1. What, you didn’t see that little bit about age appropriate instruction?

   Doesn’t that make it all okay?

   2

2. Hans, get the flammenwerfer.

   5

3. So much for this:

   https://youtu.be/gFjBYjFHUIk

4. “I say we take off and nuke the site from orbit. It’s the only way to be sure.”

   The second thing that jumped out at me was $140 for one hour/week, $240 for two hours/week. That’s a lot of money to have someone groom your child for sex slavery.

   8

5. You’re missing the big picture. After they’ve spent 12 years in school learning critical race theory, the only job they’ll be qualified to do will be stripping. So why not give them a head start in training for it?

   5

6. Once again, call Disney.

   I wonder how they feel about their intellectual property being used in this manner.

   For those unaware, this is a stylized (stripperized?) Rapunzel, from the movie Tangled. They even included her chameleon, Pascal, on the pole.

   Great movie, highly recommended … and also highly copyrighted. Some things Disney might let slide, but elements of Tangled — including costumed Rapunzel (complete with the braided and flowered hair) and Pascal — are installed in Disney parks. You’ll find that when their IP appears in the parks (and is visibly tied to their public “family-friendly” image), Disney becomes much more protective of their copyrights.

   You might not be able to stop the classes, but you can cause the … erm … “facility” some problems and make it more expensive to advertise.

   6

   1. What Archer said. The House of Mouse has lots of lawyers who take IP protection very, very seriously. I’m not a fan of the Disney corporation for a number of reasons, but in this case, I’d sic Disney on the group.

      1

      1. Thanks, LittleRed1.

         “When Wokes collide….”

         Pass the popcorn. 😀

         2

7. No. Words. (Other than those.)

   1

8. I read elsewhere that the husband of the organizer is a convicted child molester.

   Well, birds of a feather… 😀

Comments are closed.