The NYPD noodle video is not the worst part of this story

I rarely cover anything by the New York Daily News because they are a crap newspaper written by horrible people.

I saw a story they posted reposted by the NYC PBA.

SEE IT: NYPD cop pelted with food while trying to arrest man at Bronx barbecue party

Yes, that happened and it’s bad, but it was at the end of the video.

The New York Post (my preferred NYC paper) also covered the story and their video can be embedded in this post.

Watch the cop in the body armor and white T-shirt at the 23-second mark.

One of the guys in that brawl goes for the officer’s gun and the officer twists away and disengages.

The Chinese food was nothing on a brawl in which someone tried to get a gun away from a cop during a takedown and arrest.

This is how bold the criminal element in NYC has gotten.  This is way worse than getting covered in noodles.

Had the cop not reacted, this could have turned deadly for a number of people.

This is getting out of hand.

Spread the love

Latinos going against the narrative

ABC News is one of many outlets pushing this story for the narrative.

Latino activists march in El Paso to demand action from Texas lawmakers in wake of deadly shooting

Latino activists held a rally to demand action from Texas lawmakers one week after a shooting at an El Paso Walmart killed 22 people and injured dozens more.

Members of the League of United Latin American Citizens, which considers itself the nation’s oldest and largest Latino civil rights organization, marched Saturday in Dallas to call for Texas Gov. Greg Abbott to hold a special session on strengthening gun regulations.

See, in the wake of an anti-Hispanic shooting, Hispanics are demanding gun control.

We must take away the guns, for the minorities.

I guess LULAC didn’t get the flyers out to all the Latinos in Texas fast enough.

From The New York Post:

Hispanic El Paso residents flock to gun shops, ranges after mass shooting

Oops…

Dozens of El Paso residents — most of them Hispanic — have flocked to buy weapons and attend firearms classes at one of the Texas city’s largest gun shops in the wake of the mass shooting that killed 22 people at a local Walmart.

Michael McIntrye, general manager at the Gun Central store, told Reuters on Friday that his store tallied double its usual number of sales in the week following the Aug. 3 rampage.

McIntrye?  That sounds Scottish.  Why is he selling guns to Hispanics?  The media as absolutely assured me that white gun owners are all anti-immigrant racists.

Handguns, which can be strapped to the ankle or shoulder under clothing, accounted for most of the sales, the manager said.

Good thing Texas is pretty friendly to concealed carry.  I guess Texas is going to see a spike in CCW applications over the next few weeks to months.

“We actually had two people buy guns here who were actually in the Walmart on the day of the shooting,” McIntrye said. “The other people are just saying, ‘Hey, you know, I want to be able to protect myself in the event of something going on.’ This is not the last mass shooting we’re going to see.”

They are right.  Hope for the best, prepare for the worst, carry always (wherever it is legal).

The shop also hosts classes for people interested in obtaining their concealed carry licenses — and the number of attendees has multiplied following the shooting, according to McIntrye.

Like I said.

“I have over 50 for this Saturday class and approximately the same amount for the Sunday class, and I normally have approximately seven,” McIntyre said.

What is the deal with this White Supremacists, teaching Brown people how to use guns to defend themselves?  I am very confused.

This seems to be the beginning of a Hispanic version of Operation Blazing Sword.

Good.

Spread the love

MSNBC Contributor is another example of why we can’t give up our guns

Another day, another unhinged Leftist goes on TV and makes it abundantly clear why we Conservative gun owners cannot give up our guns.

Did you get that?

If you donated to Trump, he wants a mob with torches to come to your house with pitchforks and torches, and terrorize you and your neighbors.

I’m sorry “peaceful demonstrations” with torches.

To answer Chris Hayes’ question, the redress to deal with a President like Trump is an election as per Article II of the Consitution of the United States.

This is the same Blackkklansman who was on another MSNBC show, AM Joy, discussing shaming and harassing Trump donors and said this:

“Don’t communicate to them. You beat them. They’re not a majority of this country. The majority of white people in this country is not a majority of this country. All the people who are not fooled by this come together and go to the polls and do whatever you have to do. You do not negotiate with these people. You destroy them.

This is a progressive given multiple opportunities on a major cable news network and has put his toe on the line for inciting mob violence against Trump donors, Trump supporters, and white people in general.

This is outlandishly racist and dangerous, but MSNBC lets it air like it’s a legitimate opinion.

It is like they are going out of their way to show why gun confiscation is a bad idea.

Go ahead and give up your guns.  Then donate to Trump or whatever Republican the Left brands as the “nex Hitler” (keeping in mind that they called G.W. Bush and Romney “Hitler” as well).  Then wait for your donation information to be made public and an angry mob to show up with torches on your lawn to protest and do whatever you have to do, to keep you from doing that again.

See if the end result of that was a good idea.

I’m not going to give up my guns.  I’m especially not going to give up my guns at the behest of people who say they want a mob to come to my house and destroy me.

Spread the love

Senate Democrats threaten the Supreme Court over the Second Amendment and inch us closer to CW2.0

From Fox News:

Senate Dems deliver stunning warning to Supreme Court: ‘Heal’ or face restructuring

Several high-profile Senate Democrats warned the Supreme Court in pointed terms this week that it could face a fundamental restructuring if justices do not take steps to “heal” the court in the near future.

The ominous and unusual warning was delivered as part of a brief filed Monday in a case related to a New York City gun law. Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, Richard Durbin, D-Ill., and Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., referenced rulings by the court’s conservative majority in claiming it is suffering from some sort of affliction which must be remedied.

The case is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. City of New York, New York.

The Democrats are desperate to keep the Supreme Court from expanding gun rights in any way, shape, or form.

“The Supreme Court is not well. And the people know it,” the brief said. “Perhaps the Court can heal itself before the public demands it be ‘restructured in order to reduce the influence of politics.'” 

This is the most self-oblivious statement I have ever read.  Senate Democrats say that the court is too political, so if the court refuses to bow to Democrat political pressure, the Democrats will punish the court.

To any reasonable person, that is twisting the court’s arm to be more… what’s the word… political.

This has always been a tactic for the Democrats.  When the Left marches in lockstep, they are never accused of putting party over country.  When the Right holds fast to principle instead of doing what the Left wants, they are told they are putting party over country.  So it is with the Supreme Court.  When SCOTUS legislates from the bench for the Left, that is good law.  When SCOTUS affirms a right the Right likes (e.g. Heller and McDonald), that is the court engaging in bad partisan politics.

The Democratic senators’ brief was filed in the case of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. City of New York, which dealt with legal limitations on where gun owners could transport their licensed, locked, and unloaded firearms. They are urging the court to stay out of the case brought by the NRA-backed group, claiming that because the city recently changed the law to ease restrictions, the push to the Supreme Court is part of an “industrial-strength influence campaign” to get the conservative majority to rule in favor of gun owners.

So regardless of how unconstitutional NYC’s law may be, if the Supreme Court decides in favor of the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, which is supported by the NRA, Senate Democrats are going to enact revenge against the Court.

This is a more aggressive step taken by the Left than ever before.  If they can bully the Supreme Court on this case, they can do it on any other case.  The Democrats only need file a brief that says “this is how we want you to decide and if you don’t we’ll pack the court or move you to lower courts and replace you with Justices we like.”

If this is allowed to happen, the Supreme Court will no longer be a check and balance on the Legislature.  It will be a panel of Judges to rubber-stamp the Constitutionality of anything the Democrats want.

If the Left manages to pull this off, the ballot box may no longer be the right box to protect us anymore.

Spread the love

How many in Hong Kong wish they had an AR-15 right about now

I have to agree with the comment in this Tweet:

This looks bad:

It appears as though the Chinese military is about to siege Hong Kong with ground forces.

If the Chinese military mounts a full operation to pacify Hong Kong, I cannot imagine what the death toll will be.

You want to know why our Founding Fathers enshrined in the Constitution the Right to Keep and Bear Arms?

This is why.

 

Spread the love