-M then syncs with Zotero to add your citation into the cloud.
I have things mostly working, except I don’t. I’m not pulling the correct stuff and putting it in the correct places. Close, but not good enough.
Here is the issue in a nutshell. Legal citations require you to use the correct abbreviations. You can’t write “Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit” in a citation, you must write it as “7th Cir.” It isn’t “District Court, D. Connecticut” it is “D. Conn.”. I have to extract that information from CourtListener and put it in exactly the right place. Which might require me to use the CourtListener API rather than scrapping the information from the WebPage.
It might be easier to add metadata to the pages from CourtListener, rather than scrapping for it.
Regardless, I can’t get things to work for me with Zotero because I don’t have the right CSL in Zotero.
Which takes us to what I really want to be able to do.
I aim to be able to add citation markers to my articles. I want them to be quick and easy to add. Instead of putting the citation in place, I put something like [Xcite item=”14815850/IBYFACFI” at=5]. There would be a different version for using a paragraph locator instead of a page locator.
I put that marker every place I’m citing that case. I don’t worry about short, long, or anything else. If the cites follow one another, then the following cites would be written as Id. with locator. If there was an intervening citation, it would use a short form. Then it would switch to using Id. again. It could then create a good bibliography at the end of the document.
With this goal in mind, I tried “ZotPress”. It almost works. Not well enough to actually use. This means that what I want to do is modify ZotPress to interact with my own Zotero data server. It’s open source! Except that it isn’t maintained for others to use. There are no instructions on how to use it. It is written in PHP. But the version of PHP isn’t exactly right. And it has a major dependency on a framework that is no longer being supported.
In the process of looking through this, I found something called a “citation server”. Well, wouldn’t you know, they don’t actually do any of the citation processing within Zotero. Nope, they make a network API call to the cite server.
The cite server is available as open source. I download it and created a Docker image. Another technology with its own language. It works great. Except it doesn’t like my Juris-M CSL because it isn’t the correct version.
And that ends today’s rang.
Still too long at 2000 words. It didn’t take as long to write as I didn’t have to dig through as much legal speak. Hope you are having a wonderful weekend.
3 thoughts on “Geek Speak…”
I knew guys like you, I mean Geeks like you back in the day. —1972-74. It’s been over thirty years since I participated in general purpose languages, for chat software and webpage design. LOL, reading your post put me back in time sitting in a living room of a house, six MIT students and I shared for four years (I did not go to MIT), all with different majors in computer science. My major was environmental science, so it was left to me to create a “normal”, non-geek ambiance in that house.
I’ve always had an appreciation for people who ‘like’ languages and specifically, computer speak. The more languages a person learns the more grounded they are in reality. Awa, I for one, look forward to your post here. Having an addiction for ‘everything I don’t know yet’ you are exactly the type of ‘Geek’ who makes life and all its interesting complexities, understandable.
With all the irons I have in the fire, I often don’t have time to reply. But I will tell you that I use your research in my classes to demonstrate how monstrous the legal meat grinder is, and how avoidance is ‘The Key’ element in self-defense. The average person has no idea what they have embraced, and what they have engaged with, when they strap-on a holstered firearm with the purpose of legally defending themselves from a lethal threat. And they have no idea about the complications within the historical legal battles which enables them today to have the right to bear a firearm.
It is why I always address my class on day one with, “Today you are going to make the most serious decision of your life; to enter into a state of risk, where you will possibly save yourself from a lethal attack and then enter another attack, when you enter the legal battle machine.”
What I tool from that wall of text, lawyers suck and ole Billy was right…
…and that’s why I became a physicist. 🙂
Login or register to comment.