1. Remember the mid 70s case where 3 women sued DC police because they failed to protect the women and knocked on the door and drove thru the apartment parking lot? Judge said- no duty to protect individuals…. So popo are like weather men, they can lie, do a shiite job and still get paid..

   4

2. Since they shouldn’t be in law enforcement, in any capacity, anywhere, ever again in their lives, none of the Disgraced from Uvalde should have a service weapon. Otherwise, I can’t disagree with the sentiment.

   1

3. This is why we should have asylums.

4. https://twitter.com/SteelPhoenix78/status/1661735900865495040
   “Police at Uvalde had AR15s of their own, and wore plate carriers that, unlike the shooter’s, had actual armor plates in them, and they vastly outnumbered the shooter. They were cowards.”

   2

5. While I do agree with all the comments already posted, I have from the beginning, thought, ‘what was the directive given by superiors to the officers on site. Were they told to stand fast or stand down, to wait, to not engage’. If so, I am amazed not one fully protected and armed officer did not disregard orders and bring the fight to the killer. It could be that cowardness and corruption both had a lot to do with this tragedy.

   2

   1. I agree. If the narrative is still true it took one brave border patrol agent to say wtf are we doing to run in.
      .
      We’ve been told over and over I was just following orders isn’t acceptable.
      .
      I want to know what those orders were that were just being followed.
      .
      Everything I remember from the beginning too was the uvalde chief doing everything in his power to get someone else to take over and be responsible.

Comments are closed.