Damned Gun White Supremacists shooting a poor man because he was being obnoxious, right?
SAN ANTONIO, Texas (KTRK) —A man is dead after police say a father shot and killed him for threatening his family inside a Popeye’s Chicken restaurant in San Antonio.
Police say the robber approached the father around 8:30 Wednesday night while he was waiting for his kids to leave the bathroom.
That’s when the robber pointed his gun at the family.
The father pulled out his own gun and killed the robber in the middle of the dining area.
Police say the father is a licensed carrier. He is not facing any charges.
Officials also say the father saved several lives.
Father kills armed robber threatening his family at restaurant.
Liberals love parsing language to create a “favorable” mood to their cause rather than tell the facts. That would explain why the herd of sexual predators got away with so much shit as it was not sexual assaults but friendly taps and hugs.
The again, since the father was a concealed carrier and National Reciprocity is on the news, there is no way in hell Traditional media is going to give example on how well it actually works and rather go with “Blood on the streets” and “Armed Felons across State lines.”
You know, lies.
Would have been interesting had this been in a gun hating state.
Sadly, in a gun hating state, the father may not have been able to carry concealed. The result wold be far less satisfying. After all, who needs a gun for self defense?
True dat. But I meant more like a gun-disliking state, where maybe only the connected people have carry permits and of of them who did it.
In a disarmed victim state (let’s be sure to call things by the correct name) only the connected people have permits. But those are also the very people protected by the left wing media (and typically *include* the left wing media owners). So if this had happened in such a place you would most likely have heard nothing; if anything had been published it would have been worded in favor of the permit holder, because “he’s one of us”.
“No way the media will cover this” except you directly quote and give a link to a major media outlet covering the story…
Great story though, thanks for sharing
If you read harder, you won’t have to write stupid comments.
Well, I suppose the story was “covered” by a major outlet, but the point is that their coverage starts with a headline that is a blatant LIE. Fortunately, it’s rather an obvious and stupid one.
Gun controllers honestly think that it is better for that family to be killed by a robber than for the father to have a gun with which to defend himself.
Neil Smith likes to quote T.D. Melrose’s rendering of what you just observed:
“Victim disarmament types are sick, sick people, who’d rather see a woman raped in an alley and strangled with her own pantyhose than see her with a gun in her hand.”
They have since changed “harassing” to “threatening.” No mention of an update on their site. Journalistic integrity? Naw.
They don’t take comments or list an email for the author or editor. Closest they come is a link to report typos. I used that to tell them, ‘Honest journalists would place a note on the story that they changed the headline from “harassing” to “threatening.”‘
Perhaps some of you would like to point that out to them: http://abc13.com/father-kills-armed-robber-threatening-his-family-/2751065/
“Harassment” means “bothering,” right? Well, if someone stuck a gun in my face, it would bother me. Ergo . . .