1. Exploring the (thought) process behind 2+2=5 may provide some insight in a philosophy class, perhaps as a discussion about how numbers came about, and why defining two as a numerical unit equivalent to two units. (See, I cannot even find a way to define numbers without using the numbers themselves….) might be a fun thought exercise.

   What if 2+2 did not equal 4? What impact would that have on the real world? Would our technologies and machines stop working? If not, what does a “truth” like 2+2=4 really mean? Good discussion for philosophy class.

   What if maps did not have compass directions on them? What if the ordinal compass directions were arbitrary, assigned by the printer randomly? How well will their use in the real world work out?

   However, to claim it is “more powerful” than defining the rules/axioms behind mathematics is laughable. I do believe Mr. Chica has to be on drugs.

   4

2. Professor of Economics, AOC finds 2+2=5 perfectly logical. $2 (stolen from taxpayers)+$2 (in fees for questionable government services)=$5 spent on buying votes for progressive socialist candidates.

   4

3. Ian’s right about a lot of things, turns out.

Comments are closed.