Each of us here at the GFZ has a niche that we get into.
Miguel is our security camera guy. AWA is our digital security guy. I am our physical security guy.
I have been following the Liberty Safe kerfuffle and wanted to give my opinion.
To do this accurately, I’m going to break this down into two separate issues: security and policy.
First, security.
I have a couple of Fort Knox safes. When I bought them, I registered them with Fort Knox. In my paperwork packet is information about how Fort Knox keeps the combination for my S&G mechanical dial lock. If I ever forget my combination, I can provide my serial number, proof of purchase, and other information on a notarized form, or on law enforcement letterhead and they will provide the combination to a licensed locksmith to come and open my safe.
In the event that I die, my inheritors can provide paperwork, including proof that they inherited my safe, and Fort Knox will dispatch a locksmith to open the safe and give them the combination.
Across the board, it seems that every US gun safe manufacturer has a similar system and policy.
When my dad died suddenly, we had to go through all sorts of rigamarole to get access to his bank accounts, credit cards, safety deposit boxes, internet passwords, etc.
A safe is no different. I’ve seen some people say online, “Drill the safe.” That’s stupid.
My safes are very expensive. A safe has value in and of itself, beyond its contents. Once a safe is drilled, it’s dead. It’s been irreparably damaged. My lawful inheritors should be able to open my safe without having to destroy it and its value.
As much digging as I have done online, I have not come across a single incident that involved a criminal opening a safe by getting the combination from the manufacturer.
It’s a ridiculous premise if you think about it. A mechanical lock has a combination. Digital locks apparently have a master override code. I would assume that the master code is specific to the lock and not universal to all the locks of a particular make and model. If your garage door opener has a unique code, so can your safe.
A thief would have to know the location of your safe and get its serial number from inside the safe, and then in an act of identity theft that includes a public notary, request your combination.
As for the storage of that information by the manufacturer, that falls under corporate security, with layers and layers of protection to keep customer records safe.
Your $2,500 Liberty safe from Cabela’s, sitting in your basement in your suburban home, is not going to get targeted to that degree. You have to worry about the local hoodlums with crowbars who want your stuff to sell for drugs.
If your safe is opened with the combination, I can guarantee it’s because you wrote it down somewhere and they found it, or your bitch ex-wife told someone the combination (that was the only verifiable anecdote of a guy who had his safe burglarized with the combination).
The people online who are going nuts over the idea that their safe has a backdoor master code are being paranoid.
Let me draw you this parallel.
When I got my Mustang, it came with one key fob. My fob got damaged and didn’t work anymore. I had to have it towed to the Ford dealership. There, I had to provide my license, registration, proof of insurance, and proof of ownership (car loan documents) so the dealer could contact Ford corporate and with the VIN, order a new key fob that would work with my car.
Imagine if I took my car to Ford and they said, “We don’t keep that information. Those key fobs were the only ones in existence for your car. Your car is effectively totaled, you’ll never get it started again.”
That’s fucking stupid.
And try as I might, I have yet to find an incident of a criminal ordering a new fob for a particular VIN to steal a car. All of the fob thefts I have read about are from people who have lost control of their fob and had it cloned.
Security failures like this are almost never the result of a top-level breach (somebody hacking Ford and getting all the fob codes or hacking Liberty and getting all the master codes), but a low-level breach (writing your password down so you don’t forget it or leaving your key for your other car at home while you go on vacation).
At the end of the day, I have to remind people: You’re not that special, Ocean’s 11 is not going to carry out a multi-level caper involving corporate espionage to make off with your guns.
From a physcial security standpoint, this is not a serious concern for me.
If it is a concern for you, my two recommended options are: buy a used safe with cash so the company record doesn’t have your information, buy a new safe and pay a locksmith to replace the lock so the lock is different than the one in the company record. Then make sure you don’t die without some executor knowing the combination or your inheritors will have to drill your safe.
Second, policy.
This is where Liberty fucked up.
Liberty should have had a policy that says if law enforcement wants the code to a safe, then they have to get a judge to sign a warrant that compels Liberty to provide the code.
Providing the code to law enforcement because they have a warrant to search the homeowner’s home is bad policy.
Unfortunately, Liberty will pay for that.
What I hope to see come out of this is a broad reaction from all US gun safe manufacturers to clarify their policy on the conditions in which they would provide combinations to law enforcement, and that should require a warrant for the combination from the manufacturer.
I hope Liberty recovers, they make good products. It’s important for law-abiding citizens to own gun safes and to lock up their guns to prevent unauthorized access, and having a gun safe company go under Bud Lite style won’t help any of us in the long run.
If there is a silver lining, I look forward to possibly picking up a few used Liberties at pennies on the dollar from the same class of people that poured out all of their Bud Light.
Like this:
Like Loading...