1. Antifa wanted to burn down the courthouse, destroying the records and evidence housed inside. That would have disrupted operations of the court.

   Why are they so transparently corrupt?

   9

2. Why?

   Because they can.

   And the idiotic rationalization s are only there as an additional “fyvm”.

   7

3. Ah, uh, umm, uh, hmm… This is the brilliant legal mind Obama wanted to be a Supreme Court Justice.

   11

4. Never mind that antifa/blm’s blockade and siege of the Federal Courthouse in Portland was going on 24/7 and disrupted daytime operations, too. This isn’t even a double-standard, as is typical with the Left. This is 100% falsehood!

   Maybe … just maybe … he’s speaking metaphorically. As in, “Since antifa/blm took root, a darkness has settled over Portlandia; it is always as night there.”

   Nah. That would be far too introspective and honest. And besides, metaphor has no place — and should never have a place — in interpreting literal law. Otherwise the law can mean anything you want if you can make a sufficiently-plausible analogy.

   (Which might actually be the point. Hmmm…. This bears further consideration.)

   3

5. It’s worse than that. They are saying that violence is only violence if there is a specific person that you can point to as a victim. This is how they can say that the siege of the court house in Portland isn’t violence, but saying mean things or ‘misgendering’ some person with tits, long hair, and a 9 inch cock is violence.

   3

   1. Oh yay, that means if someone just disappears, it’s not really violence?

      Boy, they are just hellbent on uncorking that can of worms, aren’t they?

      4

6. Huh welp, whats good for the goose n all that

Comments are closed.