CSAM (Say What Now?)
So, this Ohio dad found out his eleven year old daughter was being groomed by a dude on the internet, and manipulated into creating and sending sexual images of herself to the perp. He did what any of us would do (provided we didn’t have an address for the perp… lots of options when you know that… but I digress): he called the police.
Watch the video. I cannot EVEN. The cops say, and I quote, “I mean, she could probably get charged with child p*rn.”
I’m sorry, the ELEVEN YEAR OLD?
First, under the age of consent in a state (generally around 16, tho a bit higher and lower in various places), a child cannot consent. Therefore, they can’t be involved in sexual things by choice. Second, the unknown male perp should be getting charged with something, that’s for sure, and those cops should have been asking questions about him! Third, I don’t know that I’d have had the calm that father did, in just shutting the door and walking away. Good f’ing grief.
For those who may not know, CSAM means Child S*xual Abuse Material, and it’s a term used to differentiate between porn (which is legal and done between consenting adults) and child abuse (which cannot be consented to).
This is a bad design
I know nothing about this beyond the picture I found on the internet.
Just looking at it made my face cringe, my eye twitch, and by butthole clench.
I don’t know where this is, who this is, what holster this is, all I know is that it is a bad design.
I’m curious how many people signed off on this to have it made and nobody lookd at it and asked, “why?”
The other thing I know is that when this guy chambers a round and shoots his foot off, Glock fanbois will blame Sig.
Ask Marie Antoinette how that went
This is truly incredible.
Billionaire property developer Tim Gurner said that "We need to see unemployment rise. We need it to rise 40-50%. We need to see pain in the economy. We need to remind people that they work for the employer, not the other way around." pic.twitter.com/E86B8qnn31
— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) September 16, 2023
This piece of shit is Australian, but I suspect that his opinion I’d nearly universal among his socioeconomic class.
I hope, for his sake, that the baby blood drinking Satanic rituals they engage in make then bulletproof.
Put half of middle America, the people who own 400 million guns, out of work.
Squeeze them financially until they hurt to remind them that they are not people but slaves to the billionaire class who should feel eternally grateful for a pittance.
Shit is on such a hairy, ragged edge, that I don’t see that not going tits up violent.
Consider the men who worked their entire lives to buy a house and have a bit of the American dream. Lay them off and take that away from them to teach them a lesson about how their place in life is under the investment class boot heel.
Take away their sense of dignity, their pride, their hope.
See what happens.
Ask the House of Bourbon or the Romanovs how that went.
Senate Democrats cover for mental incompetence
Senate Majority Leader Schumer directs the Sergeant at Arms to no longer enforce the Senate's dress code — to accommodate the senator who wants to wear this outfit to perform his duties. From @axios: https://t.co/M6NwVLTi3z pic.twitter.com/AFkE0gAouT
— Byron York (@ByronYork) September 18, 2023
I understand not liking to wear a suit, but rules of decorum exist for a reason.
If Senator Lurch refuses to put on a suit to conduct official business as part of his duties as a Senator, that’s a problem.
It would be one thing if he were in a cast, and they passed a medical exemption that said he didn’t have to wear suit pants if he can’t put them on over a medical device.
But he just won’t wear a suit.
I’m convinced he can’t wear a suit.
He’s not competent enough to button pants, buckle a belt, and tie a tie.
Rather than admit that, the Senate Democrats changed the dress code.
This isn’t about the dress code, this is about the extent Democrats will go to cover for one of their own being mentally incompetent.