Aaron Bushnell became a good communist

On Sunday afternoon, US Air Force Airman, Aaron Bushnell set him self on fire in front of the Israeli Embassy.

 

He’s being celebrated because he supposedly did this to free Palestine.

I’m not sure how this helps.

But other news brought more information to light.

 

 

He was a “comrade” and was dedicated to “liberation.”

He was a communist. That is communist language.

This is how revolutionary communists speak of one another.

So not just did he support Hamas, he supported communism.

And on Sunday afternoon, he became a good communist by his own hand.

I hope it hurt a lot.

Spread the love

This is going to keep me up all night.

I just found this pic in my computer.

That is my old work bench in Miami and that is a double hook trigger group for AK.

I don’t recall it.

I checked by WSAR and it still has the crappy single hook it came with from Century Arms.

Where the @#*& is that trigger group? I don’t even know where to begin looking for it.

PS: The recoil buffer went to pieces lord knows how long ago and it was all over the inside…. and the gun kept shooting.

 

 

 

Spread the love

Facebook “Community” Standards cover all the world apparently.

I saw a sale in LEO trades that even make me think about violating my standard self- promise of not buying anything in .40 Short&Weak, and just posted the link in the Book of Faces for those who may be interested:

AimSurplus, LLC

A couple of minutes later, I got hit by the Zuckbots.

What the fuck do I care about the community standards and laws of countries outside the US? And more importantly, why do you care, dear Facebook? And yes, I know the current administration would giggle itself out of testicles if they could ban the sale of firearms, but that is not the law.

I hit the automatic challenge decision button and somebody must have figured out they screwed up because the post got reinstated.

But now you know. You must be aware of all the laws and customs of all the governments around the world before posting to Facebook or face the consequences.

 

Spread the love

The arguments get weaker and weaker

Giffords has stepped in on a PA case with arguments to have the case heard en banc

Theses are some of the weakest arguments I’ve seen so far, from the infringers.

They are arguing that the panel majority applied a requirement that the regulations presented by the state “need only be ‘relevantly similar'” instead of “analogous.” They claim that it is too strict of an interpretation.

They claim that the panel required a precise historical analogue, which is too rigorous, nearly making it a “historical twin”.

The problem is that they don’t even meet that lower standard of “relevantly similar”.

One part of the argument is that the Supreme Court has stated that time-place limitations are constitutional. Thus, a ban on 18-20 year-olds carrying firearms is acceptable because it is only a limit for the duration of “the emergency”.

They fail to note that “the emergency” has been ongoing for over 3 years now.

So they go to their second argument.

1791 isn’t the right time frame. You need to use 1868!

Giffords claims that the Supreme Court did not set the date. This is not true. The meaning of the constitution, was set when it was adopted. The meaning of each amendment was set at the time it was ratified.

In this case, the Second Amendment was ratified in 1791. That is the correct era.

The argument that it should be 1868, when the Fourteenth amendment was ratified is bogus. The 14th incorporated the meaning of the constitution, as it was understood when adopted and amendments 1-13 were ratified.

This is so weak, it shows that they are losing, becoming more and more desperate.

Spread the love

And in the Caliphate of England…

How long till we will see live televised/streamed stoning and beheadings from Trafalgar Square?

Truly, they are fucked.

Where to Find Halal Fish and Chips in London – Halal Girl About Town

Spread the love