1. Actually, there are no constitutional limits on civilian ownership of weapons. If the authors of the constitution didn’t contemplate civilian ownership of fully armed naval vessels, why did they include the bit about “letters of marque?” If you can own a battleship, then, if freedom of the press isn’t limited to soapboxes and letterpresses, you can also own tanks, APCs, a private air force, etc.

   That said, there are plenty of UNconstitutional limits on civilian ownership of weapons today….

   5

   Reply

2. I think I liked Michael Reeves’s modification better.

   (He rebuilt and reprogrammed a Boston Dynamics Spot model to ‘urinate’ beer into a cup.)

   3

   Reply

   1. Well, to *try* to hit the cup, anyway.

      1

      Reply

3. I’m reminded of videos, in the past couple of years, of drones with remotely-actuated handguns mounted on them. Same sort of idea, but easier to make, no restricted or overpriced hardware needed.

   Reply

   1. Ala FPS RUSSIA. Just remember the mantra kids!-
      Man built it , man can defeat it…

      1

      Reply

   2. The US has rather severe restriction on the use of drones .

      1

      Reply

4. I also have a source for cubic tungsten buckshot. Still thinking about what to use for the wad.

   1

   Reply

   1. Why would a regular wad not serve?

      1

      Reply

   2. Also cube shaped projectiles spread very rapidly.

      You’ll probably have pattern density issues.

      1

      Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.