J.Kb. posted about the case regarding Mexico suing a number of American firearm manufacturers for reasons. Oral arguments were heard in the 1st Cir. on the 24th. I’ve created one of my automatic transcriptions. I have not finished listening nor reading.
That is part of the plan for today.
The short version seems to be that the District Court tossed the case because it was in direct violation of PLCAA.
The problem, for me, is that much of this is not a 2A case but a bunch of other things.
I need to understand the legal concept of extraterritorial, what the lawyer is talking about when he claims that only some things are precluded by PLCAA. If a US court must hear the case because of a violation of Mexico’s laws. There is a section on “cumulative damage”, “jurisdictional stripping”, references to multiple cases, are all issues mentioned. They are also considering if they should allow the case to proceed, regardless of PLCAA because if Mexico were to do this in Mexican courts, they would have no way of enforcing on the American companies.
There is a bunch of stuff regarding “aiding and abetting liability”. And “proximate cause”, whatever that means.
Meanwhile, I’m attempting to get some client work done. Including GFZ. Have a good one!